It's just the flu!
06-18-2020, 10:00 PM
#541
Speed, Power, Accuracy
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: PIC
Posts: 1,706
Originally Posted by contrails12
lol. A pox. Lol
to address your point
antivaxxers and non mask wearers are literally damaging our society by spreading infectious diseases
to address your point
antivaxxers and non mask wearers are literally damaging our society by spreading infectious diseases
And I never said a word about "anti-vaxxers." Not part of this discussion.
06-18-2020, 10:04 PM
#542
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Posts: 1,030
Originally Posted by GeeWizDriver
That is your OPINION. But, because you are a moral narcissist, you insist that you hold the high ground and only your interpretation of the data is the correct one. There is plenty of data that contradicts your position. My point exactly.
And I never said a word about "anti-vaxxers." Not part of this discussion.
And I never said a word about "anti-vaxxers." Not part of this discussion.
06-18-2020, 10:11 PM
#543
Speed, Power, Accuracy
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: PIC
Posts: 1,706
Originally Posted by Knobcrk1
So your position is masks don’t work that’s why you won’t wear it? So if someone had the virus, say next to your loved ones, would you be ok with that guy mouth breathing on them without a mask or would you like them to wear a mask?
But given the fact that most people are using re-usable, cloth masks which are proven to be nothing more than bacteria collectors and an enormous percentage of mask wearers don them as "chin warmers," no, I think it's likely "mask culture" is counterproductive.
It is up to ME to avoid the mouth breather. I take responsibility for my health.
Last edited by GeeWizDriver; 06-18-2020 at 10:25 PM.
06-18-2020, 10:13 PM
#544
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Posts: 1,030
Originally Posted by GeeWizDriver
My position is that the data on the effectiveness of "face coverings" is all over the map. If people were wearing N95 masks or at least single-use surgical masks CORRECTLY, there might me some benefit to their use.
But given the fact that most people are using re-usable, cloth masks which are proven to be nothing more than bacteria collectors and an enormous percentage of mask wearers don them as "chin warmers," no, I think it's likely "mask culture" is counterproductive.
But given the fact that most people are using re-usable, cloth masks which are proven to be nothing more than bacteria collectors and an enormous percentage of mask wearers don them as "chin warmers," no, I think it's likely "mask culture" is counterproductive.
06-18-2020, 10:18 PM
#545
Speed, Power, Accuracy
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: PIC
Posts: 1,706
Originally Posted by Knobcrk1
So your position is masks don’t work that’s why you won’t wear it? So if someone had the virus, say next to your loved ones, would you be ok with that guy mouth breathing on them without a mask or would you like them to wear a mask?
I just believe it is little more than virtue signalling.
06-18-2020, 10:26 PM
#546
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Posts: 1,030
Originally Posted by GeeWizDriver
And where did I say that I don't wear a mask where required by local law, vendor policy, or my company policy? I didn't. When necessary, I do. A SINGLE USE, surgical mask, donned properly by the straps. And disposed of following removal.
I just believe it is little more than virtue signalling.
I just believe it is little more than virtue signalling.
06-18-2020, 10:35 PM
#547
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: B767
Posts: 1,901
Originally Posted by rickair7777
The masked Karens and soy boys would probably be afraid to mix it up with "that guy". They'd have to get within 6' of him, and he's probably bigger than they are anyway.
But sounds like the airlines may set policies banning pax who board with a mask on and then refuse to wear it in flight. That should mostly solve the problem. "That guy" probably would tend to scare off some other pax from flying.
But sounds like the airlines may set policies banning pax who board with a mask on and then refuse to wear it in flight. That should mostly solve the problem. "That guy" probably would tend to scare off some other pax from flying.
06-18-2020, 10:36 PM
#548
Speed, Power, Accuracy
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: PIC
Posts: 1,706
Originally Posted by Knobcrk1
oh ok. Your posts sound like you’re against wearing them. They never mentioned that you do. Any kind of cover helps because the virus is mostly attached to droplets and those can be stopped by a simple mask. The most basic medical student would be able to confirm this.
06-19-2020, 04:44 AM
#549
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 553
Originally Posted by GeeWizDriver
That is your OPINION. But, because you are a moral narcissist, you insist that you hold the high ground and only your interpretation of the data is the correct one. There is plenty of data that contradicts your position. My point exactly.
And I never said a word about "anti-vaxxers." Not part of this discussion.
And I never said a word about "anti-vaxxers." Not part of this discussion.
then you jumped all over me calling me a “moral narcissist”. That must be the in vogue pseudo intellectual terminology of the far right because you’re the third person I’ve noticed on here to use that insult in lieu of fact based rhetoric.
I think what you’re really upset about is the fact that I mention that the emperor’s new clothes are...shall we say...very revealing.
here’s an elitist statement for you:
2+2=4
06-19-2020, 05:16 AM
#550
Speed, Power, Accuracy
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: PIC
Posts: 1,706
Originally Posted by contrails12
look pal, I was trying to make an in jest post about the definition of made up internet troll terminology (Karen, Karen’s, the Karen)
then you jumped all over me calling me a “moral narcissist”. That must be the in vogue pseudo intellectual terminology of the far right because you’re the third person I’ve noticed on here to use that insult in lieu of fact based rhetoric.
I think what you’re really upset about is the fact that I mention that the emperor’s new clothes are...shall we say...very revealing.
here’s an elitist statement for you:
2+2=4
then you jumped all over me calling me a “moral narcissist”. That must be the in vogue pseudo intellectual terminology of the far right because you’re the third person I’ve noticed on here to use that insult in lieu of fact based rhetoric.
I think what you’re really upset about is the fact that I mention that the emperor’s new clothes are...shall we say...very revealing.
here’s an elitist statement for you:
2+2=4
Were you "making fun" of those internet troll labels?
Yeah, didn't think so.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
