New Hire Class Drops
#2681
I heard from a reliable source that they’re in the 3-4 month pool range and trying to reduce that, but training is backed up still which is the limiting factor.
#2682
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 5,519
Likes: 188
From: UNA
And the NYC 220 drought continues
#2683
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,370
Likes: 0
From: 737 FO
I count around 60 unfilled secondary vacancies for 220 fo's, as long as they didn't deny any current pilots with a bid, they could fill those. New hire positions have to be offered to bid, but that includes secondary vacancies.
#2684
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
I was talking to a new hire who's on the nyc 220 and he said he was worried about consolidating because he's flying so little on reserve. I didn't believe him until I looked at their daily trip coverage. Such a dramatic difference from the constant Gs and As on the other NBs. It reminds me of the good old days of 2018 when you could actually swap and drop trips.
#2685
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,551
Likes: 100
From: Road construction signholder
Out of curiosity how can you find the specifics of unfilled secondary vacancies? How do you determine that they are truly unfilled vs the company choosing not to backfill? I realize that the company would likely NOT "choose not to backfill" an entry level position.
#2686
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,370
Likes: 0
From: 737 FO
I count up how many pilots are leaving the position and then subtract how many are awarded it
. If any positions were listed on the AE, I then add those to my total for my number of available positions.
#2687
The unfilled's that stand out to me, per widget seniority, are ATL 330B, ATL 765B, and NYC 765B (I only really looked at NY, ATL, and DTW). I'm guessing ATL 330B was a case of the company choosing not to fill and NYC 765B was prob truly unfilled. I'm curious which camp ATL 765B falls into.
#2688
Can’t find crew pickup
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,036
Likes: 187
The unfilled's that stand out to me, per widget seniority, are ATL 330B, ATL 765B, and NYC 765B (I only really looked at NY, ATL, and DTW). I'm guessing ATL 330B was a case of the company choosing not to fill and NYC 765B was prob truly unfilled. I'm curious which camp ATL 765B falls into.
#2689
Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,361
Likes: 58
Are you sure about that? Contingent vacancies are not category vacancies. Pretty sure they would need to be rebid for a new hire to get them under 22.E.10. If you start out with 75 category vacancies for [as an example] NYC73N and 15 pilots bid out with no backfill, I suspect you have 75 vacancies immediately available for new hires and 15 that will need to be rebid as vacancies in the next AE.
#2690
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,370
Likes: 0
From: 737 FO
Are you sure about that? Contingent vacancies are not category vacancies. Pretty sure they would need to be rebid for a new hire to get them under 22.E.10. If you start out with 75 category vacancies for [as an example] NYC73N and 15 pilots bid out with no backfill, I suspect you have 75 vacancies immediately available for new hires and 15 that will need to be rebid as vacancies in the next AE.
By your logic, if the company posted an AE for 20 NYC73N, and 20 pilots bid off A220 to go there, they would have to post another AE to even have any new hire vacancies.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



