Lockdown and Civil Unrest Discussion
#101
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Position: Airplane.
Posts: 67
I can totally understand and empathize with your desire to get to work. It's been a month and it's killing me to not have an airplane to fly right now.
But your willingness to accept personal risk is not a decision you get to make for others. Your desire to disregard the professionals we have that spend a lifetime in public health and our practitioners, virologists, researchers and epidemiologists isn't wise. It's an emotional reaction to a perceived threat to your livelihood.
Rushing back to work now will result in much more damage to our economy and our infrastructure. We have to come through the other side of this with our healthcare system, pathetic as it is compared to the rest of the world, intact. Able to treat sick people. We cannot afford to needlessly kill much larger portions of the population than a return to normal ops would result in.
The experts are as close to correct as we're going to get. Just because they don't always get it perfect means we should abandon their counsel and start listening to politicians who can barely form a coherent sentence.
And what sucks the most? Is that we don't have the leadership in place to handle this. There's no coordinated response. No political detente as both sides set aside their concerns and act together for the good of country.
Just small groups of governors from both parties doing the best that they can. And many of them aren't up to the task.
It will be safe to go back to work when you see the White House open for daily tours again. It will be OK to drag your family to Hawaii and spend money when you see state houses open, with elected officials doing your work.
It will be safe to go back to work when agencies like the CDC says it is, and their scientists' conditions are all met.
Until then, it isn't safe for any of us to be out and about.
But your willingness to accept personal risk is not a decision you get to make for others. Your desire to disregard the professionals we have that spend a lifetime in public health and our practitioners, virologists, researchers and epidemiologists isn't wise. It's an emotional reaction to a perceived threat to your livelihood.
Rushing back to work now will result in much more damage to our economy and our infrastructure. We have to come through the other side of this with our healthcare system, pathetic as it is compared to the rest of the world, intact. Able to treat sick people. We cannot afford to needlessly kill much larger portions of the population than a return to normal ops would result in.
The experts are as close to correct as we're going to get. Just because they don't always get it perfect means we should abandon their counsel and start listening to politicians who can barely form a coherent sentence.
And what sucks the most? Is that we don't have the leadership in place to handle this. There's no coordinated response. No political detente as both sides set aside their concerns and act together for the good of country.
Just small groups of governors from both parties doing the best that they can. And many of them aren't up to the task.
It will be safe to go back to work when you see the White House open for daily tours again. It will be OK to drag your family to Hawaii and spend money when you see state houses open, with elected officials doing your work.
It will be safe to go back to work when agencies like the CDC says it is, and their scientists' conditions are all met.
Until then, it isn't safe for any of us to be out and about.
#102
My point is, it's really easy to be a keyboard warrior, or a talking head on TV, and tell people 'Suck it up buttercup, it's just the flu.' It's entirely different to actually get out there and go about your daily life.
My point is simply that it's really really easy to hide behind a keyboard or step up to a TV microphone and pontificate about how we all need to just suck it up because 'its just the flu'. Breathing is kinda important to life, and people tend to like hanging onto their lives as long as they can.
My point is simply that it's really really easy to hide behind a keyboard or step up to a TV microphone and pontificate about how we all need to just suck it up because 'its just the flu'. Breathing is kinda important to life, and people tend to like hanging onto their lives as long as they can.
#103
Well if that is your point, you certainly haven’t made it. Being real ill isn’t FUN for anyone and most of us don’t want to die. But Calling people ‘keyboard warriors’ and gratuitously demeaning people who honestly hold different views from yours - views they back up with hard facts and good arguments does not make your point. It merely undermines their opinion of you.
#104
And there ARE NO No-risk scenarios in this outbreak. The shutdown is costing lives too:
The apparent higher risk of death and other serious complications from the virus are among the dangers facing cancer patients as they try to navigate a pandemic that has forced the delays of some treatments, the closing of many clinical trials to new patients and shortages of critical pain medications, said Howard Burris, chief medical officer and executive director of the Sarah Cannon Research Institute in Nashville and president of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
“We face daunting challenges to optimal patient care,” he said at an ASCO media briefing last week. He noted that some hospitals “have effectively deemed all cancer surgeries elective,” requiring them to be postponed. While such delays make sense for some patients with early-stage disease, they can be devastating for “patients with fast-moving or hard-to-treat cancers,” he warned.
Oncologists also are concerned about delays in cancer tests and screenings, which are crucial for finding and monitoring the disease and include mammograms and colonoscopies. Tests and screenings plunged in the United States since mid-March, according to a new report by Komodo Health, a health data firm, Reuters reported.
More than 1.8 million new cancer cases are expected to be diagnosed in the United States in 2020, according to the American Cancer Society, and more than 606,000 people are expected to die of the disease.
“We face daunting challenges to optimal patient care,” he said at an ASCO media briefing last week. He noted that some hospitals “have effectively deemed all cancer surgeries elective,” requiring them to be postponed. While such delays make sense for some patients with early-stage disease, they can be devastating for “patients with fast-moving or hard-to-treat cancers,” he warned.
