Search
Notices

Ace update?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-13-2024, 02:43 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,067
Default

Originally Posted by LeineLodge View Post
Did the app actually provide the value you received? Or was it the knowledgeable scheduling volunteer that was on the receiving end of the ticket?

Considering the thread thrashing over one-time vehicle purchases, it’s not a small amount of cash being spent on a recurring subscription basis.

Simply sharing what I came across last fall. I had every intention to submit a resolution to study the value of this…but I got lazy and didn’t.

Maybe someone else cares enough to shine some sunlight on it.
I think determining its value is important. I also know that before ace, there wasn't a streamlined process and emails often got lost and issues went unsolved for a long time. I don't know if it's worth it to wait until the api is turned on but I want whatever solution we have to be ready at DOS
CBreezy is offline  
Old 03-13-2024, 02:49 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2022
Posts: 325
Default

Sounds like ALPA election season is coming up, and some of the reps want to be seen as good stewards of everyone's money. Got to balance out those pay raises they gave themselves and cars they bought. They still pay for alcohol at all their meetings, or just the PUB events?
Puddytatt is offline  
Old 03-13-2024, 02:53 PM
  #13  
Bent over by buybacks
 
StoneQOLdCrazy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2017
Posts: 519
Default

Originally Posted by FangsF15 View Post
ACE recovers $20 million a year for the pilot group.
How much would the DALPA scheduling folks have recovered without ACE?
Could a less expensive option recover the same amount more efficiently?


I don't know what's going on or where it leads. But it's faulty logic to assert that recovering money is soley due to ACE and we'd recover nothing without it.
StoneQOLdCrazy is offline  
Old 03-13-2024, 03:01 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2022
Posts: 653
Default

Originally Posted by FangsF15 View Post
ACE recovers $20 million a year for the pilot group.
A number that was significantly reduced by the batch size giveaway.
ancman is offline  
Old 03-13-2024, 03:25 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FangsF15's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,195
Default

Originally Posted by StoneQOLdCrazy View Post
How much would the DALPA scheduling folks have recovered without ACE?
Could a less expensive option recover the same amount more efficiently?


I don't know what's going on or where it leads. But it's faulty logic to assert that recovering money is soley due to ACE and we'd recover nothing without it.
Talk to SK, the (recent) scheduling committee chair. Or KS, the chair before him. The process was minuscule compared to where they have built it now.

ACE doesn’t quite pay for itself, but its value is massive. I’ve made well over $10k from it. Probably closer to $20k. There are a lot of capabilities which are to be fully realized in the relatively near term. Years of prep work are about to be flushed if the MEC chair has his way.

Originally Posted by ancman View Post
A number that was significantly reduced by the batch size giveaway.
Not in the big picture. The vast, vast majority of ACE dollars weren’t RCOS violations.
FangsF15 is offline  
Old 03-13-2024, 03:39 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2022
Posts: 653
Default

Originally Posted by FangsF15 View Post
Not in the big picture. The vast, vast majority of ACE dollars weren’t RCOS violations.
The 2:00 RCOS credits were a tiny fraction of the money given away. The inability of the company to staff trips in a timely fashion under the PWA batch sizes, forcing them to resort to 23.M.7, was where the real money came from.

With direct API access on the way, near 100% enforcement would have made that extremely costly to the company. DALPA failed to extract that for a quid of equal value.
ancman is offline  
Old 03-13-2024, 03:40 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: DAL FO
Posts: 2,143
Default

Originally Posted by FangsF15 View Post
Talk to SK, the (recent) scheduling committee chair. Or KS, the chair before him. The process was minuscule compared to where they have built it now.

ACE doesn’t quite pay for itself, but its value is massive. I’ve made well over $10k from it. Probably closer to $20k. There are a lot of capabilities which are to be fully realized in the relatively near term. Years of prep work are about to be flushed if the MEC chair has his way.



Not in the big picture. The vast, vast majority of ACE dollars weren’t RCOS violations.
You haven’t made any money from ACE. It’s a ticketing queue system that we pay almost $1.5M/year for.

Thank the DALPA scheduling experts answering the tickets. Not the app that is overcharging us for functionality a GA Tech intern could write over a long weekend.
LeineLodge is offline  
Old 03-13-2024, 03:52 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FangsF15's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,195
Default

Originally Posted by LeineLodge View Post
You haven’t made any money from ACE. It’s a ticketing queue system that we pay almost $1.5M/year for.

Thank the DALPA scheduling experts answering the tickets. Not the app that is overcharging us for functionality a GA Tech intern could write over a long weekend.
I'll let SK himself speak to this, quoted from BookFace this evening to someone making a similar claim.

ACE has been and continues to be fully automated, able to ID every violation in which it’s programmed. API data automates the *information* from DBMS to ACE, as currently it’s manually loaded into ACE in large batch files every 28 days. Real-time information has only been a ‘thing’ since ratifying C19, which will eventually come to fruition once API access is complete.
Your comments above are inaccurate and I encourage you to reach out to the people who built and programmed ACE over the past several years if you have questions or seek clarification regarding its abilities.
FangsF15 is offline  
Old 03-13-2024, 04:13 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: DAL FO
Posts: 2,143
Default

Originally Posted by FangsF15 View Post
I'll let SK himself speak to this, quoted from BookFace this evening to someone making a similar claim.
How many violations are programmed? Who did/does the programming? Can it find violations that weren’t submitted as reports? If it is actually automated on batched data then why is the queue ever > 28 days max?

Prior to Flight Ops recently stepping up with Crew Assist functionality the queue was many months, sometimes approaching a year - no way was there automation grinding through the myriad reports. I’m not calling SK into question here (he’s done a LOT of good for the pilot group) but something isn’t jiving.

I would be genuinely interested in following up and seeing how this is working.

PM if you don’t want to splash specifics/names here.
LeineLodge is offline  
Old 03-13-2024, 04:22 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,117
Default

Originally Posted by FangsF15 View Post
ACE recovers $20 million a year for the pilot group.
Serious question....what about ACE up to this point drives it to recover $20M/year? Does it currently have a feature whereby it audits rotations by applying PWA rules and flags violations or is it merely a method to queue up pilot-reported inquiries of potential violations? If the latter, seems like a pretty expensive substitute to email.
FL370esq is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
koka
Part 135
20
10-26-2017 01:47 PM
EWRflyr
United
9
01-28-2012 11:34 AM
jetguy
Hangar Talk
3
09-23-2010 10:56 AM
CA Jimenez
United
8
09-06-2010 05:42 AM
chrtrplt
Cargo
16
09-24-2006 12:17 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices