Posting 13-03 is out.. Let the Excesses begin
04-12-2013, 03:16 PM
#41
Organizational Learning
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Directly behind the combiner
Posts: 4,948
Originally Posted by HIFLYR
Tony
Do not make him think too hard he went to Auburn!
Or for choosing his bride.
It was the choices be made after that.
.
04-12-2013, 03:49 PM
#42
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: Right for a long time
Posts: 298
What will the results look like for a new guy
So being well within the excess zone for MEM WB and within 100 numbers off the bottom of the master seniority list what will the flush look like for a new guy. Will he/she see MEM 757 on the results for practice bid #1, #2 and final no matter what?
Won't the vacancy bid be irrelevant since it is basically being posted so close to the excess (within a week or two)? Thanks.
Won't the vacancy bid be irrelevant since it is basically being posted so close to the excess (within a week or two)? Thanks.
04-12-2013, 03:59 PM
#43
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 117
Originally Posted by atsfdx
In an effort to eliminate FEPP, why doesn't the bid include (-1) on HKG Captain seat?
Last edited by mrzog2138; 04-12-2013 at 04:09 PM.
04-12-2013, 04:08 PM
#44
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: let it snow, let it snow, let it snow
Posts: 829
Originally Posted by mrzog2138
It would not help. The key provision in the contract is that bidding an FDA cannot create an excess. So in your example, if 20 guys bid to relieve excess as a HKG Capt, that would create an additional 20 excesses, and since CBA 24.C.6.c prevents that those 20 pilots would be eligible for FEPP. In essence, a -1 only effects the last guy at HKG.
04-12-2013, 04:12 PM
#45
Line Holder
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Posts: 31
Originally Posted by VSTOLG4
So being well within the excess zone for MEM WB and within 100 numbers off the bottom of the master seniority list what will the flush look like for a new guy. Will he/she see MEM 757 on the results for practice bid #1, #2 and final no matter what?
Won't the vacancy bid be irrelevant since it is basically being posted so close to the excess (within a week or two)? Thanks.
Won't the vacancy bid be irrelevant since it is basically being posted so close to the excess (within a week or two)? Thanks.
04-12-2013, 04:17 PM
#46
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 117
Originally Posted by NoHaz
... and the senior HKG Capts. could bid to relieve excess so bottom guy would probably stay
Last edited by mrzog2138; 04-12-2013 at 04:28 PM.
04-12-2013, 04:24 PM
#47
Organizational Learning
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Directly behind the combiner
Posts: 4,948
Originally Posted by mrzog2138
In the FDAs after you have complete your committed period plus 12 months, you can always bid back without a vacancy bid. Most of those senior guys have already met their obligations and can bid anything they hold at anytime. They just need to give the company a 6 month heads up. So, I doubt that many would bid to relieve excess. If that is the case they would have already given the company their notification of wanting to exit in lieu of a vacancy bid.
The Exit in Lieu of a Vacancy Bid is a lengthy process, and when you begin the process you're restricted from participating in any vacancy/excess postings.
There are people there now waiting for a vacancy posting. You may recall our Executive VP of Flight Operations promised us a substantial posting before the middle of February. That posting has yet to materialize. When it does, you'll see some people move -- some people who had to go in order to keep their FEPP.
.
04-12-2013, 04:27 PM
#48
Organizational Learning
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Directly behind the combiner
Posts: 4,948
Originally Posted by VSTOLG4
So being well within the excess zone for MEM WB and within 100 numbers off the bottom of the master seniority list what will the flush look like for a new guy. Will he/she see MEM 757 on the results for practice bid #1, #2 and final no matter what?
Won't the vacancy bid be irrelevant since it is basically being posted so close to the excess (within a week or two)? Thanks.
I wouldn't expect you to move on the subsequent vacancy posting for the B-767.
.
04-12-2013, 04:35 PM
#49
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: Retired, again...
Posts: 608
Originally Posted by MaydayMark
I'm a slow learner ... maybe one of you smart computer geeks can explain this one? The 'Excess Posting' published today says ...
Programming logic cannot currently manage vacancies and excesses in one bid, so we need to run separate vacancy and excess bids. A second bid, Posting 13-04, will be published the third week in April offering vacancies associated with the introduction of the B767.
I understand that the economy isn't great and we all want (need?) a proactive company that is able to adapt to changing times. I don't believe there is anything sinister in their proposed downsizing. Can anyone explain why our (legitimately) high tech company can't figure out how to manage a single bid that takes aircraft going away and new arriving aircraft all on the same bid!*?
A High School kid could write the program.
It will be interesting to hear what ALPA thinks.
Programming logic cannot currently manage vacancies and excesses in one bid, so we need to run separate vacancy and excess bids. A second bid, Posting 13-04, will be published the third week in April offering vacancies associated with the introduction of the B767.
I understand that the economy isn't great and we all want (need?) a proactive company that is able to adapt to changing times. I don't believe there is anything sinister in their proposed downsizing. Can anyone explain why our (legitimately) high tech company can't figure out how to manage a single bid that takes aircraft going away and new arriving aircraft all on the same bid!*?
A High School kid could write the program. It will be interesting to hear what ALPA thinks.
Even DAL's outdated IT could handle these variables within a single bid:
Advance entitlement (vacancy)
Voluntary Displacement (excess)
Mandatory Displacement( excess
Secondaries
One big slice with the axe, and you knew what was what......
Good luck to all,
BG
04-12-2013, 04:59 PM
#50
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Originally Posted by TonyC
The last excess for ANC was -1 -- quite a few more than that left.
It would also depend on how many more committee volunteers are willing to bid it and use trip removal to avoid going there very often.
.
It would also depend on how many more committee volunteers are willing to bid it and use trip removal to avoid going there very often.
.
Tsk, Tsk. You shouldn't be be so willing to drag anyone you don't like over the coals
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Hangar Talk
0
02-20-2007 02:16 PM
Southerncowboyz
Major
2
10-31-2006 07:53 PM