Oncologists also are concerned about delays in cancer tests and screenings, which are crucial for finding and monitoring the disease and include mammograms and colonoscopies. Tests and screenings plunged in the United States since mid-March, according to a new report by Komodo Health, a health data firm, Reuters reported.
More than 1.8 million new cancer cases are expected to be diagnosed in the United States in 2020, according to the American Cancer Society, and more than 606,000 people are expected to die of the disease.
#105
I want to get our economy reopened as soon as possible. I run a small business (45 people) when I'm not flying, and my constant focus has been on keeping my business afloat. This shutdown is really hurting us.
Looking at the latest news out of Sweden, we indeed have reason to believe that we've overreacted here in the US. The data coming from Stanford and USC, if correct, would indicate that this thing is far less lethal (and more contagious) than previously estimated. Which would mean that a rational, thoughtful relaxation of these restrictions is in order, ASAP. It also seems clear that 'one size fits all' restrictions aren't appropriate. What's right for NYC may well be far too restrictive for rural communities with far less population density.
But most of the stuff I've seen from the 'Open it Up!" crowd can be distilled to:
• "MAGA!!!!!"
• "This is a lamestream media / Democrat hoax!"
• "Generic assertion of bravery/ superiority vs. the 'cowards' who advocate continuing restrictions"
Then again, why am I surprised? Replace covid with nearly any issue and that's pretty much how political discussions take place these days in this country.
Last edited by Turbosina; 04-28-2020 at 12:49 PM.
#106
So here's the thing.
I want to get our economy reopened as soon as possible. I run a small business (45 people) when I'm not flying, and my constant focus has been on keeping my business afloat. This shutdown is really hurting us.
Looking at the latest news out of Sweden, we indeed have reason to believe that we've overreacted here in the US. The data coming from Stanford and USC, if correct, would indicate that this thing is far less lethal (and more contagious) than previously estimated. Which would mean that a rational, thoughtful relaxation of these restrictions is in order, ASAP. It also seems clear that 'one size fits all' restrictions aren't appropriate. What's right for NYC may well be far too restrictive for rural communities with far less population density.
But most of the stuff I've seen from the 'Open it Up!" crowd can be distilled to:
• "MAGA!!!!!"
• "This is a lamestream media / Democrat hoax!"
• "Generic assertion of bravery/ superiority vs. the 'cowards' who advocate continuing restrictions"
Then again, why am I surprised? Replace covid with nearly any issue and that's pretty much how political discussions take place these days in this country.
I want to get our economy reopened as soon as possible. I run a small business (45 people) when I'm not flying, and my constant focus has been on keeping my business afloat. This shutdown is really hurting us.
Looking at the latest news out of Sweden, we indeed have reason to believe that we've overreacted here in the US. The data coming from Stanford and USC, if correct, would indicate that this thing is far less lethal (and more contagious) than previously estimated. Which would mean that a rational, thoughtful relaxation of these restrictions is in order, ASAP. It also seems clear that 'one size fits all' restrictions aren't appropriate. What's right for NYC may well be far too restrictive for rural communities with far less population density.
But most of the stuff I've seen from the 'Open it Up!" crowd can be distilled to:
• "MAGA!!!!!"
• "This is a lamestream media / Democrat hoax!"
• "Generic assertion of bravery/ superiority vs. the 'cowards' who advocate continuing restrictions"
Then again, why am I surprised? Replace covid with nearly any issue and that's pretty much how political discussions take place these days in this country.
Sorry, I really am, but it sounds like your problem is you if you’d rather see the country suffer than see your political opponent be correct.
H€||, even a broken clock is right twice a day.
#107
Line Holder
Joined APC: Mar 2020
Posts: 84
The Mayo Clinic is furloughing and/or reducing pay for 30,000 employees.
Such a relief we prevented a hospital overcapacity.
#winning
Such a relief we prevented a hospital overcapacity.
#winning
Last edited by OVC010CB; 04-28-2020 at 03:03 PM.
#108
Banned
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 627
What this crisis has shown is that for-profit healthcare is a failure. We can't have our national healthcare system be dependent on knee replacements and tummy tucks to make ends meet.
#109
Line Holder
Joined APC: Mar 2020
Posts: 84
Auto correct is part of the conspiracy. And I’ll agree for profit healthcare is about as efficient and useful as for profit airline service.
#110
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: 747 FO
Posts: 175
I disagree that there is “literally no risk”. I think it’s a large risk. Both in infecting other people and in exposing yourself (your choice) then asking a Dr or Nurse to risk their life (and their family member's’ lives) to treat you. Not to mention any other essential worker. We will have to open at some point; but the complete lack of a coherent strategy, inadequate testing and unknowns regarding outcomes, mean we should proceed with extreme caution.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post