Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Network Rumors and facts >

Network Rumors and facts

Search

Notices

Network Rumors and facts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-26-2026 | 10:20 AM
  #241  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 481
Likes: 13
Default

Originally Posted by GogglesPisano
It makes one wonder why we bought 737's with SATCOM to begin with. It seemed like a god idea at the time, I suppose.
I thought it was for the Hawaii flying they did for that brief stint.
Reply
Old 02-26-2026 | 12:17 PM
  #242  
Cloudbase
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 565
Likes: 28
From: 717A
Default

I wish, just once, that we'd just order airplanes fully loaded to their max potential. No underpaying for lower weights, no skipping the extra fuel tank, no skimping on comms and theatre potential. Just buy the things plumbed for tomorrow's undetermined mission instead of yesterday's usual mission.
Old 02-26-2026 | 04:10 PM
  #243  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2021
Posts: 1,215
Likes: 306
Default

Originally Posted by GliderCFI
I wish, just once, that we'd just order airplanes fully loaded to their max potential. No underpaying for lower weights, no skipping the extra fuel tank, no skimping on comms and theatre potential. Just buy the things plumbed for tomorrow's undetermined mission instead of yesterday's usual mission.
I'd rather Delta did not go the way of Pan Am. I think a hedged strategy is more prudent vs going all-in.
Reply
Old 02-26-2026 | 04:22 PM
  #244  
Cloudbase
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 565
Likes: 28
From: 717A
Default

Originally Posted by Verdell
I'd rather Delta did not go the way of Pan Am. I think a hedged strategy is more prudent vs going all-in.
There's a big difference between buying airplanes with a slightly improved performance package over the base model, and flying empty 747's to the Caribbean and failing to have a domestic feed network because you made too many political enemies. Nowhere near comparable.
Old 02-26-2026 | 04:28 PM
  #245  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 79
Likes: 34
Default

have to save satcom aircraft for atl-mob and msp-msn
Reply
Old 02-26-2026 | 09:37 PM
  #246  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 978
Likes: 77
Default

Originally Posted by crazyjaydawg
I just think TechOps just doesn’t want to take ownership of a challenge when they don’t directly see the value firsthand. It’s the “Delta Difference” stay in your department’s silo and don’t do anything that inconveniences your division even if it supports the company at large.
Could also be the "Stay in your lane" mentality -- just do what you know and shaddup about what you think might help.

A5S
Reply
Old 02-27-2026 | 11:30 AM
  #247  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 3,390
Likes: 818
Default

Originally Posted by Trip7
Apparently the word from higher ups is moving a small subfleet of 900s just to WAT is akin to building a YYZ style deicing facility in ATL. After they got rid of the 737-700 because it was only 10 plan.

Alas, it doesn't matter anymore as the NEO has taken over the WAT flying
Yet somehow tech ops manged to do it for our ill fated 73-9 adventures to Hawaii. Also they managed to do it on the 75s with SATCOM on the routes they used to fly as well. It's not hard, it's just being lazy.

Originally Posted by crazyjaydawg
But I have to wonder why they say that. Honestly it’s a mix of laziness and incompetence.

Clearly they make it work when they have to, i.e. the A319s to BDA.

I just think TechOps just doesn’t want to take ownership of a challenge when they don’t directly see the value firsthand. It’s the “Delta Difference” stay in your department’s silo and don’t do anything that inconveniences your division even if it supports the company at large.
Love our tech ops folks, best in the biz, but yeah it's pretty much laziness at the managerial level there.

Originally Posted by 1Taco
I thought it was for the Hawaii flying they did for that brief stint.
Correcto.

Originally Posted by All 5 Stages
Could also be the "Stay in your lane" mentality -- just do what you know and shaddup about what you think might help.

A5S
Somewhat, yes. Mostly lazy managerial level stuff inside tech ops.
Reply
Old 02-27-2026 | 12:41 PM
  #248  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 5,524
Likes: 194
From: UNA
Default

Looks like 34 more 321NEOs. That puts us at 189NEO orders/deliveries + 36 options.

i wonder if these will be ETOPS w/ the second aft fuel tank.
Reply
Old 02-27-2026 | 01:23 PM
  #249  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2026
Posts: 50
Likes: 8
Default

Originally Posted by Gone Flying
Looks like 34 more 321NEOs. That puts us at 189NEO orders/deliveries + 36 options.

i wonder if these will be ETOPS w/ the second aft fuel tank.
I think they are already heavier than expected so the extra tank won't help a lot with them staying at 93.5t TOW. they could easily install 2 ACT's in the current birds too.
Reply
Old 02-27-2026 | 03:17 PM
  #250  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 5,524
Likes: 194
From: UNA
Default

Originally Posted by DeltaN900DE
I think they are already heavier than expected so the extra tank won't help a lot with them staying at 93.5t TOW. they could easily install 2 ACT's in the current birds too.
Hawaiian flies their 321NEOs all the way to SLC. AA flies theirs from PHX to the Hawaiian islands. Both of these fly standard NEOs, not LRs or XLRs, and have a MTOW of 93.5t. I’ve talked to pilots from both who are surprised we are having the issues we do, and every time it’s mentioned here, the answer always seems to come back to the 2nd ACT. But if it’s a weight issue they could get 321s all the way to 101t.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201736
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
Bestglide
United
83
04-12-2021 12:41 PM
727574drvr
Cargo
541
01-09-2020 03:40 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices