Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Network Rumors and facts >

Network Rumors and facts

Search

Notices

Network Rumors and facts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-15-2026 | 12:20 PM
  #341  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 5,524
Likes: 194
From: UNA
Default

Originally Posted by Gunfighter
SLC runway is 12,000 feet, JNB is 14,500. Does anyone have access to planning software that could see how the runway length offsets the density altitude?
When does SLC get a longer runway?
interesting point. Although I would assume any ultra long haul flights would be started after they lengthen the runway.
Reply
Old 03-15-2026 | 01:42 PM
  #342  
Line Holder
10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,995
Likes: 176
Default

SLC won’t get a longer runway until they move some massive electric transmission lines to the North. That would be a very big (but inevitable) project. I’ve heard 34R would be extended. Some people seem to think this could happen around the Olympics in 2034.

SYD and HND are Open Skies with the US, but also locally slot restricted. The entire state of UT is 3.5 million which means SLC would have to heavily rely on connecting traffic to feed these flights.

In 2024 and 2025 SLC saw traffic of about 28M people. Planners are saying there could be a terminal C at around 35M travelers. That might also be an impetus for a runway extension, but a terminal C would require the big hangar torn down, twy E and F probably moved, and the fuel farm and fire station moved. All huge projects.
Reply
Old 03-15-2026 | 01:50 PM
  #343  
Line Holder
Veteran: Air Force
50 Countries Visited
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,292
Likes: 37
Default

Originally Posted by Planetrain
SLC won’t get a longer runway until they move some massive electric transmission lines to the North. That would be a very big (but inevitable) project. I’ve heard 34R would be extended. Some people seem to think this could happen around the Olympics in 2034.

SYD and HND are Open Skies with the US, but also locally slot restricted. The entire state of UT is 3.5 million which means SLC would have to heavily rely on connecting traffic to feed these flights.

In 2024 and 2025 SLC saw traffic of about 28M people. Planners are saying there could be a terminal C at around 35M travelers. That might also be an impetus for a runway extension, but a terminal C would require the big hangar torn down, twy E and F probably moved, and the fuel farm and fire station moved. All huge projects.
According to CPO, they have permission now to lower the power lines to the height required to extend the runway.
Reply
Old 03-15-2026 | 02:17 PM
  #344  
Valar Morghulis's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 474
Likes: 56
Default

Originally Posted by Spudhauler
The hub came to Delta because of western. It’s likely stayed in part due to the church, but we inherited it, which you know.
Didn’t someone point out that ATL is the only “native” Delta base remaining?

LAX/SLC came from Western
SEA/MSP/DTW came from Northwest
NYC/BOS came from Northeast & PanAm

No wonder the Company isn’t into legacy paint jobs.
Reply
Old 03-15-2026 | 02:45 PM
  #345  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 87
Default

Originally Posted by Valar Morghulis
Didn’t someone point out that ATL is the only “native” Delta base remaining?

LAX/SLC came from Western
SEA/MSP/DTW came from Northwest
NYC/BOS came from Northeast & PanAm

No wonder the Company isn’t into legacy paint jobs.
our 100th birthday was aquired, not hired, right?
Reply
Old 03-15-2026 | 03:03 PM
  #346  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2023
Posts: 667
Likes: 195
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Morman
I wish more men bought flowers….
Reply
Old 03-15-2026 | 03:06 PM
  #347  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2023
Posts: 667
Likes: 195
Default

Originally Posted by Planetrain
SLC won’t get a longer runway until they move some massive electric transmission lines to the North. That would be a very big (but inevitable) project. I’ve heard 34R would be extended. Some people seem to think this could happen around the Olympics in 2034.

SYD and HND are Open Skies with the US, but also locally slot restricted. The entire state of UT is 3.5 million which means SLC would have to heavily rely on connecting traffic to feed these flights.

In 2024 and 2025 SLC saw traffic of about 28M people. Planners are saying there could be a terminal C at around 35M travelers. That might also be an impetus for a runway extension, but a terminal C would require the big hangar torn down, twy E and F probably moved, and the fuel farm and fire station moved. All huge projects.
this is all nicely spelled out in their master plan which is publicly available.
Reply
Old 03-16-2026 | 09:21 AM
  #348  
Ripinpeace's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2023
Posts: 450
Likes: 49
Default

https://x.com/ishriona/status/203353...M7wY-k2oRc_1EA

Reply
Old 03-16-2026 | 09:24 AM
  #349  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2026
Posts: 50
Likes: 8
Default

this is screaming KE 789, Not sure if DL would want to run a 359 through there, the 339 could only do it at 251T + and slightly lower density I would think.
Reply
Old 03-16-2026 | 09:25 AM
  #350  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2022
Posts: 245
Likes: 31
Default

Definitely going to be KE.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201736
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
Bestglide
United
83
04-12-2021 12:41 PM
727574drvr
Cargo
541
01-09-2020 03:40 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices