Compass updates
#8812
Banned
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 988
Likes: 0
A lot of Alaska's and others' frustrations goes back to when they thought our debate over a average daily trip guarantee or 4 hours for a non-working calendar day was that it was a 4 hour min-day when it was not. For a while they could not grasp the concept that it didn't apply if you had a duty period touch your "30 hour layover" that you would not receive the 4 hours of add pay. Just ask the guys that had to do those nice Fairbanks layovers love it. With the ADTG, it would have paid a minimum of 14:15 with as little as two legs in 3 days. With the one we voted in, it can pay a minimum of 8:00 hours in 3 days.
Don't be surprised to see someone respond to that last paragraph flailing their arms.
404 likes to stir the pot and antagonize from time to time. It creates good discussions but does occasionally generate some negativity towards him specifically. Don't let one short tempered post towards him cloud your view of us as a whole. He likes the attention anyway.

Pay rates for essentially ONE year of longevity. So effectively, they may as well have just kept the bonus because the rest of us get nothing! What do 2nd+ year FO's get besides a 1.25% raise and a less-than-COLA raise later if the company decides to increase first year pay again (who says they will?)? What do captains get? Except for seniority as you put it... But the bonus did that too.
I thought the reason we were all against this bonus from the beginning was that it only benefited new hires... and yet from my perspective it seems we haven't changed anything. The hotels, granted, are a plus. But again, none of this is anywhere near "industry leading" as RL put it. I think it's embarrassing that people are celebrating this when the other two companies that are owned by our parent, that everyone considers "bottom-feeders," have already had this for a long time.
I thought the reason we were all against this bonus from the beginning was that it only benefited new hires... and yet from my perspective it seems we haven't changed anything. The hotels, granted, are a plus. But again, none of this is anywhere near "industry leading" as RL put it. I think it's embarrassing that people are celebrating this when the other two companies that are owned by our parent, that everyone considers "bottom-feeders," have already had this for a long time.
#8813
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 687
Likes: 22
Plus, the hotels only benefit line-holding commuters. People on reserve aren't any better off having to pay for only 15 nights in base instead of 19, and people that live in base... well obviously don't need it.
Nothing in this agreement benefits EVERY PILOT at the company in a meaningful way, which in my opinion is a serious flaw.
Nothing in this agreement benefits EVERY PILOT at the company in a meaningful way, which in my opinion is a serious flaw.
#8814
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 280
Likes: 5
I think it's too late to "look" at anything. We didn't get to vote on this and our leverage for attracting new pilots is completely gone. What will stop the company from paying FO's 50/hr if they are able to afford it? Why would they pay CA's more? We gave away some serious leverage if there's nothing protecting CA pay rates. Very frustrating, but hopefully the final language will have something that we haven't heard about.
#8815
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
Plus, the hotels only benefit line-holding commuters. People on reserve aren't any better off having to pay for only 15 nights in base instead of 19, and people that live in base... well obviously don't need it.
Nothing in this agreement benefits EVERY PILOT at the company in a meaningful way, which in my opinion is a serious flaw.
Nothing in this agreement benefits EVERY PILOT at the company in a meaningful way, which in my opinion is a serious flaw.
Some people are really struggling with the insulting and ridiculous 1st year pay structure.
If you're a 2nd year FO or a Captain, things are a *little* easier with the 45% raise.
But congrats on surviving 1st year pay! The company wants to stay competitive and wants to keep attracting talent. "Others" who say "what about me?" - well, I say you get seniority which = quality of life.
Compass is still lacking the #1 kicker that would attract the masses, and that's a proper flow agreement with Delta and American. Unless that changes in the near future, this pay raise will eventually just become a band-aid that will wear out.
Good news is, the battle of the regionals and their quest to attract pilots has barely begun......and that's going to benefit every one of us when push comes to shove.
#8816
He is that way, but most Compass pilots are pretty good guys and gals. I am just stating what I see. When Alaskabound came to Compass he made the right decision, as did I. However, I don't think Compass is the sweet deal it was for all of us in years past. If I had to pick now, I would be leaning to Endeavor for their higher attrition rate and pay.
A lot of Alaska's and others' frustrations goes back to when they thought our debate over a average daily trip guarantee or 4 hours for a non-working calendar day was that it was a 4 hour min-day when it was not. For a while they could not grasp the concept that it didn't apply if you had a duty period touch your "30 hour layover" that you would not receive the 4 hours of add pay. Just ask the guys that had to do those nice Fairbanks layovers love it. With the ADTG, it would have paid a minimum of 14:15 with as little as two legs in 3 days. With the one we voted in, it can pay a minimum of 8:00 hours in 3 days.
Don't be surprised to see someone respond to that last paragraph flailing their arms.
I don't like to stir the pot, I just am stating it as I see it. If Alaskabound and others think the good decision to come to Compass somehow still applies to pilots today, they are mistaken or are intentionally clouding potentional new hires with incorrect info in order to secure bodies behind them for security at Compass. Those new hires deserve correct information just as when Alaskabound and others made their decision to jump over in 2013-2014.
That is why I think the Endeavor option is a good one to look at. All payscales went up $20K/year.
I thought all the payscales would have gone up with the agreement, especially with the leverage the pilot group had.
A lot of Alaska's and others' frustrations goes back to when they thought our debate over a average daily trip guarantee or 4 hours for a non-working calendar day was that it was a 4 hour min-day when it was not. For a while they could not grasp the concept that it didn't apply if you had a duty period touch your "30 hour layover" that you would not receive the 4 hours of add pay. Just ask the guys that had to do those nice Fairbanks layovers love it. With the ADTG, it would have paid a minimum of 14:15 with as little as two legs in 3 days. With the one we voted in, it can pay a minimum of 8:00 hours in 3 days.
Don't be surprised to see someone respond to that last paragraph flailing their arms.
I don't like to stir the pot, I just am stating it as I see it. If Alaskabound and others think the good decision to come to Compass somehow still applies to pilots today, they are mistaken or are intentionally clouding potentional new hires with incorrect info in order to secure bodies behind them for security at Compass. Those new hires deserve correct information just as when Alaskabound and others made their decision to jump over in 2013-2014.
That is why I think the Endeavor option is a good one to look at. All payscales went up $20K/year.
I thought all the payscales would have gone up with the agreement, especially with the leverage the pilot group had.
#8817
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,564
Likes: 24
Plus, the hotels only benefit line-holding commuters. People on reserve aren't any better off having to pay for only 15 nights in base instead of 19, and people that live in base... well obviously don't need it.
Nothing in this agreement benefits EVERY PILOT at the company in a meaningful way, which in my opinion is a serious flaw.
Nothing in this agreement benefits EVERY PILOT at the company in a meaningful way, which in my opinion is a serious flaw.
#8818
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
The regionals were recently a race to the bottom, now it's a race to see how can be the most attractive to new hires. At least it's a race in the right direction.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



