Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk > COVID19
Lockdown and Civil Unrest Discussion >

Lockdown and Civil Unrest Discussion

Search
Notices
COVID19 Pandemic Information and Reports

Lockdown and Civil Unrest Discussion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-26-2020, 05:03 PM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
massgflight's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Posts: 149
Default

Originally Posted by Regularguy View Post
He doesn’t necessarily mean anything of the sort, let him define it for the readers of this thread.

BTW I agree with you totally about perception and the need for leaders to comfort people into an acceptable level of safe risk.

Agreed. Perceived safety and mitigation is key.
massgflight is offline  
Old 04-26-2020, 05:17 PM
  #42  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: 756 Left Side
Posts: 1,629
Default

Originally Posted by Setopbug View Post

Until then, it isn't safe for any of us to be out and about.
Just a question since you used the words 'ANY of us'..
Am I allowed to go outside, since I had it.. beat it.. and now Negative?

Part of this problem is we've bunched everyone into the same boat when in reality.. not everyone is the same.
Barring a cure/vaccine/herd immunity.. how long do you suggest we stay closed?
And should everywhere be closed?
Should Alaska and Hawaii be under the same restrictions as NYC and LA/SFO?

EVERYONE has to draw their own line in the sand. But from a personal experience viewpoint, we are at a tipping point where the damage to keeping the country closed is greater than the risk of CoVid19.

I drove into Queens yesterday. Saw my 87yr old mom. We both know the risks, we accept them.
But the reason I bring this up was that the park where I grew up (Juniper Valley Park in Queens) is 'technically' closed.
Easily over a hundred people there. Walking, sitting on the grass.. some in lawn chairs, others on blankets. People together and others apart.
Saw a few NYPD cars. Nothing they can do. How do you arrest a family who just wants/needs to get out of there 1000ft sq ft apartment and enjoy a beautiful spring day.. while your'e letting out criminals at the same time?

A Plan must be announced soon for a partial reopening of certain areas (with restrictions) and a timeline for other areas.
AND
It should also be announced that this opening doesn't mean that the virus is gone. That there WILL be continued cases, and continued deaths.

But funny how we can't reopen because it's 'still to dangerous... it isn't safe for any of us to be out and about"
But the USNS Comfort is leaving NYC soon?!

https://news.yahoo.com/usns-comfort-...200241276.html

You would THINK that if it dangerous, she stays.
If there is any danger in re-opening, she stays.

Things don't add up!
Ok, gotta go.. out and about~
LOL

Motch
horrido27 is offline  
Old 04-26-2020, 05:18 PM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2013
Posts: 539
Default

Originally Posted by OVC010CB View Post
I have had enough of your immaturity and bull sh@ t.

The studies on children in China with COVID-19 replicate the data from NYC. They are published in The Lancet.

Go hide under a rock trembling with fear with tin foil over your head. Leave the rest of us alone.
Are you familiar with an Ad hominem attack?

Immaturity? Hide under a rock trembling with fear?

I have no idea who you are. I do not care who you are. As long as you keep posting links that have incomplete or incorrect information, then you need to get called out. In reality you know nothing more than what is being presented to you. There are some really great links out there. I’m actually impressed that you got a link with legit information in it. However 1) It’s preliminary, and 2) doesn’t always say what you are saying it does.

The very fact that after we have gone back and forth for a while, only to have you launch an ad hominem attack demonstrates that you are all talk and no substance. Though I disagreed with you on many points, I lost all respect for you or your argument when you decided to make a personal attack. If you ever wanted to convince me that you were correct (or mature for that matter) you have lost the opportunity.

For the rest of you that may read this, let me be clear: I want the economy opened as soon as practical. I do not want to risk the economic future of our nation on bad arguments and incomplete data. We don’t get do overs, so we better be darn sure we’re collectively making the right decision.
NeverHome is offline  
Old 04-26-2020, 05:25 PM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2013
Posts: 539
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy View Post
Ah. Give up rights for a collective good. Well, 37% of us are armed. The other 63% are not. To prevent gun deaths, how about we sacrifice for the collective good? And everyone give up their guns. Where do you draw the line?
This is not a gun debate. We’re not talking about fire arms. FWIW I too have several guns. Since you have decided to bring up guns (although the economy is suffering from the fallout of a virus, not gun rights), let’s talk about that for a second. We have gun laws. Many gun owners agree with many of the gun laws. Some of them make sense and are for the common good (such as felons inability to legally purchase said weapons). I will concede that it is not a perfect system (there are some rather silly gun laws out there).

So where do I draw the line? Following laws that make sense and have shown to be a benefit to everyone. As to the silly laws, we need to continue to push our elected officials to make the necessary changes. There are gun right organizations that do just that.

But again, we’re not worried about gun rights decimating the airlines or the economy, are we?
NeverHome is offline  
Old 04-26-2020, 05:29 PM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 692
Default

Originally Posted by Tom Bradys Cat View Post
Nice previous post Setobug. Im in the open up camp but I respect your position, its rational and is to the point. However....and there always is a however....if an individual chooses to take a risk why stop them? I see people guzzling booze, riding motorcycles without helmets and chuffing down cigarettes.....do you impose your will on them? No, you roll your eyes as do I.

To the quote, the complacent west needs to come to grips real quick with the impending need to make a decision on data which is 'good enough but not perfect'. Heck the climate change gang has been saying it for years.....'make a decision on what we know before its too late'. Why is this any different?

Simply put. The sledgehammer has come down but now its time to refine the approach.

Oh....and while Im at it, you dont seem too phased about others loosing their career. In the mean time then can you flick me $100k? Ill be loosing mine soon.

Each to their own.....and that includes getting out an about.
Guzzling booze, riding motorcycles without helmets and chuffing down cigarettes are not contagious. If an individual wishes to take those risks and live with the consequences, the end result is mostly confined to them. However we as a society have taken steps to prevent an individual from guzzling booze and hopping behind the wheel, to prevent death. We’ve passed laws requiring helmets while riding motorcycles, to prevent death. We’ve banned smoking in bars, restaurants, airplanes, etc. to prevent secondhand smoke which could lead to death. This has nothing to do with an individuals willingness to accept the risk of contracting the virus. It’s about protecting those around you who do not or cannot accept the risk. This is a virus, not a personal choice.
KnockKnock is offline  
Old 04-26-2020, 05:30 PM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,544
Default

Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets View Post
I read a news story yesterday that 40,000 people went to the beach in LA a couple days ago
You could probably add an order of magnitude on to that number and it would still be safe with social distancing. There’s lots of coastline in SoCal. I was at the beach on Saturday (warmest day of the year) and I didn’t get within 20ft of another person. I didn’t see a single person infringe on another parties 6ft bubble.

The beach is not dangerous if you follow social distancing. Opening everything up like Georgia is just dumb.
iahflyr is offline  
Old 04-26-2020, 05:40 PM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MasterOfPuppets's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: 787
Posts: 3,138
Default

Originally Posted by iahflyr View Post
You could probably add an order of magnitude on to that number and it would still be safe with social distancing. There’s lots of coastline in SoCal. I was at the beach on Saturday (warmest day of the year) and I didn’t get within 20ft of another person. I didn’t see a single person infringe on another parties 6ft bubble.

The beach is not dangerous if you follow social distancing. Opening everything up like Georgia is just dumb.
Sure but the point I’m making is that 40,000 people went to the beach on one day.....that seems like a huge number based on the supposed fear everyone has.

people are sick of staying home.....I know I am
MasterOfPuppets is offline  
Old 04-26-2020, 05:54 PM
  #48  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 90
Default

Originally Posted by NeverHome View Post
Just because the risk of death is down does not in any way imply it is safe to go back out. As we continue to learn more about this virus and some of the side effects for the living, we are finding data that shows this virus is dangerous for other reasons.

You may be willing to risk your own health, so be it. However this is a situation where individuals personal decisions have a great impact on others.
Its amazing how people are so willing to sacrifice their own freedoms and insist on taking away the freedom of others so they can feel safe. I’m afraid this kind of logic of so prevalent now in our society there may be no turning back.
bluesky24 is offline  
Old 04-26-2020, 06:19 PM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,898
Default

Originally Posted by NeverHome View Post
This is not a gun debate. We’re not talking about fire arms. FWIW I too have several guns. Since you have decided to bring up guns (although the economy is suffering from the fallout of a virus, not gun rights), let’s talk about that for a second. We have gun laws. Many gun owners agree with many of the gun laws. Some of them make sense and are for the common good (such as felons inability to legally purchase said weapons). I will concede that it is not a perfect system (there are some rather silly gun laws out there).

So where do I draw the line? Following laws that make sense and have shown to be a benefit to everyone. As to the silly laws, we need to continue to push our elected officials to make the necessary changes. There are gun right organizations that do just that.

But again, we’re not worried about gun rights decimating the airlines or the economy, are we?
You're missing the point. I quoted a guy who was basically saying it's okay to give up some freedoms as long as it is the for the greater good of society. My point was where do you draw the line.
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 04-26-2020, 06:25 PM
  #50  
Bracing for Fallacies
 
block30's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: In favor of good things, not in favor of bad things
Posts: 3,543
Default

Originally Posted by NeverHome View Post
Well shoot, I guess New York can call all scientists around the world and announce problem solved!

Im sure you are well aware that findings require others scientists to review the data and conduct their own investigations. Once that is complete we may only then have a consensus. As of now there is zero consensus! Why? Because the data is largely incomplete. It will take quite a while to review all available data and preliminary findings before the overwhelming majority reach consensus.

This consensus is what prevents fringe entities from taking us down the wrong path. To allow such a thing is ignorant.

Let me restate this:
Ignorance is not an excuse to endanger the public
Well NYC is sending the hospital ship away due to lack of need/use. Not trying to be a dick, but that ship has nowhere else to be. That thing could park there for years if the powers that be wanted it to. and it's leaving in a few days. The gigs up man.

https://www.businessinsider.com/usns-comfort-leaving-nyc-few-coronavirus-patients-three-weeks-2020-4

edit....didn't realize that was covered til I re read the thread.

Last edited by block30; 04-26-2020 at 06:41 PM.
block30 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
flyforfun
Flight Schools and Training
13
08-13-2008 12:22 PM
tdm1011
Flight Schools and Training
18
04-16-2008 11:06 AM
Squawk_5543
Your Photos and Videos
12
06-21-2007 08:59 PM
MikeInTx
Flight Schools and Training
7
05-13-2007 02:52 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices