If the MEC approves the deal it will go to full MEMRAT. Not a shortened vote timeline. But the full duration vote window. We will decide if it passes. Not the MEC.

while I don’t disagree with the sentiment, millennials are usually defined as people born between 1980-1995. Most people don’t realize that older millennials turn 40 in 2020.

From the best I can tell, many in the boomer generation (b1946-1965) were hired at a major around the time they were 30, that is simply not true anymore

1981-1996! 1980 is still genX. Thank goodness!

Most of the angst about any DZer retirement improvements came from

Concerning the voluntary TA, are you sure about that? I’m only asking because I’ve read an LEC response suggesting otherwise, I.e. that the measures are voluntary and therefore should easily pass an MEC vote, and will be approved without delay since its voluntary (no MEMRAT).

The irony that 90% of the pilot group didnt want concessions? And yet that same group (furlough group) make up 20% of the total? There for 50% of said group is not for concessions. Not sure how you could draw irony about that but, Einstein was quite good with numbers, you clearly are not.

are you talking about the 220 deal (voluntarily measures only) or the other deal that details are not known yet?

honest question, why would a voluntary measures only LOA have to go to MEMRAT?

Because it doesn't benefit them so clearly it's a concession to help others.

Why do the demographics of the 1721 matter? Serious question, not throwing shade. I’m wondering what difference it makes is all.

It doesnt but someone above wanted to know. The only reason I can figure out of their post was they were trying to decide how deserving the group was. As if they wanted to compare their story against the potential furlough group.