Notices

Nov/dec ae

Old 11-22-2019, 07:49 PM
  #1191  
Back on Reserve
 
captkdobbs's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Position: A330 FO
Posts: 728
Default

Originally Posted by Big E 757
I didn’t see any MSP 7ERB displacements. Did enough guys bid off voluntarily that they didn’t need to displace anyone?
Originally Posted by notEnuf
Correct, several bid CA on the 73N and 717 as well as 330B. Some went out of base and 2 even got MSP7ERA
17AE out and 2 Reinstatement's back IN on the B side. They got the 15 position reduction without MDs.
captkdobbs is offline  
Old 11-22-2019, 07:52 PM
  #1192  
Gets Weekends Off
 
crazyjaydawg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: Middle Seat
Posts: 1,231
Default

Originally Posted by Xray678
in the ATL 330A, there were no posted vacancies, three people bid out and they awarded six. There are other categories that has the same thing. I always thought they could not award more than posted and/or contingency vacancies. Obviously I’m wrong but have never noticed this before. But it does explain all the movement generated from a bid with only 14 wide body captains posted.


I *think* this is where bypasses get a little weird. 6 ATL330A bid out - 3 of these got training bypass, but they’re still considered out for the purpose of the AE.

That left the door open for 6 to be awarded (actually 8 if you consider the 2 bypasses).

This is why bypasses have a snowball effect on others that will get paid more, but it is saving the resource of training time for the company which is (in their calculations) far more expensive.
crazyjaydawg is offline  
Old 11-22-2019, 08:48 PM
  #1193  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Posts: 96
Default

(CJO holder on the outside looking in. Tentative 6 Jan indoc date.)

Rumor has it ATL320B went much more junior (~14,200) this round with ATL73N near it (~14,400). Any truth to this? Is WidgetSeniority.com already updated with the latest AE results?

Trying to decide on whether to bid straight to ATL88B or roll the dice on another airframe hoping to keep my NYC time short.

How do displacements work as DAL parks 88s? Through the AE process?
ColoradoAviator is offline  
Old 11-23-2019, 01:16 AM
  #1194  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,159
Default

Originally Posted by Xray678
in the ATL 330A, there were no posted vacancies, three people bid out and they awarded six. There are other categories that has the same thing. I always thought they could not award more than posted and/or contingency vacancies. Obviously I’m wrong but have never noticed this before. But it does explain all the movement generated from a bid with only 14 wide body captains posted.
As crazyjawdawg pointed out, 6 people bid out (3 awarded AEs and 3 bypassed awards to the A350) so it was a net of zero and, therefore, technically they did not award more than was posted to include contingency vacancies.
FL370esq is offline  
Old 11-23-2019, 03:47 AM
  #1195  
Moderator
 
crewdawg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,890
Default

Originally Posted by FL370esq
As crazyjawdawg pointed out, 6 people bid out (3 awarded AEs and 3 bypassed awards to the A350) so it was a net of zero and, therefore, technically they did not award more than was posted to include contingency vacancies.
This is a classic example of why it's important to always have a bid in (with % caveats) on every bid. You just never know how much will be awarded via backfills.
crewdawg is offline  
Old 11-23-2019, 05:04 AM
  #1196  
Roll’n Thunder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: Pilot
Posts: 3,891
Default

Originally Posted by ColoradoAviator
(CJO holder on the outside looking in. Tentative 6 Jan indoc date.)

Rumor has it ATL320B went much more junior (~14,200) this round with ATL73N near it (~14,400). Any truth to this? Is WidgetSeniority.com already updated with the latest AE results?

Trying to decide on whether to bid straight to ATL88B or roll the dice on another airframe hoping to keep my NYC time short.

