Search
Notices

18/5/5/5

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-20-2022, 01:53 PM
  #251  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,886
Default

Originally Posted by JamesBond View Post
Again, I am not negotiating Jack Squat, I am exercising my rights of free speech guaranteed under the Constitution. If the union wants to squash my opinions in public I have a foolproof way of doing it.... GET US A ****ING CONTRACT. Until then, they can **** and mind their own business.
‘muh riyts!!
Gspeed is offline  
Old 11-20-2022, 02:13 PM
  #252  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FangsF15's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,172
Default

Originally Posted by OOfff View Post
and yet, nobody ever tells the “rawr I’ll only take 30% back to 2019 and a $300k min balance plus up and my birthday off and nothing else” people to pipe down, only those who have more moderate views. Strange.
That’s because the former is trying to rise the bar higher, while the latter is undermining the NC (and the rest of us) by lowering it.

But you knew that.
FangsF15 is offline  
Old 11-20-2022, 02:40 PM
  #253  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,921
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44 View Post
I know my minimum was 20 percent higher than current rates at beginning of 2022. Give that inflation in 9 percent, I now have a minimum of 30 percent higher than current rates in 2023. I feel these are on the low side. Anything less and I’m automatic no vote. I am willing to strike.
I am also expecting a $60,000 retro check. 18/5/5/5 starting in 2022 is a slap in the face. It’s time to pay up.
hockeypilot44 is online now  
Old 11-20-2022, 02:44 PM
  #254  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: LAX 350 A
Posts: 564
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44 View Post
I am also expecting a $60,000 retro check. 18/5/5/5 starting in 2022 is a slap in the face. It’s time to pay up.
Unless you're a NB FO working the minimum schedule, I think $60K is quite a bit low.
bigdaddie is offline  
Old 11-20-2022, 04:12 PM
  #255  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,544
Default

Originally Posted by OOfff View Post
who is arguing against contractual improvements?
Anyone attempting to make the case that our ask is too high. When someone doesn’t have the specifics yet claims it was too high, they are arguing against the union’s efforts to improve the contract.
Iceberg is offline  
Old 11-20-2022, 04:32 PM
  #256  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,716
Default

Originally Posted by Iceberg View Post
Anyone attempting to make the case that our ask is too high. When someone doesn’t have the specifics yet claims it was too high, they are arguing against the union’s efforts to improve the contract.
what’s our ask? Sailing is the only person who has ever talked about our ask.
OOfff is offline  
Old 11-20-2022, 05:19 PM
  #257  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,544
Default

Originally Posted by OOfff View Post
what’s our ask? Sailing is the only person who has ever talked about our ask.
No one outside of the negotiations actually knows the specific ask, you’re aware of that. There have been other posters who said the request was too high and blamed that for not signing something January 2020.
Iceberg is offline  
Old 11-20-2022, 05:36 PM
  #258  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,909
Default

Originally Posted by OOfff View Post
what’s our ask? Sailing is the only person who has ever talked about our ask.
Not true. Sailing talks about DALPA’s demands.

As far as I can tell, their opener was in fact just a list of priorities developed from the input of the membership. Regular polling has continually updated the NC through the MEC of our evolving priorities. That’s in strong contrast to the UAL MEC, who didn’t poll, agreed to a TA that met almost no one’s needs, and had it rejected by 94% of voters.
TED74 is offline  
Old 11-20-2022, 05:49 PM
  #259  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ebl14's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: 73N
Posts: 859
Default

Originally Posted by OOfff View Post
and yet, nobody ever tells the “rawr I’ll only take 30% back to 2019 and a $300k min balance plus up and my birthday off and nothing else” people to pipe down, only those who have more moderate views. Strange.
Maybe think about this a little harder to understand how your view of what is “realistic” may be hindering our efforts at the negotiating table. If you really do believe your opinion of what is attainable at the table is accurate and is well below your co workers’ estimations, maybe just keep it to yourself on social platforms. Who knows, maybe the realist or even the optimist projection will prevail, win for all.
ebl14 is offline  
Old 11-20-2022, 06:22 PM
  #260  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 837
Default

Originally Posted by ebl14 View Post
Maybe think about this a little harder to understand how your view of what is “realistic” may be hindering our efforts at the negotiating table. If you really do believe your opinion of what is attainable at the table is accurate and is well below your co workers’ estimations, maybe just keep it to yourself on social platforms. Who knows, maybe the realist or even the optimist projection will prevail, win for all.
Come on.......How do you know it is below his co workers estimations? Do you have access to polling data? Maybe it's people whose view of what is attainable is way above their coworkers estimations are hindering negotiations and a future deal.
MJP27 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices