![]() |
Originally Posted by Danger Close
(Post 2504487)
Airbus has produced double bogey A320s in the past, I’m not sure the penalties. All of these aspects combined could be a 757 replacement.
New wings, a bit of a[737MAX9 to 737MAX10] stretch and possibly new gear, then you really have a 757 replacement and incidentally also the A321 NEO plus plus, which apparently is really a thing..on paper... |
So are Delta's going to be ETOPS? I see this replacing the 757 for thinner Europe routes. That may require Delta One, which may lead to these doing premium transcons.
|
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 2504488)
Actually, he wasn't. Had a discussion with the bus folks a couple months ago and they described the start up process identically. You probably misread (the usual)... the operative portion is "up to."
We're running ATL-LAX now with them with no performance issues... more power and going a lot farther on the same fuel would help, wouldn't it? |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 2504653)
I was referring to the thrust. They don’t make 35k. Depending on type for the 321NEO they are 32,000 to 33,100. The 757’S used across the pound have between 37,500 and 43,000 depending on variant.
https://www.safran-aircraft-engines.com/commercial-engines/single-aisle-commercial-jets/leap/leap-1a The a321neo also has a oew 16k-20k lbs less than 752. |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 2504728)
35,000 is what the engine manufacturer says...
https://www.safran-aircraft-engines....s/leap/leap-1a The a321neo also has a oew 16k-20k lbs less than 752. It’s amazing that 30 years later nothing matches the 757 in all around performance. |
Im guessing the 738 wuda gone out full and made the leg ok.
But its only a 160seat airframe. So maybe more frequency smaller airframes is good for a pilot list? :) I wud be curious if the wgt limit issue was driven by fuel for winds. Togw ratow limits. Or cargo payload offsets. Clt-lax is one of the legs piedmonts 727s had problems with. The 767 buy fixed that. |
Originally Posted by BobZ
(Post 2504752)
Im guessing the 738 wuda gone out full and made the leg ok.
But its only a 160seat airframe. So maybe more frequency smaller airframes is good for a pilot list? :) I wud be curious if the wgt limit issue was driven by fuel for winds. Togw ratow limits. Or cargo payload offsets. Clt-lax is one of the legs piedmonts 727s had problems with. The 767 buy fixed that. |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 2504733)
I got bumped last week jumpseating on a A321 CEO for weight flying CLT to LAX...
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 2504796)
Never made it onboard so don’t know the reason. I did tell the CA I was trying to jumpseat and she just shrugged her shoulders and walked down the jetway.
|
Bummer.......
|
Originally Posted by Bleeds On
(Post 2504805)
Sorry to derail the thread but why did you get bumped? JS doesn't count against load. I've ran into this a few times and I was always able to stay on.
I'm guessing she just didn't know the caveat. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:09 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands