Supreme Court rejects vaccine challenge
01-10-2022, 11:44 AM
#21
Speed, Power, Accuracy
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: PIC
Posts: 1,702
Originally Posted by DeltaboundRedux
I think having the President's Chief of Staff publicly tweeting that the OSHA mandate was a "work around the Constitution" didn't go over very well with SCOTUS.
Ah Twitter. Sign up today, post anything you want, get fired for it 10 years later. What a fantastic product.
Ah Twitter. Sign up today, post anything you want, get fired for it 10 years later. What a fantastic product.
01-10-2022, 12:50 PM
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: Left seat on a kite
Posts: 1,884
Originally Posted by GeeWizDriver
Seems to me there are at least three that are totally cool with “working around the Constitution.” Perhaps one or three more…
01-10-2022, 01:42 PM
#23
Banned
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: 3+ hour sit in the ATL
Posts: 1,982
Originally Posted by rickair7777
Insight on the SCOTUS case, rumblings that they don't like the large-employer mandate...
https://www.newsnationnow.com/health...supreme-court/
https://www.newsnationnow.com/health...supreme-court/
I am probably going to eat crow on my prediction made here a few weeks ago.
Oh well, won't be the first time.
Pass me the Cholula Hot Sauce.
01-10-2022, 02:32 PM
#24
Speed, Power, Accuracy
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: PIC
Posts: 1,702
WTH is taking SCOTUS so long to issue the ruling?
Given the irrevocable nature of having taken a medication, time is of the essence here. It is why, regardless of your opinion on the matter, the injunction should have stood until SCOTUS ruled.
Although we don't yet have a mandate at my employer, part 1 of the OSHA ETS forces employees to reveal their vaxx status ASAP even as the Court wrestles with what should be a fairly straightforward issue. Even many of my vaxxed colleagues don't want to reveal their status because they don't GAS about the 1 day PTO bribe and they DON'T want to have to go to Canada right now. I don't blame them.
Given the irrevocable nature of having taken a medication, time is of the essence here. It is why, regardless of your opinion on the matter, the injunction should have stood until SCOTUS ruled.
Although we don't yet have a mandate at my employer, part 1 of the OSHA ETS forces employees to reveal their vaxx status ASAP even as the Court wrestles with what should be a fairly straightforward issue. Even many of my vaxxed colleagues don't want to reveal their status because they don't GAS about the 1 day PTO bribe and they DON'T want to have to go to Canada right now. I don't blame them.
01-10-2022, 02:39 PM
#26
Banned
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: 3+ hour sit in the ATL
Posts: 1,982
Originally Posted by GeeWizDriver
WTH is taking SCOTUS so long to issue the ruling?
Given the irrevocable nature of having taken a medication, time is of the essence here. It is why, regardless of your opinion on the matter, the injunction should have stood until SCOTUS ruled.
Although we don't yet have a mandate at my employer, part 1 of the OSHA ETS forces employees to reveal their vaxx status ASAP even as the Court wrestles with what should be a fairly straightforward issue. Even many of my vaxxed colleagues don't want to reveal their status because they don't GAS about the 1 day PTO bribe and they DON'T want to have to go to Canada right now. I don't blame them.
Given the irrevocable nature of having taken a medication, time is of the essence here. It is why, regardless of your opinion on the matter, the injunction should have stood until SCOTUS ruled.
Although we don't yet have a mandate at my employer, part 1 of the OSHA ETS forces employees to reveal their vaxx status ASAP even as the Court wrestles with what should be a fairly straightforward issue. Even many of my vaxxed colleagues don't want to reveal their status because they don't GAS about the 1 day PTO bribe and they DON'T want to have to go to Canada right now. I don't blame them.
Regardless, the wheels of justice do grind slow
01-10-2022, 03:00 PM
#28
Speed, Power, Accuracy
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: PIC
Posts: 1,702
Originally Posted by Drum
I thought OSHA ETS wasn't in full force until like 15 Feb or something like that?!
Regardless, the wheels of justice do grind slow
Regardless, the wheels of justice do grind slow
01-10-2022, 03:04 PM
#29
Speed, Power, Accuracy
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: PIC
Posts: 1,702
Originally Posted by Red Forman
I’m glad my employer has been dragging their feet on purpose waiting for the final decision to be made.
01-10-2022, 03:47 PM
#30
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2021
Posts: 414
Originally Posted by GeeWizDriver
Part 1 of the ETS was effective today forcing covered employees to reveal their vax status and if not vaxxed, to wear masks in all workplace settings. The deadline to actually have all employees vaxxed or start paying fines is February 9.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
