Search

Notices

Contract 2026

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-17-2025 | 12:33 PM
  #401  
FangsF15's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,233
Likes: 1,199
Default

Originally Posted by CX500T
If I'm going to work extra in a VAC month it's for sure not going to be at straight pay.
Vacation counts towards the GS trigger
Reply
Old 10-17-2025 | 12:34 PM
  #402  
CX500T's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
Veteran: Navy
5 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 3,472
Likes: 640
From: NYC 7ERA
Default

Yes, but the other post mentioned it not being credit so people picking up to limit or a full month. Which I'm assuming is WS/PSB at straight pay.
Reply
Old 10-17-2025 | 12:36 PM
  #403  
FangsF15's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,233
Likes: 1,199
Default

Originally Posted by CX500T
Yes, but the other post mentioned it not being credit so people picking up to limit or a full month. Which I'm assuming is WS/PSB at straight pay.
Sorry, trying to understand the issue then. IMO, the only reason to bid a line in a vacation month is if you PLAN of picking up extra off the Swap Board or WS...
Reply
Old 10-17-2025 | 12:40 PM
  #404  
FangsF15's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,233
Likes: 1,199
Default

Originally Posted by Gone Flying
I’m incredibly wary of changes to our pay that incentivizes the company to work us more/ make our trips worse. A 6 MDG would absolutely destroy our trips.
+ 1 to this. I do NOT want to add to ADG. The company would probably love it - it wouldn't do a thing to international trip pay, and they can really load up the block on domestic trips, getting even more 'work' out of each of us over time.

Every action has an equal and opposite reaction when it comes to trip construction. The vast majority probably would hate the result of a 6:00 ADG. Yes, there might be a few examples on the margins where it would be great, but on balance it would be a disaster for QOL, IMO.
Reply
Old 10-17-2025 | 12:42 PM
  #405  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 4,110
Likes: 485
Default

Originally Posted by FangsF15
+ 1 to this. I do NOT want to add to ADG. The company would probably love it - it wouldn't do a thing to international trip pay, and they can really load up the block on domestic trips, getting even more 'work' out of each of us over time.
The company would not "love" it. They would rather we lower ADG. Then they can build 16 hour 4 day trips that suit them when they need to.

I would much rather fly a 24 hour 4 day trip than a 21 hour 4 day.

They can try to optimize it as much as they can to get it to 24hrs of block, but with EDP/SIT etc, I think those trops would end up paying much more that 6 hours per day.

Nothing is stopping the company from "really loading up on the block" now if they want to.
Reply
Old 10-17-2025 | 12:43 PM
  #406  
crewdawg's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,438
Likes: 438
Default

Originally Posted by CX500T
If I'm going to work extra in a VAC month it's for sure not going to be at straight pay.
I'm with ya, but I've flown with more than a few who count on hitting the WS PU limit in vacation months.


Originally Posted by FangsF15
Sorry, trying to understand the issue then. IMO, the only reason to bid a line in a vacation month is if you PLAN of picking up extra off the Swap Board or WS...

He's just asking why it doesn't count toward the WS PU limit as well.

Another great reason to bid a line during vacation months is to have minimal commitment during the month. If you're looking to actually take a long of a vacation, this is a great way of doing it.


Originally Posted by m3113n1a1
The company would not "love" it. They would rather we lower ADG. Then they can build 16 hour 4 day trips that suit them when they need to.

I would much rather fly a 24 hour 4 day trip than a 21 hour 4 day.

They can try to optimize it as much as they can to get it to 24hrs of block, but with EDP/SIT etc, I think those trops would end up paying much more that 6 hours per day.

I'd want to see what Carmen kicks out before we agreed to a drastic daily increase.
Reply
Old 10-17-2025 | 12:46 PM
  #407  
Roll’n Thunder
Community Influencer
15 Years
On Reserve
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 549
From: Pilot
Default

Originally Posted by Gone Flying
we have a min day, it’s 2:30.

and I still think raising rigs should be proceeded with caution.
I know we have a min day. I said I don’t want a “true” min day. The current 2:30 only really comes into play if you are on a hard time trip. I consider a true min day to be a large number, like 5-6 hours. The 2:30 was implemented to discourage the company from jamming tons of block on flying days on trips that had a 30 hour layover. With an actual min day of 5-6 hours you can kiss 30 hour layovers and one-and-done first/last days goodbye. Lots of midday DHs instead and no easy starts or finishes.
Reply
Old 10-17-2025 | 12:47 PM
  #408  
FangsF15's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,233
Likes: 1,199
Default

Originally Posted by m3113n1a1
The company would not "love" it. They would rather we lower ADG. Then they can build 16 hour 4 day trips that suit them when they need to.

I would much rather fly a 24 hour 4 day trip than a 21 hour 4 day.

They can try to optimize it as much as they can to get it to 24hrs of block, but with EDP/SIT etc, I think those trops would end up paying much more that 6 hours per day.
Well, sure I'd love to get paid 24 hours for 4-day trip too, but I like to be productive when I work - not everyone does. In fact, not many do...

My point is the company would adapt trip construction and load of that 4-day trip with 4-leg days and crap like that. Imaging doing two BHM penalty laps on the go-home day... They aren't going to simply pay more for the same bid package. Not very many people would like that bid packet in the end.

But you are certainly entitled to understand all that and still want it. Not saying this is you, I just think most people don't really think though/comprehend the second and third order effects...
Reply
Old 10-17-2025 | 12:49 PM
  #409  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 4,110
Likes: 485
Default

Originally Posted by FangsF15
Well, sure I'd love to get paid 24 hours for 4-day trip too, but I like to be productive when I work - not everyone does. In fact, not many do...

My point is the company would adapt trip construction and load of that 4-day trip with 4-leg days and crap like that. Imaging doing two BHM penalty laps on the go-home day... They aren't going to simply pay for for the same bid package. Not very many people would like that change in the end.
Then do you advocate for lowering ADG?

I think most people come to work to be productive and make money and would rather do that and have an extra day or two off per month. But I guess it needs to be polled to see if I'm completely wrong.
Reply
Old 10-17-2025 | 12:51 PM
  #410  
FangsF15's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,233
Likes: 1,199
Default

Originally Posted by m3113n1a1
Then do you advocate for lowering ADG?

I think most people come to work to be productive and make money and would rather do that and have an extra day or two off per month. But I guess it needs to be polled to see if I'm completely wrong.
FWIW, I think 5:15 is about the sweet spot. My only fear in the polling is if people have fully considered the downstream effects when weighing in. But that's always a risk in polling, I guess. They do ask that exact question on the survey, so they are clearly at least considering it, even if only to exclude it should people reject the idea.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
White Cap
Cargo
49
09-26-2019 06:11 PM
jsled
United
7
11-28-2012 11:08 PM
ea500driver
Union Talk
26
06-26-2010 09:54 AM
BoredwLife
Major
1
07-16-2008 01:27 PM
To Stay or Go
Cargo
50
04-21-2006 09:35 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices