Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk > COVID19
Amtrak Service Cuts Possible, 6%, no jab >

Amtrak Service Cuts Possible, 6%, no jab

Search
Notices
COVID19 Pandemic Information and Reports

Amtrak Service Cuts Possible, 6%, no jab

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-05-2021, 05:33 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,063
Default

Originally Posted by DropTank View Post
You're right... don't get vaccinated:
The elderly wear MAGA hats?
Flyfalcons is offline  
Old 12-06-2021, 05:10 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SonicFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 3,595
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by Drum View Post
The mandate is being fought by the representative labor unions of the Amtrak employee groups.

For the WaPo:

"The Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen (BLET) and the Transportation Division of the International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers (SMART-TD) earlier this month filed a lawsuit against Amtrak, calling the policy “unlawful.” The unions say Amtrak has no authority to enforce a vaccination mandate among employees, and that doing so without negotiating with unions is a violation of federal labor law."
Finally, a union with a spine standing up for it's workers!
SonicFlyer is offline  
Old 12-06-2021, 07:43 AM
  #23  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,289
Default

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer View Post
Finally, a union with a spine standing up for it's workers!
Problem is there are LOT of airline pilots who are very much in favor of vaccine mandates, and firing the un-vaccinated (not me, don't shoot the messenger). Pilot unions are between a rock and a hard place between the two camps, it's been almost laughable watching mine navigate those waters.

APA and SWAPA with their Texas roots may have more of a mandate to oppose mandates, pun intended. Perhaps the rail union knows their constituents well?
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 12-06-2021, 10:13 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SonicFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 3,595
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Problem is there are LOT of airline pilots who are very much in favor of vaccine mandates, and firing the un-vaccinated (not me, don't shoot the messenger). Pilot unions are between a rock and a hard place between the two camps, it's been almost laughable watching mine navigate those waters.

APA and SWAPA with their Texas roots may have more of a mandate to oppose mandates, pun intended. Perhaps the rail union knows their constituents well?
Yeah, it is a risk to take the vax, it is a risk not to take the vax. Everyone has to decide for themselves what is right for their own bodies and their risk tolerance, especially since the "vaccine" isn't even really a vaccine (gene therapy) and doesn't stop transmission.
SonicFlyer is offline  
Old 12-06-2021, 10:43 AM
  #25  
Clear ECAM
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Posts: 886
Default

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer View Post
…especially since the "vaccine" isn't even really a vaccine (gene therapy) and doesn't stop transmission.
Hey can you explain to us exactly what it is about the vaccines that qualify them as gene therapy?

Please provide a source or stop spewing this uneducated nonsense.
ClncClarence is offline  
Old 12-06-2021, 12:06 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SonicFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 3,595
Question

Originally Posted by ClncClarence View Post
Hey can you explain to us exactly what it is about the vaccines that qualify them as gene therapy?
The injection modifies your genetics so that your body has a better response to the virus, as opposed to filling your lungs with fluid. As opposed to a more traditional vaccine which injects RNA of the virus so that your immune system will recognize it and fight the real thing. At least that's my understanding of the difference. Am I incorrect?
SonicFlyer is offline  
Old 12-06-2021, 12:08 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 910
Default

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer View Post
The injection modifies your genetics so that your body has a better response to the virus, as opposed to filling your lungs with fluid. As opposed to a more traditional vaccine which injects RNA of the virus so that your immune system will recognize it and fight the real thing. At least that's my understanding of the difference. Am I incorrect?
Yes. Very incorrect.
flyprdu is offline  
Old 12-06-2021, 01:11 PM
  #28  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer View Post
The injection modifies your genetics so that your body has a better response to the virus, as opposed to filling your lungs with fluid. As opposed to a more traditional vaccine which injects RNA of the virus so that your immune system will recognize it and fight the real thing. At least that's my understanding of the difference. Am I incorrect?
No, that's not even remotely correct.
Mesabah is offline  
Old 12-06-2021, 01:58 PM
  #29  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,289
Default

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer View Post
The injection modifies your genetics so that your body has a better response to the virus, as opposed to filling your lungs with fluid. As opposed to a more traditional vaccine which injects RNA of the virus so that your immune system will recognize it and fight the real thing. At least that's my understanding of the difference. Am I incorrect?
No. You're correct that you're incorrect.

There are I think one two vaccines in development which might actually qualify as gene therapy but they are not approved to my knowledge (certainly not in the US). The mRNA vaccines we have are not that.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 12-06-2021, 04:48 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,236
Default

There are some smart people saying they are more similar to a therapy than to a vaccine. Maybe not a gene therapy but closer to a therapy than a vaccine. As has been brought up before, the CDC only had to redefine vaccine so the current crop of medicine could still be called a vaccine:

https://technofog.substack.com/p/cdc...ion-of-vaccine

That doesn't inspire confidence.
Nantonaku is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hot Richard
Endeavor Air
805
02-28-2022 05:17 AM
FlyingBulldog
Military
42
04-19-2019 05:56 PM
vagabond
Money Talk
0
03-04-2007 11:17 AM
ryane946
Major
2
03-03-2007 11:20 AM
ryane946
Major
7
02-11-2007 10:06 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices