Biden backs rail bosses
#141
Can't abide NAI
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
IMHO labor leaders need to run Dr. Martin Luther King’s detailed play book.
If we do not stand up and challenge the RLA, it ain’t changing.
#143
On Reserve
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 72
Likes: 4
From: Delta Pilot
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2022/11/rail-strike-why-the-railroads-wont-give-in-on-paid-leave-psr-precision-scheduled-railroading.html
I rarely post on the weighty stuff as I often feel out of my depth having come to the 121 world as a second career in my late 40’s and as admittedly not as up to speed on labor-management relations as I should be. That being said, I am fairly well versed on process improvement. Lots of Lean Six Sigma work in mil aviation later applied with success in the energy industry.
I’m struck by the parallels between the railroads and us, particularly by the discussion in this article on P.S.R. or “Precision Scheduled Railroading” which really reads a lot like our “Optimizer”. I’m also struck by the authors posit on its theoretical benefit vs it’s real world failures when encountering disruption (insert IROP). These efficiency initiatives are at their core based on Goldratt’s “Theory Of Constraints”, Toyota’s “Lean Manufacturing” and “Just In Time Manufacturing”. They can be very effective in stable manufacturing/production centric systems but in our very dynamic system, not quite. And they most certainly do not benefit either the laborer or for that matter the end consumer. The shareholder and executive class, a resounding yes.
I rarely post on the weighty stuff as I often feel out of my depth having come to the 121 world as a second career in my late 40’s and as admittedly not as up to speed on labor-management relations as I should be. That being said, I am fairly well versed on process improvement. Lots of Lean Six Sigma work in mil aviation later applied with success in the energy industry.
I’m struck by the parallels between the railroads and us, particularly by the discussion in this article on P.S.R. or “Precision Scheduled Railroading” which really reads a lot like our “Optimizer”. I’m also struck by the authors posit on its theoretical benefit vs it’s real world failures when encountering disruption (insert IROP). These efficiency initiatives are at their core based on Goldratt’s “Theory Of Constraints”, Toyota’s “Lean Manufacturing” and “Just In Time Manufacturing”. They can be very effective in stable manufacturing/production centric systems but in our very dynamic system, not quite. And they most certainly do not benefit either the laborer or for that matter the end consumer. The shareholder and executive class, a resounding yes.
#144
On Reserve
Joined: Mar 2022
Posts: 198
Likes: 8
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2022/11/rail-strike-why-the-railroads-wont-give-in-on-paid-leave-psr-precision-scheduled-railroading.html
I rarely post on the weighty stuff as I often feel out of my depth having come to the 121 world as a second career in my late 40’s and as admittedly not as up to speed on labor-management relations as I should be. That being said, I am fairly well versed on process improvement. Lots of Lean Six Sigma work in mil aviation later applied with success in the energy industry.
I’m struck by the parallels between the railroads and us, particularly by the discussion in this article on P.S.R. or “Precision Scheduled Railroading” which really reads a lot like our “Optimizer”. I’m also struck by the authors posit on its theoretical benefit vs it’s real world failures when encountering disruption (insert IROP). These efficiency initiatives are at their core based on Goldratt’s “Theory Of Constraints”, Toyota’s “Lean Manufacturing” and “Just In Time Manufacturing”. They can be very effective in stable manufacturing/production centric systems but in our very dynamic system, not quite. And they most certainly do not benefit either the laborer or for that matter the end consumer. The shareholder and executive class, a resounding yes.
I rarely post on the weighty stuff as I often feel out of my depth having come to the 121 world as a second career in my late 40’s and as admittedly not as up to speed on labor-management relations as I should be. That being said, I am fairly well versed on process improvement. Lots of Lean Six Sigma work in mil aviation later applied with success in the energy industry.
I’m struck by the parallels between the railroads and us, particularly by the discussion in this article on P.S.R. or “Precision Scheduled Railroading” which really reads a lot like our “Optimizer”. I’m also struck by the authors posit on its theoretical benefit vs it’s real world failures when encountering disruption (insert IROP). These efficiency initiatives are at their core based on Goldratt’s “Theory Of Constraints”, Toyota’s “Lean Manufacturing” and “Just In Time Manufacturing”. They can be very effective in stable manufacturing/production centric systems but in our very dynamic system, not quite. And they most certainly do not benefit either the laborer or for that matter the end consumer. The shareholder and executive class, a resounding yes.
#145
We already have and had a more effective escalator but we chose to water it down to virtually be ineffective. Now is the time. The RLA is a century old and has just proven its worth to both parties. Legislative reform is the futile approach. Especially with a divided congress. Our resolve as individual bargaining entities will determine if we are to repeat the cycle endlessly. Our current environment is as good as it gets.
#146
You need to press that issue on your next contact cause it ain't happening in this one.
#147
We all get one vote and it was part of our opener. Anyone with contracts ahead of them in their career and TVM perspective knows this is a must. Not to mention or retro rabbit hole.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



