Search

Notices

Contract 2026

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-24-2025 | 11:35 AM
  #611  
FangsF15's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,233
Likes: 1,199
Default

Originally Posted by Softheborder
Over & under on when we’ll actually sign C2026? My guess is June 2028 at the earliest.
Given your accuracy in predicting parking of airplanes and furloughs by now, I'll take the under
Reply
Old 10-24-2025 | 12:12 PM
  #612  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
Default

Originally Posted by Softheborder
Over & under on when we’ll actually sign C2026? My guess is June 2028 at the earliest.
there’s no way we sign under the current administration. we won’t have a credible threat of labor action to push things along
Reply
Old 10-24-2025 | 12:18 PM
  #613  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,578
Likes: 320
Default

Originally Posted by Softheborder
Over & under on when we’ll actually sign C2026? My guess is June 2028 at the earliest.
How long have you been here? Our union is pretty efficient when it comes to contracts. The only one dragged out so far was the covid one. We have almost always gotten retro in the past.
Reply
Old 10-24-2025 | 12:18 PM
  #614  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,580
Likes: 35
Default

Originally Posted by Gunfighter
Accepting an extension on a 3 pilot trip is a bit extension gamble. Two pilot domestic is a shorter day and pilots can better predict fatigue if asked to extend on the last leg, four pilot doubles your cruise rest opportunity. 3 pilot is a tough middle ground and nearly impossible to predict how you will feel at the end. Two pilot international or domestic redeye doesn't even enter the equation for consideration. Having been "extended" pre FAR 117 around an Iceland volcano I have no desire to ever extend.

It terms "sticking it to the man" aspect. One pilot loses a GS and quite possibly 3 pilots gain a GS. Stinks to be the one getting sent home...

The underlying issue here is the lack of contractual protections for pilots called out on GS.
Sorry I phrased that incorrectly... this all started with post #594....it was a 2 person crew, always a two person crew but had different FO's being swapped out passing thu ATL. The FO getting on the remainder of trip(second FO of the day...his first flight) was on a GS....Herkflyer opted to extend as he considered it safe to do(his prerogative). That extension resulted in the FO getting his GS as opposed to suit up pay(possibly). I image the FO was delighted Herkflyer didn't bang out fatigued as a matter of principle(which is what some are advocating).

Fatigue and sick are the same side of the coin. Use it if you need to or use it if you don't need to.... but at least acknowledge to yourself your selfishness(greed) impacts more people than you....first and foremost the customers.

I'll be the first to admit I have used the rules to my advantage....but I never lied to myself in an effort to make me "righteous" with BS "reasons".(as some are wont to do on APC and in real life on the line).
Reply
Old 10-24-2025 | 12:19 PM
  #615  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,578
Likes: 320
Default

Originally Posted by OOfff
there’s no way we sign under the current administration. we won’t have a credible threat of labor action to push things along
The last administration screwed over the railroad workers. I like the current administration.
Reply
Old 10-24-2025 | 12:20 PM
  #616  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,580
Likes: 35
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
How long have you been here? Our union is pretty efficient when it comes to contracts. The only one dragged out so far was the covid one. We have almost always gotten retro in the past.
Can't get retro on QOL and many times the retro $$$$ is not really retro but a mere payout less than what is really owed.
Reply
Old 10-24-2025 | 12:34 PM
  #617  
notEnuf's Avatar
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,248
Likes: 707
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by Buck Rogers
Nobody is disputing whether or not it is a "personal" decision. The question I am posing is, if as insinuated by the post I replied to.....if the only reason for banging out fatigued is not based on safety but instead on real/perceived injustices by the company .... is that righteous? If I would have had a green slip and showed up but it subsequently was cancelled due to "fatigue" by the other pilot, and all I got was suit up pay......and the other pilot admitted the only reason he banged out fatigued was "principle".....I would be miffed.

Call me shallow, or call it a hypothetical..........but it has happened.
You are conflating 2 different things:

1) a duty to not operate when fatigued

and

2) a choice whether to extend a duty day beyond the FAR limit by use of an exemption to do so.
Reply
Old 10-24-2025 | 12:43 PM
  #618  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 3,421
Likes: 872
Default

Originally Posted by Buck Rogers
Nobody is disputing whether or not it is a "personal" decision. The question I am posing is, if as insinuated by the post I replied to.....if the only reason for banging out fatigued is not based on safety but instead on real/perceived injustices by the company .... is that righteous? If I would have had a green slip and showed up but it subsequently was cancelled due to "fatigue" by the other pilot, and all I got was suit up pay......and the other pilot admitted the only reason he banged out fatigued was "principle".....I would be miffed.

Call me shallow, or call it a hypothetical..........but it has happened.
Think you're getting mixed up here Buck. My or any of my crew's decision to not extend is their decision. An extension is by exception, nothing more. And I, or anyone else is not required to do so. It's not to get back at "the man" - it's simply a safety call. The company can not compel us to extend. We accept it, or don't accept it at our own choosing.
Reply
Old 10-24-2025 | 01:47 PM
  #619  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,872
Likes: 189
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
How long have you been here? Our union is pretty efficient when it comes to contracts. The only one dragged out so far was the covid one. We have almost always gotten retro in the past.
The COVID one was also the only contract where we opened to essentially double Delta’s pilot costs. The only other opener like that in our history was the 777 pay negotiations. In fact if you want you can dust that opener off and use it again! The result will be the same.
Reply
Old 10-24-2025 | 02:22 PM
  #620  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 1,128
Likes: 35
Default

Originally Posted by Buck Rogers
Nobody is disputing whether or not it is a "personal" decision. The question I am posing is, if as insinuated by the post I replied to.....if the only reason for banging out fatigued is not based on safety but instead on real/perceived injustices by the company .... is that righteous? If I would have had a green slip and showed up but it subsequently was cancelled due to "fatigue" by the other pilot, and all I got was suit up pay......and the other pilot admitted the only reason he banged out fatigued was "principle".....I would be miffed.

Call me shallow, or call it a hypothetical..........but it has happened.
Why on earth would anyone care if some turd greenslipper is “miffed”? Especially when they still get paid just for showing up…

I have far more respect for people that don’t lift a finger to help the company than I do the greedy pig trough green slip guzzlers. Those people are half of what’s wrong with the company.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
White Cap
Cargo
49
09-26-2019 06:11 PM
jsled
United
7
11-28-2012 11:08 PM
ea500driver
Union Talk
26
06-26-2010 09:54 AM
BoredwLife
Major
1
07-16-2008 01:27 PM
To Stay or Go
Cargo
50
04-21-2006 09:35 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices