![]() |
Originally Posted by OOfff
(Post 3616423)
I love that your response to “This guy literally said that because he's a 20 year military veteran, he doesn't think he should have to take the same tests everyone has to” was to disagree that the mil person said that, then agree that they should be exempt from the testing.
|
Originally Posted by datuputi3
(Post 3616088)
Thanks man. Been practicing exactly that. Was the AAL one similar to Delta's? Congrats on the CJO!
|
Originally Posted by Puddytatt
(Post 3616118)
Maybe a little humility wouldn't hurt to start...
But also, I've got a 100% clean, spotless 20 year military record across 6 different aircraft that required military and civilian training to complete. That should be worth something. |
Originally Posted by Tropical
(Post 3616261)
Uh... you serious, Clark? Is this trolling?
Hold on just a second. This guy literally said that because he's a 20 year military veteran, he doesn't think he should have to take the same tests everyone has to. I guess Delta should just salute him and put him in class? And you're defending this? This is the ultimate stereotype of military officer douchebaggery when they try to flex on the civilian world. We really have enough of that at this airline already. Thank you for your service. Now get in line with everyone else, Colonel. The Delta AON test is probably interesting for the data nerds. |
Originally Posted by Tropical
(Post 3616283)
Yes, it was a straw man argument. One you continue to attempt to argue. If you must go there, the Endeavor pilots flowing actually do work for our parent company and have a long record flying our passengers with success. USAF dude does not. So it's an irrelevant comparison (straw man argument).
He was totally a d-bag. He straight up stated that he shouldn't have to go through the normal interview process because his long military record "speaks for itself". Sorry, not sorry, but yeah, that reflects poorly on all military officers by perpetuating the "better than you" top gun stereotype. Now you're judging me and my cockpit culture based on some semi-anonymous message board posts? Wow, you're really on a roll. Step away from the computer, Captain. Go get some fresh air. This isn't real life. I have a background in a small but highly visible passenger carrying operation and have worked with people from all walks of life as flight attendants, flight engineers, and pilots (not to mention load masters and boom operators). Not sure why you're so angry, but this is the internet so I'll allow it. |
Originally Posted by jaxsurf
(Post 3616355)
A resume that documents 20 years of military service doesn’t really mean crap. There always needs to be some sort of sh** screen so that the organization is able to keep the most obvious weirdos/douchebags out.
100% agree about the in-person interview being a "weird dude" screen. Delta can do what they want. They certainly need some sort of screen because they can't be expected to look at all 10,000 apps or whatever. |
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 3616396)
I didn't look at what he said like that.
In his defense, he made a lot of sense. He didn't say his military creds should entitle him to the class of his choice. Just that 20 years flying in the mil should suffice for the silly balance the ball on the see-saw while counting backwards tests. The one thing about mil pilots that I think everyone can agree on is that as a group they bring at least a guaranteed average acceptable (or better) standard that is widely recognized by pretty much everyone in the industry. The fact that someone could successfully navigate a 20 year military flying career but not get a job offer because of some high theory "cog test" implied derivatives is kind of silly when you think about it. He also didn't say he shouldn't have to interview. I've done everything else the rest of you have done to prep for the day to include paying thousands of $$$ for consultants and prep. Though I wish I had paid for Cut-e practice before the Delta AON test. Didn't realize it was a "thanks but don't call us we'll call you" kind of thing with them. Lesson learned. Feedback I've received from friends at Delta is usually along the lines of "Delta misses out on a lot of good pilots with that test." Maybe they're just being nice to my face. |
Congrats, CAFB, on getting several other flying job offers. The transition from mil to airlines can be stressful and yours sounded a little moreso than normal. I’m sorry about the past PARB results but am glad for you that other options opened up. FWIW I think you should reapply to dal in a few months if u still want to try to get on here.
|
Originally Posted by tripled
(Post 3616631)
Congrats, CAFB, on getting several other flying job offers. The transition from mil to airlines can be stressful and yours sounded a little moreso than normal. I’m sorry about the past PARB results but am glad for you that other options opened up. FWIW I think you should reapply to dal in a few months if u still want to try to get on here.
|
Originally Posted by CAFB 04-12
(Post 3616584)
I'm not asking to go to the front of the line. I'm asking Delta to not screen any pilots (including you, whatever your background is) using a 5x5 symbol sudoku and a nearly impossible dot counting exercise. Gather data and crunch it....fine. Not sure why this is controversial.
At least with the AON, I can see why it's vaguely relevant, if not antiquated for a time when they had way too many qualified candidates to filter out. But after reading this thread for awhile and seeing people had failed it even in today's hiring market, I tabbed all the advice, put some prep work in, and passed just fine. Maybe that little bit of extra focused effort (which you're already on top of) is what puts some scores slightly ahead, impossible dot counting aside. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:08 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands