Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   DL Hiring: New Process (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/134320-dl-hiring-new-process.html)

TheDuster 11-25-2021 06:25 AM

Many thanks for the replies. All are appreciated!

Adventures 11-25-2021 05:03 PM


Originally Posted by Flymeaway (Post 3313719)
I just took the assessment after practicing with the Cut-E for a few days and thought I'd give an after action report.

Reaction speed: The actual assessment was much easier than the practice. First, the images are closer together, which helps, then if the images are correct, they stay up for 5 seconds or until you click, so you don't have to be so worried about missing them if they're close but you don't click right away. Still glad I practiced though.

Monitoring ability: Pretty close to the practice. I'm really glad I practiced since once you get more than about 8, it gets pretty hard. Or it did for me anyway. Practicing helped a lot.

Spatial orientation: Just mentally transposing a fixed card ADF onto a DG. You're on the tail of the needle. Exactly the same as the practice.

Multi-tasking: This one was a bit different than practice in several key ways. The airplane is at the bottom of the screen on the left side and 4 objects are falling towards it. You click on the airplane to move it, and this is important, when you release the mouse button, all of the objects fall very quickly and you get more objects up top. I eventually learned to hold the mouse button in while doing the math problem and duplicate identification problem in my head, then releasing the mouse. This gave me plenty of time to click the answers and get back to the plane. Second, the practice takes away the problems on the right side of the screen after so many seconds. So if you're too slow, it's just gone. The real assessment doesn't do this. I imagine the faster you do it the better, but your problem won't go away until you click an answer. Third, in the practice, the math problems are either correct, or wildly incorrect. Since there was such a time crunch, I learned to click correct if I thought the answer was within 3 or 4 and I was always correct if I was in time. In the real assessment, not only is the time less restrictive, but the math answers are all either correct, or 1 off. I missed several early because the practice taught me to click correct if it was close, and you can't do the real assessment that way.

Complex control: Significantly different as well. First, in the practice you couldn't alter your speed (or I couldn't figure out how to anyway). In the real assessment you can. It will automatically make you go faster and faster, but you can click some keys to adjust it. I did the real assessment's practice a few times to determine how fast was too fast and which objects were more difficult and required me to slow down. The objects themselves rotate much slower than many of the ones in the Cut-E did, and the objects aren't so unusual either. The real assessment was certainly easier than the practice, but I did feel the practice was helpful. I wish the assessment was more clear on how they graded this section though. It's not clear whether it's better to go slow so as to ensure you never crash, or go fast to get through as many obstacles as possible even though you risk a crash or two.

Sudoku: This was significantly different as well. In the Cut-E, you only need to fill in one row or column, and it's not like sudoku where there's only one right answer. So long as you fill in the one row or column that includes the highlighted square, and you don't duplicate anything in any rows or columns, you win. Often there are multiple solutions that work. Once I figured this out, I could get through all 15 in 3 minutes or so and I thought I had that test figured out. In the real assessment, though, it's different. There indeed is only one solution, and there's no need to fill in an entire row or column. Additionally, in the practice, there's a "next" button and you can put whatever shapes you want in whatever squares you want, including the highlighted square, and it doesn't grade it until you click next. In the real assessment, there's no next button, and as soon as you click any of the answer shapes, it immediately grades it, so there's no "let's try this and see how it works" like there is in the practice. Also, for me, I was focused on the problem and when I'd want to put, say, a triangle in one of the boxes, I'd accidentally click the answer triangle instead of the box. In the practice this was no problem, you just changed the highlighted box before you clicked next and it was fine. In the real assessment when I did that, it would instantly accept that as my answer for the highlighted square and move on, so I missed several due to that. Be careful and practice never clicking those answer squares until you're also ready to hit next.

The personality assessment: Yeah you can't practice for it really. It was certainly different though. In the Cut-E, it was a Meyers Briggs thing and I didn't think it was too rough. Introverted/Extroverted, Creative/Logical, etc. I know myself well enough to be able to answer those pretty accurately I think. In the real one, it often gives you the choice between two bad options. Things like "I have strong opinions and always make sure everyone around me knows them." (I am an overbearing jerk) and "When someone thinks positively of me, I know it won't be long before they think negatively of me." (I am a loser). If you don't think either applies to you, tough luck, you have to choose one. I hope I get the interview, obviously, but even if I don't, I wish I would get to chat with the shrink to see what the assessment said about me, because I have no idea.

Clearances: These weren't too bad. You get three times to listen, and you can write them down. The clearances are fairly lengthy with generally three parts to each one. An altitude, a heading, and a speed for example. You have to choose between three possible responses, and all three will be the same except for one item. I have been oversees before, but I'm not some amazing linguist. I may have missed one, but so long as you write them down, it was pretty easy I felt.

In summary, the practice was certainly worth the $20, but there was some negative to it as well that I wish I had known beforehand. Hopefully this helps some folks down the line do better than I did.

So, did you get it? Cheers

JetPilotDaddy 11-28-2021 10:47 AM


Originally Posted by TheDuster (Post 3326949)
For anyone who has interviewed recently, does Delta prefer that certain milestones/events be tabbed in your logbooks? The preliminary instructions I’ve received don’t mention it, but I’d like to get the ball rolling on the paperwork as early as possible.

Never got any questions on mine, but it can make their job easier when looking at it. I've been told by previous interviews that they think it looks more professional. However, I never saw them open my logbooks, and they never referenced them.

In regards to who got offers in my group. 18 went in. 7 mil, 6 121, 4 135, 1 91. 1 mil, and 2 121 regional didn't get offers.

Busdriver789 11-28-2021 12:14 PM

Interview hotels
 
Can anyone recommend a good hotel to book for the interview with shuttle service?

PRIMA 11-28-2021 12:24 PM


Originally Posted by Busdriver789 (Post 3328189)
Can anyone recommend a good hotel to book for the interview with shuttle service?


Hilton


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

runinonfumes 11-28-2021 12:58 PM

Hilton was great. Right across the street from the campus so you can walk.

JetPilotDaddy 11-28-2021 02:19 PM


Originally Posted by Busdriver789 (Post 3328189)
Can anyone recommend a good hotel to book for the interview with shuttle service?

Stayed at the Hilton. You'll see the others gathering in the morning for the 5 min walk over. They will store your luggage behind the desk. They know the drill. Most provide a shuttle over, too.

Tiki09 11-28-2021 09:05 PM

Asking recent new hires, how far out from background check complete/email invite were your class dates? I started background stuff last week. Seems like 2+ weeks is the norm for that process to go through. Trying to figure out if I’ll be starting before the holidays or if I can make plans.

StickPig 11-28-2021 11:34 PM


Originally Posted by Tiki09 (Post 3328388)
Asking recent new hires, how far out from background check complete/email invite were your class dates? I started background stuff last week. Seems like 2+ weeks is the norm for that process to go through. Trying to figure out if I’ll be starting before the holidays or if I can make plans.

I was 12 OCT Indoc. Got the background check started a day after CJO and got the indoc class date email about 3.5 weeks later. YMMV.

Drum 11-29-2021 03:07 AM


Originally Posted by BoomC (Post 3326072)
I’m seeing a lot of TBNT responses from the online assessment who sound like they’re military pilots. If you guys don’t mind sharing I’d like to hear how many people who have a full 20 years in are fairing vs people pulling chocks early.

My theory (currently based on a very small same size) is that with the training pipeline maxed out right now they are hesitant to offer a job to people they anticipate dropping mil leave as soon as they hit the line.

4/4 CJO on recent folks I've written email for, and what crewdawg said, not sure who's going to be left to turn off the lights in flying squadrons.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:43 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands