Search

Notices

Max pickup

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-11-2018 | 08:42 AM
  #21  
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,252
Likes: 95
From: DAL 330
Default

Originally Posted by Buck Rogers
You misunderstand,

This in not against the union at all. In fact it is the opposite. I fully support the union and the collective bargaining agreement that was membership ratified....You know , the one that has allowed us to fly back vacation and swap with the pot above ALV+15. It has been the status quo (because it has been in effect since around PBS intro....so a lot of years) for a long, long time.

So, if the membership wants to tweak provisions that materially effects bidding seniority, I have no problem....just allow at least 2 years prior to implementation so I can bid to a category that pays much more hourly because my category super seniority will be worth much less.

I'm always thankful that there is a way for me to easily dump a trip on the swap board when there isn't reserve coverage, as well as the ability to pick a trip up


The bit about the union is in reference to bygone era's (stories from my dad) where the employees would go down to the union hall and get all spooled up and then take a strike vote based on emotion and beer....you know...kinda like the mindless drivel and angst about the union "studying", "exploring" ways to increase retirement income and then it gets bastardized into something unrecognizable here on the forum. My union would be negligent NOT to at least explore opportunities for more and present them to us in an impartial manner.

As with most PWA issues there are trade-offs. I bet some of the guys who were recently displaced from various categories might have a different philosophy about some guys flying 90+ hours each month.

Then again many Pilots can't seem to see a connection between these two issues.

Scoop
Reply
Old 05-11-2018 | 09:14 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,576
Likes: 33
Default

Or they see the correlation and acknowledge that it s already baked in due to long standing status quo

It appears that the naive pilot that bids the very bottom of the list to try to increase hits revenue, and then wants to change the rules, is complicit in trying to gore someone else's ox to line their pocket(who's being greedy now)?

It is only the new hire that is at the bottom of a category list thru no fault of their own....all(mostly) other have chosen their poison.

Scoop, I know, I know....the union needs to protect us from ourselves. Let's start with 12 hours bottle to throttle! Slippery slope, isn't it? I mean that would be for the good of all pilots wouldn't it?
Reply
Old 05-11-2018 | 09:52 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,823
Likes: 166
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by OOfff
It’s the same amount of work you’d have in any 80 hour month
True, except you've basically nullified your vacation. Guess that's no a huge deal since the vacation "week" is usually only 4 days but still.

Let's get rid of all work rules and FAR's for that matter, and let the go-getters fly to whatever "IMSAFE" standards they want, for great success.
Reply
Old 05-11-2018 | 10:04 AM
  #24  
Viking busdvr's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 852
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop
As with most PWA issues there are trade-offs. I bet some of the guys who were recently displaced from various categories might have a different philosophy about some guys flying 90+ hours each month.

Then again many Pilots can't seem to see a connection between these two issues.

Scoop
I don’t know about that Scoop- When I was furloughed I seem to recall my “union” telling me and my fellow furloughees that flying high-time has NO EFFECT on pilot staffing... Were they incorrect about that?
Reply
Old 05-11-2018 | 10:10 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,576
Likes: 33
Default

So, if I fly a 13 day trip that is a spill over trip and block in on the the first day of the new bid month with 35 hours of credit for the 1 day in the month....and I have 2 weeks vacation worth 49 hours starting on the 18th...my total pay time is 84 hours. Just how many days off do I need in that month...i have 29 days off...worked 1 day, and somehow that offends your sensibilities that I fly back that vacation time in the next 17 days. If that is working too hard, then stay home. Just don't try to insinuate that I am depriving other's of faster advancement because I am the one who is greedy.

I bid a base/equipment/position based on a lot of factors. When you want to change the game...fine. As I said before, just allow a couple of years for pilots to account for the paradigm shift and get positioned into their new utopia
Reply
Old 05-11-2018 | 10:15 AM
  #26  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
True, except you've basically nullified your vacation. Guess that's no a huge deal since the vacation "week" is usually only 4 days but still.

Let's get rid of all work rules and FAR's for that matter, and let the go-getters fly to whatever "IMSAFE" standards they want, for great success.
Are you seriously suggesting that the max pickup limit is a result of a search for safety?
Reply
Old 05-11-2018 | 10:16 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Buck Rogers
Or they see the correlation and acknowledge that it s already baked in due to long standing status quo

It appears that the naive pilot that bids the very bottom of the list to try to increase hits revenue, and then wants to change the rules, is complicit in trying to gore someone else's ox to line their pocket(who's being greedy now)?

It is only the new hire that is at the bottom of a category list thru no fault of their own....all(mostly) other have chosen their poison.

Scoop, I know, I know....the union needs to protect us from ourselves. Let's start with 12 hours bottle to throttle! Slippery slope, isn't it? I mean that would be for the good of all pilots wouldn't it?
My initial gut feeling is to agree with this. As I've said before, if we're talking about exceeding max pickup via swap board, it's flexibility that is completely controlled by the pilot. If we're talking about the C2012 gem of reserve assignment to ALV+15, we're talking about flexibility allowing more productivity completely controlled by the company. Which is worse? Scoop's going to come on here and say "but no one get's assigned to 99 hours on reserve". While that's debatable, the fact that the company can (and has been regularly) assigning reserve guys to ANYTHING above ALV - even one minute - should be a huge problem for people. But senior guys who have a choice of line or reserve, can't see that argument unless it affects their pay check.
Reply
Old 05-11-2018 | 10:35 AM
  #28  
Dirtdiver's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
From: 767A
Default

All the guys finding ways to crank out way over max pick up, I sure hope aren’t also complaining about slow upgrades!
Reply
Old 05-11-2018 | 10:39 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,576
Likes: 33
Default

Dirtdiver,
"complaining about slow upgrades!"

What the eff you talking bout Willis?
Reply
Old 05-11-2018 | 10:42 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Dirtdiver
All the guys finding ways to crank out way over max pick up, I sure hope aren’t also complaining about slow upgrades!
I'll bet there are more complaints coming from guys that have upgraded to junior captain and don't see more junior guys showing up below them on the list.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Raptor
FedEx
132
07-20-2016 05:08 PM
MikeF16
Delta
10
04-24-2016 11:21 AM
bay982
Southwest
23
03-30-2016 04:29 AM
MoneyMan
Cargo
25
02-04-2008 05:42 PM
mzkat1979
Hangar Talk
972
07-17-2006 10:01 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices