Military boosters coming?
#41
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,144
Likes: 802
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Unless congress gets really stoopid, those leaving under this circumstance will have to repay any upfront bonuses.
#42
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 3,690
Likes: 256
I could envision something similar (- the BCD), calculating the training cost for the remaining years of service to repaid. But even then, there are plenty of people who absent some negative characterization of their discharge, would look at that math and find it in their favor.
#43
Banned
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,982
Likes: 0
From: 3+ hour sit in the ATL
I was really taking about the AD commitments for pilots. While not common, at the service academies, you would get a real POS that did something so egregious, but wasn’t a jail-time offense. The services didn’t want them to serve, so they would get a big chicken dinner and have to repay the service for their commitment.
I could envision something similar (- the BCD), calculating the training cost for the remaining years of service to repaid. But even then, there are plenty of people who absent some negative characterization of their discharge, would look at that math and find it in their favor.
I could envision something similar (- the BCD), calculating the training cost for the remaining years of service to repaid. But even then, there are plenty of people who absent some negative characterization of their discharge, would look at that math and find it in their favor.
Go read the NDAA.
#44
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 3,690
Likes: 256
#45
Banned
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,982
Likes: 0
From: 3+ hour sit in the ATL
Focus, please.
#46
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 3,690
Likes: 256
That's not addressed in the NDAA. I have no idea what they'll do of course as that is way in the rear view mirror, but it would be a huge failure of leadership to allow a grift like that to occur.
#47
Banned
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,982
Likes: 0
From: 3+ hour sit in the ATL
Go read it. You are lying here - again.
So is the change in honorable versus LTH for jab mandate stuff.
Got some professional advice; before you stick your foot in your mouth, again. Go do some reading. Take about a month, then come back here. I'd be happy to provide you a professional reading list to assist you.
#48
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 3,690
Likes: 256
Yes it is.
Go read it. You are lying here - again.
So is the change in honorable versus LTH for jab mandate stuff.
Got some professional advice; before you stick your foot in your mouth, again. Go do some reading. Take about a month, then come back here. I'd be happy to provide you a professional reading list to assist you.
Go read it. You are lying here - again.
So is the change in honorable versus LTH for jab mandate stuff.
Got some professional advice; before you stick your foot in your mouth, again. Go do some reading. Take about a month, then come back here. I'd be happy to provide you a professional reading list to assist you.
Hopefully you’re not giving people advice of any consequence.
#49
Banned
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,982
Likes: 0
From: 3+ hour sit in the ATL
You’re having a discussion in your head again that only you are having. The NDAA discusses the characterization of a discharge, not the need to pay back bonuses, commitments, etc, Even a PALACE CHASE participant has to pay back funds they received when they don’t fulfill those commitments and that’s a supported program.
Hopefully you’re not giving people advice of any consequence.
Hopefully you’re not giving people advice of any consequence.
Don't change the floor.
#50
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 3,690
Likes: 256
A kid doing palace chase doing the exact same thing would have to pay down his obligation if he did not fulfill his commitment. You’d be cool with that? That’s nuts.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



