35 Large RJs coming back?
05-26-2021 | 11:31 AM
#751
Banned
Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 1,164
Likes: 2
Condescending much? No, I would prefer the other deal our union has been working for contract concessions. As has been said dozens of times here...these are the cards we were dealt. Saying no would be suicide for our negotiating relations - is that what you are suggesting? Because that would be ridiculous.
05-26-2021 | 11:35 AM
#752
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 449
Likes: 3
Not at all. I don’t think a single 9E pilot thinks that way. We just know the fight isn’t ours. Everyone I have spoken to here agrees, we would love to not have this tied to scope.
05-26-2021 | 11:37 AM
#753
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
I agree with you, saying no could be bad news, don’t bite the spoon that feeds you. That being said, I’ll be condescending when I spot any poster trying to manipulate a pilot group by placing doubt in their minds. The fact it’s in your own self interest to do so is narcissistic behavior.
05-26-2021 | 11:38 AM
#755
On Reserve
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 89
Likes: 1
Amazing how desperate some of you are for flow, JFC.
So let me guess, you want DALPA to give in to scope relief and negotiate something in return, which then allows for 35 RJ’s to fly? Which of course would allow you to flow.
You most certainly are for give in scope as long as it generates contractual progression for you.
It’s not very difficult to read through the incentives of a 9E poster on a DL thread.
So let me guess, you want DALPA to give in to scope relief and negotiate something in return, which then allows for 35 RJ’s to fly? Which of course would allow you to flow.
You most certainly are for give in scope as long as it generates contractual progression for you.
It’s not very difficult to read through the incentives of a 9E poster on a DL thread.
No, no. DALPA already caved on scope eleven years ago when LOA 9 was signed. Now you want 9e to stuff that genie back in the bottle.
If Delta pilots want this scope clawed back -that they gave away in the first place- it’s going to take more than a whiney little grievance. Delta pilots need to come up with a plan, with an actual solution that has Delta pilots flying Delta planes.
but it’s easier to throw rocks at 9e.
05-26-2021 | 11:45 AM
#756
Banned
Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 1,164
Likes: 2
No, no. DALPA already caved on scope eleven years ago when LOA 9 was signed. Now you want 9e to stuff that genie back in the bottle.
If Delta pilots want this scope clawed back -that they gave away in the first place- it’s going to take more than a whiney little grievance. Delta pilots need to come up with a plan, with an actual solution that has Delta pilots flying Delta planes.
but it’s easier to throw rocks at 9e.
If Delta pilots want this scope clawed back -that they gave away in the first place- it’s going to take more than a whiney little grievance. Delta pilots need to come up with a plan, with an actual solution that has Delta pilots flying Delta planes.
but it’s easier to throw rocks at 9e.
05-26-2021 | 11:50 AM
#757
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
I did a little research on contract law and I'm just stating what I found. These things among others are what the lawyers will argue. Apparently, I struck a nerve and you have no good arguments against it so you instead turn to ad hominem attacks.
05-26-2021 | 12:04 PM
#758
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 449
Likes: 3
“In the event the hiring or flow provisions of NWA LOA 2006-10 or LOA #9 cease to be available, either at the feeder carrier affiliate referenced in such LOAs or at another carrier, the number of permitted 76-seat aircraft in Section 1 B. 47. e.will be reduced by 35.”
No. No ambiguity here...
No. No ambiguity here...
05-26-2021 | 12:05 PM
#759
Banned
Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 1,164
Likes: 2
I'm not manipulating anything...if you think it's a slam-dunk case why all the fuss?
I did a little research on contract law and I'm just stating what I found. These things among others are what the lawyers will argue. Apparently, I struck a nerve and you have no good arguments against it so you instead turn to ad hominem attacks.
I did a little research on contract law and I'm just stating what I found. These things among others are what the lawyers will argue. Apparently, I struck a nerve and you have no good arguments against it so you instead turn to ad hominem attacks.
https://psychcentral.com/blog/psychology-self/2018/07/narcissist-delusion
Good day.
05-26-2021 | 12:12 PM
#760
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
https://www.reedsmith.com/files/uplo...July_2014_.pdf
Good day to you as well.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
