Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   1721 (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/131103-1721.html)

jumppilot 09-21-2020 07:13 AM


Originally Posted by Scoop (Post 3133135)
Well if the UAL deal is truly as bad as you say it will crash and burn in MEMRAT. You are only looking at the MPG but not factoring in the thousands of displacement cancellations. Hundreds of UAL Pilots will be making Captains pay while potentially flying as FO. Thousands will be working instead of being furloughed. It may not be all good, but it sure as hell aint all bad.

Are we really supposed to lose much sleep over Pilots who base their budgets on PS and GS's?

Scoop

UAL guy here. I voted yes because I can actually live on less pay and want the extra time off. Don’t forget, this isn’t less pay for the same days of work - it’s less days of work at the same hourly rate.

I heard Delta pulled a bait-and-switch on your SILs. That’s too bad, becauee I’ve been on one since March and learned I actually can live on 50 hours a month.

With this LOA, I’ll be working 11 days a month now on a NB. Sign me up.

I understand why pilots are voting no, but the above are my (selfish) reasons for voting yes.

beernutt 09-21-2020 07:44 AM


Originally Posted by NuGuy (Post 3133144)
Going to waive the BS flag on this. 40ish new hires is nothing new. The average age in my new hire class was 45, all civilian and that was 1999.

Anyone who thinks this is new or out of the ordinary has been living in a very small bubble for the last 20 years.

Were you hired in MSP or ATL? Very different demographics. For example, in my new hire class in 2000 I was the civilian ‘experiment’. Until the 2014 boom Delta new hire classes were overwhelmingly MIL and average age of ~35.

Gone Flying 09-21-2020 07:55 AM


Originally Posted by Scoop (Post 3133135)
Well if the UAL deal is truly as bad as you say it will crash and burn in MEMRAT. You are only looking at the MPG but not factoring in the thousands of displacement cancellations. Hundreds of UAL Pilots will be making Captains pay while potentially flying as FO. Thousands will be working instead of being furloughed. It may not be all good, but it sure as hell aint all bad.

Are we really supposed to lose much sleep over Pilots who base their budgets on PS and GS's?

Scoop

^^^^this^^^^^

I've seen so many people talk about the hours cuts while ignoring the thousands of displacements that get undone. while not everyone was displaced it certainly affected a huge portion of the pilot group at UAL. Since far fewer DL pilots % wise are under the threat of furlough, a similar plan here should require a lot smaller hours cuts. the way their plan is laid out it seems to make sense to me. we will see when UAL pilots vote on it.

DWC CAP10 USAF 09-21-2020 08:58 AM


Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 3133089)
We have had pilots in the past complain that mil pilots exceeded the 5 year limit, locked down a great mil retirement and then bumped them back when they returned. This in part led the company to track the 5 year limit. In addition the company has financial obligations to mil leave pilots that are substantial.

Tracking the 5 year limit is kind of a USERRA thing, so....

A peson getting bumped is BS....the person on MIL leave is above them on the list whether they are actively flying or not.

The financial obligations are an issue when they return from MIL leave.....if the company doesn't survive until that point, the financial obligation is moo...and they would have paid those financial oligaitons (PS, 401K, etc) even if the peson didn't take MIL leave....so it just changes WHEN they pay them.

NuGuy 09-21-2020 08:59 AM


Originally Posted by beernutt (Post 3133179)
Were you hired in MSP or ATL? Very different demographics. For example, in my new hire class in 2000 I was the civilian ‘experiment’. Until the 2014 boom Delta new hire classes were overwhelmingly MIL and average age of ~35.

It shouldn’t matter. Anyone with the tiniest amount of SA of the industry should know.

sailingfun 09-21-2020 09:02 AM


Originally Posted by DWC CAP10 USAF (Post 3133250)
Tracking the 5 year limit is kind of a USERRA thing, so....

A peson getting bumped is BS....the person on MIL leave is above them on the list whether they are actively flying or not.

The financial obligations are an issue when they return from MIL leave.....if the company doesn't survive until that point, the financial obligation is moo...and they would have paid those financial oligaitons (PS, 401K, etc) even if the peson didn't take MIL leave....so it just changes WHEN they pay them.

They were supposed to be removed from the list after 5 years. Delta always ignored this in the past. If a pilot should have been removed from the list and returned many felt they were being bumped down.

CX500T 09-21-2020 09:03 AM

That's been my experience. Most of the ER captains I foew with were all hired around or before 30, and many were shocked that I wasn't hired at that age since I didn't retire from the military.

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

Schwanker 09-21-2020 09:10 AM


Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 3133254)
They were supposed to be removed from the list after 5 years. Delta always ignored this in the past. If a pilot should have been removed from the list and returned many felt they were being bumped down.

USSERA protects your position for a minimum of five years. There are exemptions which provides longer protection. There is no obligation for Delta to remove anyone if they exceed 5 years.

Banzai 09-21-2020 09:13 AM


Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 3133254)
They were supposed to be removed from the list after 5 years. Delta always ignored this in the past. If a pilot should have been removed from the list and returned many felt they were being bumped down.

A fraction of 1% might have slipped through the cracks on this, which is poor justification for the overall treatment of mil pilots, and no justification at all for not waiving USERRA caps right now.

During GWOT it’s very easy to do way more than 5 years anyway. 38 USC spells out the current exemptions quite clearly.

Banzai 09-21-2020 09:17 AM


Originally Posted by Schwanker (Post 3133262)
USSERA protects your position for a minimum of five years. There are exemptions which provides longer protection. There is no obligation for Delta to remove anyone if they exceed 5 years.

This too. USERRA protects the service member from termination within that timeframe. It does not, however, dictate that the civilian employer must fire the employee after 5 years cumulative. It just no longer expressly prohibits adverse action.
#240


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:18 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands