Max pickup
#61
Hey Googles,
If you cant believe "we are having this conversation" you don't have to participate. Then you can say "I can't believe "you are" having this conversation.and I will politely tell you that you are not forced to participate or even read this if its not in your wheel house. But to insinuate that others concerns are petty because they aren't of interest to you is, well........_________?😁
If you cant believe "we are having this conversation" you don't have to participate. Then you can say "I can't believe "you are" having this conversation.and I will politely tell you that you are not forced to participate or even read this if its not in your wheel house. But to insinuate that others concerns are petty because they aren't of interest to you is, well........_________?😁
Others’ concerns are not “petty.” But the premise — that we should be able to fly to FAR’s — is at the very least disconcerting. The fact that union members would advocate for this is why I can’t believe we are having this conversation.
#62
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,128
Likes: 89
So ted,
If I understand your logic, only the tried/tested regional pilot is capable of 'seeing" the issues, and the ignorant military pilot is incapable of rational thought until you tell him what to think. You need to do this because you are a......seasoned professional?
How lovely, hope you don't use the same tact when approaching your spouse....it seems kinda patronizing 😉
If I understand your logic, only the tried/tested regional pilot is capable of 'seeing" the issues, and the ignorant military pilot is incapable of rational thought until you tell him what to think. You need to do this because you are a......seasoned professional?
How lovely, hope you don't use the same tact when approaching your spouse....it seems kinda patronizing 😉
I don't "need" to do anything...I do what I can to advocate for what I believe are pro-pilot and pro-union positions. My opinions are nothing more than that. If they or my delivery trigger you, so be it. But thanks for the marital advice... very helpful!
#63
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Goggles,
So is it then in your eyes problimatic to white slip? What about a green slip? Are you not “taking” a potential job away by doing that? I’m being sarcastic or maybe to you I’m not but if by me wanting to pick up some flying is “stealing” jobs then we’re not looking at this through the same lense. By that logic Let’s just staff up to 20k Pilots for staffing sake. ALPA will love it since they just added 6k more unions dues.but that has unintended consequences as well. That in turn harms us because if you look at it in it’s ultimate conclusion Deltas over bloated balance sheets (labor is the highest cost) would cause distrucive $ loss resulting most likely in a furlough come an economic downturn
So imo yes we should have the ability to have efficient staffing where we can drop/pickup as we like ( which we do at the moment) fleet depending which is an amazing QOL choice. I never said let’s just make FAR’s as they are as the limitation I’ll even agree that maybe a 90 max flight time be a limit. (Again not for bidding but for picking up trips)
I think in the end it’s almost zero sum. Some months I’ll drop trips because I want the time off. That is possible because at the same time someone else is willing to pick up my trip. I wanted to pick up a “qualified” two day trip later in the month (some one out there needs that off) I’m willing to pick it. Win win. Nope. Now it’ll go to a reserve guy who probably would have had that reserve day at home with his family, or the pilot trying to drop it will have to work it. So tell me how is that a fair deal in the end.
So is it then in your eyes problimatic to white slip? What about a green slip? Are you not “taking” a potential job away by doing that? I’m being sarcastic or maybe to you I’m not but if by me wanting to pick up some flying is “stealing” jobs then we’re not looking at this through the same lense. By that logic Let’s just staff up to 20k Pilots for staffing sake. ALPA will love it since they just added 6k more unions dues.but that has unintended consequences as well. That in turn harms us because if you look at it in it’s ultimate conclusion Deltas over bloated balance sheets (labor is the highest cost) would cause distrucive $ loss resulting most likely in a furlough come an economic downturn
So imo yes we should have the ability to have efficient staffing where we can drop/pickup as we like ( which we do at the moment) fleet depending which is an amazing QOL choice. I never said let’s just make FAR’s as they are as the limitation I’ll even agree that maybe a 90 max flight time be a limit. (Again not for bidding but for picking up trips)
I think in the end it’s almost zero sum. Some months I’ll drop trips because I want the time off. That is possible because at the same time someone else is willing to pick up my trip. I wanted to pick up a “qualified” two day trip later in the month (some one out there needs that off) I’m willing to pick it. Win win. Nope. Now it’ll go to a reserve guy who probably would have had that reserve day at home with his family, or the pilot trying to drop it will have to work it. So tell me how is that a fair deal in the end.
#64
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,869
Likes: 187
Call the pilot with the qualified trip in open time and have him put it on the swap board. Problem solved.
I can assure you that when the limits are raised a high percentage of pilots will fly to those limits. The job loss will be staggering if we fly to FAR’s.
I can assure you that when the limits are raised a high percentage of pilots will fly to those limits. The job loss will be staggering if we fly to FAR’s.
#65
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
That’s a great idea. I’ll remeber that going forward. However I don’t want to swap my 4 day for a 2 day since that doesn’t really help in this case.
Trust me I totally see your point. And I’ll even concede in that I agree it can cause harm. I just wish there was some middle ground here. That’s mostly my point.
#66
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,869
Likes: 187
Sailing,
That’s a great idea. I’ll remeber that going forward. However I don’t want to swap my 4 day for a 2 day since that doesn’t really help in this case.
Trust me I totally see your point. And I’ll even concede in that I agree it can cause harm. I just wish there was some middle ground here. That’s mostly my point.
That’s a great idea. I’ll remeber that going forward. However I don’t want to swap my 4 day for a 2 day since that doesn’t really help in this case.
Trust me I totally see your point. And I’ll even concede in that I agree it can cause harm. I just wish there was some middle ground here. That’s mostly my point.
Our current productivity puts us inline with AMR and UAL but well below SWA. We really don’t want to become SWA. If you’re in the bottom 2000 on the seniority list you might wind up on the street.
#67
#68
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Ok, all good points.This discussion probably blew up more than I expected. I’m not that die hard for this as much as it appears. It would be nice for me to pick up more flying when I wish but if where we are today is far better than where we used to be then it’s a great first world problem. I certainly hope though that this remains. I’m not the kind of person that believes in limiting our abilities to fly more so we can just grow the list. That is also a disservice to the current workforce. If that is something you guys can at least acknowledge then I think we are on the same page. Good discussion.
#69
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,192
Likes: 10
From: Petting Zoo
#70
Line Holder

Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,292
Likes: 37
We are already in the middle ground. We granted massive productivity concessions to the company from 99 through 2005. We have clawed back a percentage of that but nothing near where we once were. To put it into perspective the work rules back then produced a average block hour total per pilot around 600 hours per year. I believe that number is currently around 800 hours per year. We have increased productivity on the order of 25%. The 800 hour number is from around 2016 so may be slightly lower with this contract. Still the job loss has been massive.
Our current productivity puts us inline with AMR and UAL but well below SWA. We really don’t want to become SWA. If you’re in the bottom 2000 on the seniority list you might wind up on the street.
Our current productivity puts us inline with AMR and UAL but well below SWA. We really don’t want to become SWA. If you’re in the bottom 2000 on the seniority list you might wind up on the street.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



