Operation is running on red line
08-09-2019 | 03:49 PM
#271
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,556
Likes: 11
08-10-2019 | 05:50 AM
#272
Cloudbase
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 565
Likes: 28
From: 717A
So on a reserve 4 day GS where only day 1 is over an X day. Day 2 was originally a 30 hour layover. Day 1 they rerouted us to delay 2 flights instead of 1, as they do, to add a previously non-existing duty period on day 2, which also was the original first day of reserve. Do I get anything for the reroute or am I limited to the above guarantee of day 1? I know on reserve generally the answer is no, but wasn't sure if that's different since the last leg of the X day portion of the GS is where the RR started.
08-10-2019 | 06:08 AM
#273
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,127
Likes: 89
So on a reserve 4 day GS where only day 1 is over an X day. Day 2 was originally a 30 hour layover. Day 1 they rerouted us to delay 2 flights instead of 1, as they do, to add a previously non-existing duty period on day 2, which also was the original first day of reserve. Do I get anything for the reroute or am I limited to the above guarantee of day 1? I know on reserve generally the answer is no, but wasn't sure if that's different since the last leg of the X day portion of the GS is where the RR started.
08-10-2019 | 06:11 AM
#274
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,556
Likes: 11
So on a reserve 4 day GS where only day 1 is over an X day. Day 2 was originally a 30 hour layover. Day 1 they rerouted us to delay 2 flights instead of 1, as they do, to add a previously non-existing duty period on day 2, which also was the original first day of reserve. Do I get anything for the reroute or am I limited to the above guarantee of day 1? I know on reserve generally the answer is no, but wasn't sure if that's different since the last leg of the X day portion of the GS is where the RR started.
08-10-2019 | 10:30 AM
#275
Cloudbase
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 565
Likes: 28
From: 717A
Don't think that applies. Was delayed coming into msp due to the previous CA not knowing how to write things up, basically and then not answering his phone. We could have made it on time to our 30 hour layover but the sodomizer apparently chose to send us to Fargo instead, double deadhead today.
08-10-2019 | 11:39 AM
#276
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
From: 73na
Don't think that applies. Was delayed coming into msp due to the previous CA not knowing how to write things up, basically and then not answering his phone. We could have made it on time to our 30 hour layover but the sodomizer apparently chose to send us to Fargo instead, double deadhead today.
08-10-2019 | 12:30 PM
#277
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,823
Likes: 166
From: window seat
The FO doing it as a tradition/courtesy is a relic that needs to go the way of the one ear on one ear off shouting nonsense. Captain's ship, Captain does the book FO reviews.
08-10-2019 | 12:37 PM
#278
Banned
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
08-10-2019 | 12:39 PM
#279
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
From: 73na
Vol.1 specifies the interior inspection is the FO’s checklist, which includes logbook signoff, verifying MDM limititations, ETOPS signoff, etc. While all crew members are required to review the logbook, the administrative duties associated with the logbook fall squarely on the FO. (At least on the 737).
08-10-2019 | 12:39 PM
#280
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Disagree. Why don't we all act like we're responsible for the flight, checking everything that could be a gotcha for everyone, so we can back each other up and be ready to upgrade when the time comes? I did my best to check everything I could as an FO, and I appreciate when my FO's do the same. It's not about ego. There's only one person in command, but we all have a stake.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
