Trip quality? Ouch
#41
Line Holder
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 654
Likes: 6
If that’s what you want, great. Or you can now pickup another easy 2-day to get back to where you were pay wise.
#42
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,836
Likes: 175
From: window seat
What would be nice is a bidding function where one could add parameters such as "award trips that report at late as possible/release as early as possible" (in conjunction with integrating it with other biddable parameters) instead of trying to pick arbitrary times that PBS is incapabile of contextualizing. "Award trips after 12 Noon" for example means 12:01PM is identical in every way to 5PM, etc.
As for what DALPA or the company use to define it, I suspect its somewhat arbitrary but possibly based on average assumed commuter flight/frequency to make the 2 flight cutoff parameters. BOS-LGA commuters would have a radically different definition of commutable trip than a low frequency 2 legger a little further away.
#43
Now if only we could get PBS and iCrew to show... say... a 3day as a 3day. Every trip with a check-out after midnight (block-in at 2331) shows up as a 4day. It also throws off the "credit per day" calculation, so asking for avg daily credit >6 would eliminate 18+ hour 3days checking out after midnight.
#44
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: 73NB
Now if only we could get PBS and iCrew to show... say... a 3day as a 3day. Every trip with a check-out after midnight (block-in at 2331) shows up as a 4day. It also throws off the "credit per day" calculation, so asking for avg daily credit >6 would eliminate 18+ hour 3days checking out after midnight.
Avoid Pairings If Pairing Check-Out < 02:00
That will eliminate any trip that doesn't reach the ADG trigger on the last day. Of course if you're fairly junior this line can still be ignored in Denial.
If you use Average Daily Credit in your Awards after this Avoid (presuming it is honored), the calculations won't be messed up.
#45
Roll’n Thunder
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,179
Likes: 592
From: Pilot
What would be nice is a bidding function where one could add parameters such as "award trips that report at late as possible/release as early as possible" (in conjunction with integrating it with other biddable parameters) instead of trying to pick arbitrary times that PBS is incapabile of contextualizing. "Award trips after 12 Noon" for example means 12:01PM is identical in every way to 5PM, etc.
#46
One way to eliminate those trips is to use the following line in your bid:
Avoid Pairings If Pairing Check-Out < 02:00
That will eliminate any trip that doesn't reach the ADG trigger on the last day. Of course if you're fairly junior this line can still be ignored in Denial.
If you use Average Daily Credit in your Awards after this Avoid (presuming it is honored), the calculations won't be messed up.
Avoid Pairings If Pairing Check-Out < 02:00
That will eliminate any trip that doesn't reach the ADG trigger on the last day. Of course if you're fairly junior this line can still be ignored in Denial.
If you use Average Daily Credit in your Awards after this Avoid (presuming it is honored), the calculations won't be messed up.
The way I do it now is manually search for trips with Avg Daily Credit LESS than 5:15 and pick out the ones I want before the generic ADC request.
#47
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: 73NB
Yes, it can definitely be a drawback for trips like that. It depends on your fleet. Many fleets don't have those types of trips and the 4-day that pays 15:45 bites a fair number of pilots. That Avoid is just one potential technique to simplify bidding in certain instances. If you're a commuter on a narrow body fleet and you're using trip length for Awards (as many do) then the 00:01 check-out is a nasty surprise...
#48
Roll’n Thunder
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,179
Likes: 592
From: Pilot
Yes, it can definitely be a drawback for trips like that. It depends on your fleet. Many fleets don't have those types of trips and the 4-day that pays 15:45 bites a fair number of pilots. That Avoid is just one potential technique to simplify bidding in certain instances. If you're a commuter on a narrow body fleet and you're using trip length for Awards (as many do) then the 00:01 check-out is a nasty surprise...
Lol I did something similar to that literally the first month I ever held a line here. Bid for trips that released before like 1700. Turns out 0001 is before 1700. Saw that on my award and was like “oooohhhhhhhhh, crap!” Lesson learned!
#49
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,836
Likes: 175
From: window seat
Right, but it takes numerous lines of blocky, semi arbitrary cutoffs. What you suggested is one of the better strategies we have available. But in your instance, it views a 16:29 release the same as a 16:00 release etc. In order to pref trips based off just the parameter of release time would require hundreds of lines of bidding versus one line of "award trips with release as early as possible" or something like that.
#50
Right, but it takes numerous lines of blocky, semi arbitrary cutoffs. What you suggested is one of the better strategies we have available. But in your instance, it views a 16:29 release the same as a 16:00 release etc. In order to pref trips based off just the parameter of release time would require hundreds of lines of bidding versus one line of "award trips with release as early as possible" or something like that.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



