35 Large RJs coming back?
#101
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,869
Likes: 188
Exception two: In the event the hiring or flow provisions of NWA LOA 2006-10 or LOA #9 cease to be available, either at the feeder carrier affiliate referenced in such LOAs or at another carrier, the number of permitted 76-seat aircraft in Section 1 B. 5 47. e. will be reduced by 35.
#102
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 1,104
Likes: 6
From: 737 A
I have a feeling this will wind up in front of an arbitrator.
There seem to be 2 sections of the LOA that reference either Compass divesting or the flow provisions being unavailable.
I would argue that the most applicable to our situation is Compass divesting, because that is a very specific situation. The reference to flow provisions being unavailable is very broad and would be applied in situations other than Compass divesting.
There seem to be 2 sections of the LOA that reference either Compass divesting or the flow provisions being unavailable.
I would argue that the most applicable to our situation is Compass divesting, because that is a very specific situation. The reference to flow provisions being unavailable is very broad and would be applied in situations other than Compass divesting.
#103
On Reserve
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Didn’t they add the section on Compass going away to specify the hiring and flow provisions which would satisfy allowing the extra 35 aircraft? There is nothing which states the hiring or flow provisions must be made available without DALPA’s approval of another LOA with the new carrier.
#104
:-)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 0
There has to be an LOA covering any new flow agreement; Both for DALPA and EDVALPA.
The company has already sent its proposal to the EDV MEC. I don't know the details, but I assume the majority of the movement will still be DGI, with a few flows. 80% DGI / 20% flow is my WAG.
The company has already sent its proposal to the EDV MEC. I don't know the details, but I assume the majority of the movement will still be DGI, with a few flows. 80% DGI / 20% flow is my WAG.
#105
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,480
Likes: 1,054
There has to be an LOA covering any new flow agreement; Both for DALPA and EDVALPA.
The company has already sent its proposal to the EDV MEC. I don't know the details, but I assume the majority of the movement will still be DGI, with a few flows. 80% DGI / 20% flow is my WAG.
The company has already sent its proposal to the EDV MEC. I don't know the details, but I assume the majority of the movement will still be DGI, with a few flows. 80% DGI / 20% flow is my WAG.
#106
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 1,104
Likes: 6
From: 737 A
Exception two: In the event the hiring or flow provisions of NWA LOA 2006-10 or LOA #9 cease to be available, either at the feeder carrier affiliate referenced in such LOAs or at another carrier, the number of permitted 76-seat aircraft in Section 1 B. 5 47. e. will be reduced by 35.
The company seems to view the “at another carrier” language as permission to substitute an Endeavor flow agreement. I think that because we have been without a flow agreement we have moved past this language and the company can’t retroactively add Endeavor. I think this language would have come into play if we had a flow “at another carrier” prior to the Compass being terminated, and would have allowed the RJs to stay in the DCI system.
In my opinion once the company had to park the 35 RJs, other language for modifying or canceling the LOA became the “effective” section.
If I haven’t said it enough, just my opinion I’m not a lawyer.
#108
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 4,101
Likes: 465
#109
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 92
Of course they can add as many RJs as they'd like to mainline without our approval.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



