![]() |
Anyone else think it's ridiculous that the ace app is backed up to 25 days last time I heard? There was a time when I would get a response from the scheduling committee on the same day. This was all pre-covid and before the union purge. 25 days. 3 1/2 weeks. Absurd.
|
Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
(Post 3354103)
Anyone else think it's ridiculous that the ace app is backed up to 25 days last time I heard? There was a time when I would get a response from the scheduling committee on the same day. This was all pre-covid and before the union purge. 25 days. 3 1/2 weeks. Absurd.
|
Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
(Post 3354103)
Anyone else think it's ridiculous that the ace app is backed up to 25 days last time I heard? There was a time when I would get a response from the scheduling committee on the same day. This was all pre-covid and before the union purge. 25 days. 3 1/2 weeks. Absurd.
I think all the shenanigans over the last month or so have really put them behind. |
Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
(Post 3354103)
Anyone else think it's ridiculous that the ace app is backed up to 25 days last time I heard? There was a time when I would get a response from the scheduling committee on the same day. This was all pre-covid and before the union purge. 25 days. 3 1/2 weeks. Absurd.
|
You are welcome to join us working them
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
(Post 3354103)
Anyone else think it's ridiculous that the ace app is backed up to 25 days last time I heard? There was a time when I would get a response from the scheduling committee on the same day. This was all pre-covid and before the union purge. 25 days. 3 1/2 weeks. Absurd.
Example - I had an ARCOS call in the middle of the night - I noticed (in my groggy state) that the batch size was too big. I screenshotted it and went back to sleep. Next afternoon, I called scheduling - after ten minutes on the phone while they researched it, I had 2 hours of pay on my schedule. Problem solved. And like others said, WE are ALPA - if you don't like how ALPA is doing something, reach out to your reps, and join a committee. There seems to be plenty of work to go around. |
Originally Posted by tunes
(Post 3354273)
You are welcome to join us working them
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by tunes
(Post 3354273)
You are welcome to join us working them
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk I think I'm like 800 or something in the que. Whatever. I know you guys will work it out. As 2 others have indicated a combination of fast and loose sched covergage by the Kompnay and us having the ACE app to report these more efficiently |
Originally Posted by iaflyer
(Post 3354281)
I think it's ridiculous that you're complaining about the ALPA volunteers that are processing the ACE reports. I flew with one the other day - he is dedicated, works hard and said two things. First, the reroutes, 23K and inexperienced schedulers are causing the number of reports to shoot up, and 2, a decent number of the issues could be resolved with a phone call to scheduling by the pilot. (he understands they take forever to answer the phone now) but often they can rectify the issue then and there.
Example - I had an ARCOS call in the middle of the night - I noticed (in my groggy state) that the batch size was too big. I screenshotted it and went back to sleep. Next afternoon, I called scheduling - after ten minutes on the phone while they researched it, I had 2 hours of pay on my schedule. Problem solved. And like others said, WE are ALPA - if you don't like how ALPA is doing something, reach out to your reps, and join a committee. There seems to be plenty of work to go around. |
Got it. So you guys think 25 days is acceptable. I pay almost $5000 per year in non-tax deductible dues. To me 25 days isn't acceptable. I appreciate the work of the volunteers. Maybe we need to pay people to get more people working on this.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:09 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands