Originally Posted by ppping (Post 3132857)

https://unitedcontract.org/home

Nicely out together site for UAL.

Originally Posted by PSFT (Post 3132907)

I’ve been told by people that there half the information is incorrect. So yeah, “nicely put together.”

Originally Posted by Schwanker (Post 3132897)

Directly from the Delta ALPA policy manual:

“All other amendments to the PWA (side letters of agreement) that have been recommended for approval by a majority vote of the MEC shall be subject to membership ratification.”

Doesn’t differentiate whether voluntary or not.

Originally Posted by MJP27 (Post 3132917)

ummmm, ok. That didn’t stop the VEOP without it going MEMRAT. What makes you think it’ll be different this time? Hint: it won’t be.

Originally Posted by ppping (Post 3132914)

Hey when their ALPA is hamstrung by NDAs and hasn’t been able to put out anything it’s left to pilots to critically think. As I hope we will. Side with the company. It has worked so well in the past!

Originally Posted by LEROY JENKINS (Post 3130891)

Has anyone seen any data on the demographics of the 1721 now on the chopping block? Now that the MEC has confirmed it's looking at "at temporary modifications to the contract", I'd like to know more details on this group. How many are still in the Guard or Reserves? What's the age breakdown? How many have families? Now that the camel has a nose underneath the tent this is important information when considering any modification to the PWA.

Originally Posted by PSFT (Post 3132922)

Nothing I said indicates I’m siding with the company. I said the United website contains false information. And I believe in educating myself properly.

Originally Posted by ppping (Post 3132926)

I couldn’t agree more. I don’t take anything at face value. It’s unfortunate since we pay a lot of money to ALPA. I just want unbiased information to make a decision. If I don’t have it then I want our PWA to stand as it is.

Originally Posted by Gone Flying (Post 3132924)

I know this was asked a few days ago but I did look up the age demographics of everyone hired on or after 9/25/2017

Over 40 on 1/1/2021- 561
35-39 on 1/1/2021- 599
30-34 on 1/1/2021- 384
under 30 on 1/1/2021- 177

TL;DR most in the furlough range are 35 or over, no idea on family or guard/reserve activity

Originally Posted by Der Meister (Post 3132943)

So the majority are not whining entitled millenials like the DZ guys want everyone to think. Almost as if they had no idea what they were talking about, once again...