How do displacements work as DAL parks 88s? Through the AE process?
What's your long term goal, to hold ATL? On a specific airplane? A displaced pilot can go anywhere there is someone junior to them to bump out. The 88 draw down in ATL, which has come in fits and starts, has somewhat warped what's going on in ATL. As the fleet has shrunk you've had mid-high level FO's bailing to better fleets (320, 757, even to some CA positions) and junior ones bailing to get off the bottom. Supposedly in May the big axe will come down and the vast majority of the 88 pilots will be displaced off. Until that award is final there's no way to tell how things will shake out. If you bid NYC 320 hoping to get ATL it might take a while if a large chunk of senior 88 FO's get displaced ove to the 320, potentially even kicking out the junior people to other fleets and/or bases. Once that bid is complete ATL should return to a more normalized seniority progression across all the fleets.
tennisguru is online now  
Old 11-23-2019, 05:32 AM
  #1197  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: 7ERA
Posts: 1,235
Default

Originally Posted by crazyjaydawg
I *think* this is where bypasses get a little weird. 6 ATL330A bid out - 3 of these got training bypass, but they’re still considered out for the purpose of the AE.

That left the door open for 6 to be awarded (actually 8 if you consider the 2 bypasses).

I think you may be on to something. I would have never considered someone on a bypass as having left the category. I wonder if the new thing they show on the bypass results.....NBCRET....comes into play.
Xray678 is offline  
Old 11-23-2019, 05:34 AM
  #1198  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Posts: 96
Default

TennisGuru, thank you very much for that information! It's very helpful when filing out our "drop sheets" before Indoc.

As you correctly deduced my goals are: 1) get to ATL to make the wife happy (she's from the area) and 2) fly a more comfortable airplane without an additional trip through training. I had not considered the effects of the -88 drawdown pushing ATL320B more and more senior. With that information the option to go straight to the -88 and ride it off into the sunset makes more and more sense.

On a broader note: thanks to TennisGuru and the rest of the Delta APC folks. My questions have always been met with a quick, friendly, and flame-free response. It speaks volumes to the character of the community. Again, thank you!
ColoradoAviator is offline  
Old 11-23-2019, 05:40 AM
  #1199  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MoonShot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,058
Default

Originally Posted by ColoradoAviator
TennisGuru, thank you very much for that information! It's very helpful when filing out our "drop sheets" before Indoc.

As you correctly deduced my goals are: 1) get to ATL to make the wife happy (she's from the area) and 2) fly a more comfortable airplane without an additional trip through training. I had not considered the effects of the -88 drawdown pushing ATL320B more and more senior. With that information the option to go straight to the -88 and ride it off into the sunset makes more and more sense.

On a broader note: thanks to TennisGuru and the rest of the Delta APC folks. My questions have always been met with a quick, friendly, and flame-free response. It speaks volumes to the character of the community. Again, thank you!
Remember too, you are at the mercy of what aircraft/bases are available to your class.
MoonShot is offline  
Old 11-23-2019, 05:42 AM
  #1200  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,689
Default

Originally Posted by tennisguru
What's your long term goal, to hold ATL? On a specific airplane? A displaced pilot can go anywhere there is someone junior to them to bump out. The 88 draw down in ATL, which has come in fits and starts, has somewhat warped what's going on in ATL. As the fleet has shrunk you've had mid-high level FO's bailing to better fleets (320, 757, even to some CA positions) and junior ones bailing to get off the bottom. Supposedly in May the big axe will come down and the vast majority of the 88 pilots will be displaced off. Until that award is final there's no way to tell how things will shake out. If you bid NYC 320 hoping to get ATL it might take a while if a large chunk of senior 88 FO's get displaced ove to the 320, potentially even kicking out the junior people to other fleets and/or bases. Once that bid is complete ATL should return to a more normalized seniority progression across all the fleets.
Airbuses production problems are continuing. Were it not for the Max it would be getting a lot more press. (When the heat is on someone else it’s not on you!). The 88 may have more life at Delta than some believe.
sailingfun is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jetlaggy
UPS
26
12-07-2018 02:49 PM
jetlaggy
UPS
6
09-12-2018 01:36 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices