FDX--More rumors of 767
08-05-2011 | 11:52 AM
#42
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 0
A new airframe?!?
Quick, we need to bring back tough guys like BC and DW to make sure the 767 flying doesn't go to foreign pilots. They don't take %$&@ from anyone, not even the membership. I don't know how we would have kept the Asia flying without them.
Quick, we need to bring back tough guys like BC and DW to make sure the 767 flying doesn't go to foreign pilots. They don't take %$&@ from anyone, not even the membership. I don't know how we would have kept the Asia flying without them.
08-05-2011 | 11:56 AM
#43
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,304
Likes: 0
From: MD-11 Captain
What would the 767 pay? Would BC and DW agree that the 767 should be narrow body pay in exchange for getting REALLY BIG A380 rates? Nah, they would never do that ...
08-05-2011 | 04:57 PM
#45
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 0
From: 767 Cap
We do have some MadDogs in conversion. My guess is 767 equals older MD10 conversion replacement.
08-05-2011 | 05:36 PM
#46
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,064
Likes: 37
From: 767 Captain
So, Fedex is operating about 46 A310 aircraft at a loss? I can't claim everything these guys do passes the sniff test (Guangzhou comes to mind) - but I'm a little fuzzy on this statement. Care to elaborate a little?
08-05-2011 | 10:08 PM
#48
Slainge Var'
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,530
Likes: 0
From: Zeppelin Tail Gunner
08-05-2011 | 11:57 PM
#49
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
And why would FedEx operate airplanes at a loss. can you explain this?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
