Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Scope Committee Pacific Update >

Scope Committee Pacific Update

Search

Notices

Scope Committee Pacific Update

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-06-2019 | 02:45 PM
  #41  
Line Holder
Liked
20 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 121
Default

The strange thing about this one Korean flight from Japan to Honolulu, is that about 2-3 months ago, ALPA and the company discovered a JV issue with Aeromexico on a MEX-LAX flight that originally had an Aeromexico 787 on it. It was swapped to a Delta 320 by the company to ensure the violation didn't occur. So why hasn't this happened on the Korean route?
Reply
Old 09-06-2019 | 03:19 PM
  #42  
Denny Crane's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 6,971
Likes: 0
From: Kickin’ Back
Default

It warms my heart to see the responses of everyone (except one) to the OP. As Scoop said, a violation is a violation. It doesn’t matter how big or small. Frankly any Scope violation is a big deal. If you believe JG’s “story” then you need your head examined.

I also disagree with ERflyer in that I want to know of each Scope violation. His characterization that these are coming everyday is simply not true and even if it were that would mean the company is violating it daily which is even worse!

Denny
Reply
Old 09-06-2019 | 03:25 PM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 2,908
Likes: 102
Default

Originally Posted by ERflyer
A better strategy would be a monthly (not daily) summary of violations and implement a better strategy: grieve them and negotiate a new TA.
I guess from my perspective im reading every couple company emails that the union is wrong via email, which the company started back in June (?). I would expect one response email at least from the union for every company one. Is that reasonable? I wouldnt want to go through a month if its multiple emails before i see a worded response. Besides if the company figures out the response timing each month they send one thirty minute prior and we wait more than 30 days for a response.

I dont know why the company is choosing to legislate this over email newsletters but if theyre trying to get arguments in early the arbitrator doesnt do anything for free. More likely the company isnt liking their chances with the arbitrator and theyre looking for a deal so they can yank the arbitration date in hopes of a refund before the confirmation window hits.
Reply
Old 09-06-2019 | 03:33 PM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,872
Likes: 189
Default

Originally Posted by marcal
The strange thing about this one Korean flight from Japan to Honolulu, is that about 2-3 months ago, ALPA and the company discovered a JV issue with Aeromexico on a MEX-LAX flight that originally had an Aeromexico 787 on it. It was swapped to a Delta 320 by the company to ensure the violation didn't occur. So why hasn't this happened on the Korean route?
The company does not believe it’s a violation. A arbitrator is going to decide. Results should be out soon.
Reply
Old 09-06-2019 | 04:39 PM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,556
Likes: 11
Default

Originally Posted by Trip7
2500 block hours USA-Japan are not coming back anytime soon. Narita is Dead. The company would probably rather just pay us the cost to operate the 2500 hours than add those block hours to Japan unnecessarily.

Again by no means am I saying ignore it. We can either keep whining about a violation that will never get fixed or use it as leverage for greater gains. Or we can wait for the Arbitrator determined settlement, which history has shown, will likely be in the Company's favor. Reference the 350 Delivery Grievance

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
this is the flaw in your philosophy...you think we should just give SCOPE away, use it for 'greater gains'...there are NO greater gains than scope.
Reply
Old 09-06-2019 | 04:40 PM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,556
Likes: 11
Default

Originally Posted by theUpsideDown
Sycophancy is the motive. He wants to be an obvious management shill while trying to keep some legitimacy with his own pilot group so he can say things like, "well i dont agree with the pilots but I always listen, and thats my leadership style really, I agree with whoever I want to be in charge of me next, while trying not to embarass myself with the pilots i still have to fly with."
the irony is they have even said he's too over the top for them...
Reply
Old 09-06-2019 | 04:41 PM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,556
Likes: 11
Default

Originally Posted by ERflyer
Yes there are scope violations. I don’t really need an email, or several of them, every time there is a violation increase of one. Obviously the intent is to fire up the troops for Section 6 negotiations. Consider us fired up.

I believe what Trip 7 is getting at is that this MEC would be better off truly negotiating rather than screaming “Scope violation!” once a week, or daily it seems. It has very little impact on the desired result we all want and makes the MEC look shrill and impotent.

A better strategy would be a monthly (not daily) summary of violations and implement a better strategy: grieve them and negotiate a new TA.
whereas the previous regimes would not inform the pilots of scope violations and tell the company 'it's ok just don't let it happen again' over and over and over....i'll stick with what this admin is doing.
Reply
Old 09-06-2019 | 04:48 PM
  #48  
Han Solo's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,657
Likes: 0
From: Fastest Hunk of Junk in the Galaxy
Default

Originally Posted by ERflyer
I believe what Trip 7 is getting at is that this MEC would be better off truly negotiating rather than screaming “Scope violation!” once a week, or daily it seems. It has very little impact on the desired result we all want and makes the MEC look shrill and impotent.
Me on the other hand, I wish the company would quit regularly violating the contract so the union wouldn't have to scream about it on a weekly basis. Call me crazy.
Reply
Old 09-06-2019 | 05:46 PM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 2,908
Likes: 102
Default

Originally Posted by tunes
the irony is they have even said he's too over the top for them...
Wow. Thats gotta hurt.
Reply
Old 09-06-2019 | 07:18 PM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Default

Every contract cycle we have a few pilots come on social media and attempt to lower pilot expectations.

Trip7 and whoever is writing his posts has sunk to a new low.

Management is returning billions to our shareholders as we speak. They run an air line that goes day after day without canceling a flight.

They are more than capable of complying with the scope they agreed to. They are more than capable of upgrading technology to automatically pay reroute and OE.

Our leaders are laser focused on enforcing our PWA and attaining a C2019 with major gains across the board.

I have zero doubt they will succeed.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Turbanpilot
American
1446
12-24-2014 05:31 PM
TANSTAAFL
Major
728
10-30-2013 01:18 PM
YXnot
Major
1077
02-18-2011 09:17 PM
AAflyer
Major
101
03-27-2010 06:39 AM
PEACH
Major
14
11-07-2009 08:20 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices