Lockdown and Civil Unrest Discussion
#42
Banned
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: 756 Left Side
Posts: 1,629
Just a question since you used the words 'ANY of us'..
Am I allowed to go outside, since I had it.. beat it.. and now Negative?
Part of this problem is we've bunched everyone into the same boat when in reality.. not everyone is the same.
Barring a cure/vaccine/herd immunity.. how long do you suggest we stay closed?
And should everywhere be closed?
Should Alaska and Hawaii be under the same restrictions as NYC and LA/SFO?
EVERYONE has to draw their own line in the sand. But from a personal experience viewpoint, we are at a tipping point where the damage to keeping the country closed is greater than the risk of CoVid19.
I drove into Queens yesterday. Saw my 87yr old mom. We both know the risks, we accept them.
But the reason I bring this up was that the park where I grew up (Juniper Valley Park in Queens) is 'technically' closed.
Easily over a hundred people there. Walking, sitting on the grass.. some in lawn chairs, others on blankets. People together and others apart.
Saw a few NYPD cars. Nothing they can do. How do you arrest a family who just wants/needs to get out of there 1000ft sq ft apartment and enjoy a beautiful spring day.. while your'e letting out criminals at the same time?
A Plan must be announced soon for a partial reopening of certain areas (with restrictions) and a timeline for other areas.
AND
It should also be announced that this opening doesn't mean that the virus is gone. That there WILL be continued cases, and continued deaths.
But funny how we can't reopen because it's 'still to dangerous... it isn't safe for any of us to be out and about"
But the USNS Comfort is leaving NYC soon?!
https://news.yahoo.com/usns-comfort-...200241276.html
You would THINK that if it dangerous, she stays.
If there is any danger in re-opening, she stays.
Things don't add up!
Ok, gotta go.. out and about~
LOL
Motch
Am I allowed to go outside, since I had it.. beat it.. and now Negative?
Part of this problem is we've bunched everyone into the same boat when in reality.. not everyone is the same.
Barring a cure/vaccine/herd immunity.. how long do you suggest we stay closed?
And should everywhere be closed?
Should Alaska and Hawaii be under the same restrictions as NYC and LA/SFO?
EVERYONE has to draw their own line in the sand. But from a personal experience viewpoint, we are at a tipping point where the damage to keeping the country closed is greater than the risk of CoVid19.
I drove into Queens yesterday. Saw my 87yr old mom. We both know the risks, we accept them.
But the reason I bring this up was that the park where I grew up (Juniper Valley Park in Queens) is 'technically' closed.
Easily over a hundred people there. Walking, sitting on the grass.. some in lawn chairs, others on blankets. People together and others apart.
Saw a few NYPD cars. Nothing they can do. How do you arrest a family who just wants/needs to get out of there 1000ft sq ft apartment and enjoy a beautiful spring day.. while your'e letting out criminals at the same time?
A Plan must be announced soon for a partial reopening of certain areas (with restrictions) and a timeline for other areas.
AND
It should also be announced that this opening doesn't mean that the virus is gone. That there WILL be continued cases, and continued deaths.
But funny how we can't reopen because it's 'still to dangerous... it isn't safe for any of us to be out and about"
But the USNS Comfort is leaving NYC soon?!
https://news.yahoo.com/usns-comfort-...200241276.html
You would THINK that if it dangerous, she stays.
If there is any danger in re-opening, she stays.
Things don't add up!
Ok, gotta go.. out and about~
LOL
Motch
#43
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2013
Posts: 539
Immaturity? Hide under a rock trembling with fear?
I have no idea who you are. I do not care who you are. As long as you keep posting links that have incomplete or incorrect information, then you need to get called out. In reality you know nothing more than what is being presented to you. There are some really great links out there. I’m actually impressed that you got a link with legit information in it. However 1) It’s preliminary, and 2) doesn’t always say what you are saying it does.
The very fact that after we have gone back and forth for a while, only to have you launch an ad hominem attack demonstrates that you are all talk and no substance. Though I disagreed with you on many points, I lost all respect for you or your argument when you decided to make a personal attack. If you ever wanted to convince me that you were correct (or mature for that matter) you have lost the opportunity.
For the rest of you that may read this, let me be clear: I want the economy opened as soon as practical. I do not want to risk the economic future of our nation on bad arguments and incomplete data. We don’t get do overs, so we better be darn sure we’re collectively making the right decision.
#44
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2013
Posts: 539
So where do I draw the line? Following laws that make sense and have shown to be a benefit to everyone. As to the silly laws, we need to continue to push our elected officials to make the necessary changes. There are gun right organizations that do just that.
But again, we’re not worried about gun rights decimating the airlines or the economy, are we?
#45
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 692
Nice previous post Setobug. Im in the open up camp but I respect your position, its rational and is to the point. However....and there always is a however....if an individual chooses to take a risk why stop them? I see people guzzling booze, riding motorcycles without helmets and chuffing down cigarettes.....do you impose your will on them? No, you roll your eyes as do I.
To the quote, the complacent west needs to come to grips real quick with the impending need to make a decision on data which is 'good enough but not perfect'. Heck the climate change gang has been saying it for years.....'make a decision on what we know before its too late'. Why is this any different?
Simply put. The sledgehammer has come down but now its time to refine the approach.
Oh....and while Im at it, you dont seem too phased about others loosing their career. In the mean time then can you flick me $100k? Ill be loosing mine soon.
Each to their own.....and that includes getting out an about.
To the quote, the complacent west needs to come to grips real quick with the impending need to make a decision on data which is 'good enough but not perfect'. Heck the climate change gang has been saying it for years.....'make a decision on what we know before its too late'. Why is this any different?
Simply put. The sledgehammer has come down but now its time to refine the approach.
Oh....and while Im at it, you dont seem too phased about others loosing their career. In the mean time then can you flick me $100k? Ill be loosing mine soon.
Each to their own.....and that includes getting out an about.
#46
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,544
The beach is not dangerous if you follow social distancing. Opening everything up like Georgia is just dumb.
#47
You could probably add an order of magnitude on to that number and it would still be safe with social distancing. There’s lots of coastline in SoCal. I was at the beach on Saturday (warmest day of the year) and I didn’t get within 20ft of another person. I didn’t see a single person infringe on another parties 6ft bubble.
The beach is not dangerous if you follow social distancing. Opening everything up like Georgia is just dumb.
The beach is not dangerous if you follow social distancing. Opening everything up like Georgia is just dumb.
people are sick of staying home.....I know I am
#48
Line Holder
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 90
Just because the risk of death is down does not in any way imply it is safe to go back out. As we continue to learn more about this virus and some of the side effects for the living, we are finding data that shows this virus is dangerous for other reasons.
You may be willing to risk your own health, so be it. However this is a situation where individuals personal decisions have a great impact on others.
You may be willing to risk your own health, so be it. However this is a situation where individuals personal decisions have a great impact on others.
#49
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,898
This is not a gun debate. We’re not talking about fire arms. FWIW I too have several guns. Since you have decided to bring up guns (although the economy is suffering from the fallout of a virus, not gun rights), let’s talk about that for a second. We have gun laws. Many gun owners agree with many of the gun laws. Some of them make sense and are for the common good (such as felons inability to legally purchase said weapons). I will concede that it is not a perfect system (there are some rather silly gun laws out there).
So where do I draw the line? Following laws that make sense and have shown to be a benefit to everyone. As to the silly laws, we need to continue to push our elected officials to make the necessary changes. There are gun right organizations that do just that.
But again, we’re not worried about gun rights decimating the airlines or the economy, are we?
So where do I draw the line? Following laws that make sense and have shown to be a benefit to everyone. As to the silly laws, we need to continue to push our elected officials to make the necessary changes. There are gun right organizations that do just that.
But again, we’re not worried about gun rights decimating the airlines or the economy, are we?
#50
Bracing for Fallacies
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: In favor of good things, not in favor of bad things
Posts: 3,543
Well shoot, I guess New York can call all scientists around the world and announce problem solved!
Im sure you are well aware that findings require others scientists to review the data and conduct their own investigations. Once that is complete we may only then have a consensus. As of now there is zero consensus! Why? Because the data is largely incomplete. It will take quite a while to review all available data and preliminary findings before the overwhelming majority reach consensus.
This consensus is what prevents fringe entities from taking us down the wrong path. To allow such a thing is ignorant.
Let me restate this:
Ignorance is not an excuse to endanger the public
Im sure you are well aware that findings require others scientists to review the data and conduct their own investigations. Once that is complete we may only then have a consensus. As of now there is zero consensus! Why? Because the data is largely incomplete. It will take quite a while to review all available data and preliminary findings before the overwhelming majority reach consensus.
This consensus is what prevents fringe entities from taking us down the wrong path. To allow such a thing is ignorant.
Let me restate this:
Ignorance is not an excuse to endanger the public
https://www.businessinsider.com/usns-comfort-leaving-nyc-few-coronavirus-patients-three-weeks-2020-4
edit....didn't realize that was covered til I re read the thread.
Last edited by block30; 04-26-2020 at 06:41 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post