MOU 25-05

Reply Subscribe

Page 200 of 254

200

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

12-25-2025 | 02:00 PM

#1991

SideStickMonkey

Line Holder

Joined: Feb 2020

Posts: 1,148

Likes: 280

Quote:

Originally Posted by ancman

Intentional errors? Most likely not.
Errors? Absolutely.

They choose to invoke 23M7 and go to IA

They choose a route that costs them 3x to cover a trip

They signed an MOU that can cost 4x to cover a trip

So yeah, really smart to continue to give us leverage going into Section 6… Give me a break

12-25-2025 | 02:14 PM

#1992

Viper25

Line Holder

Joined: Jul 2008

Posts: 1,449

Likes: 290

Quote:

Originally Posted by SideStickMonkey

It's not that they want to give us leverage. It’s that the company knew they’d get destroyed by the system board for being so out of compliance with grievance settlements that those need grievances themselves.

12-25-2025 | 02:52 PM

#1993

notEnuf

Racketeer

Joined: Mar 2015

Posts: 13,239

Likes: 687

From: N60.4858 W149.9327

Quote:

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44

When did we get auto accept? I definitely remember having auto ack only. We had Arcos prior to auto accept.

Years ago, I had to explain how it works to a CP more than 4 years ago when I explained I would not be doing a trip. Scheduling had no clue either 4+ years ago.

12-25-2025 | 05:48 PM

#1994

ancman

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Jul 2022

Posts: 2,246

Likes: 1,092

Quote:

Originally Posted by SideStickMonkey

What point are you trying to make? I’ve never said that management intentionally gave us leverage. They accidentally gave us leverage by cramming ARCOS down our throats, agreeing to new language that included batch sizes, auto-accept, and auto-ack, and then subsequently launching an attack against batch sizes.

12-26-2025 | 08:11 AM

#1995

SideStickMonkey

Line Holder

Joined: Feb 2020

Posts: 1,148

Likes: 280

Quote:

Originally Posted by ancman

That this isn't some masterful move by the company going into Section 6 like you claim it to be

12-26-2025 | 08:37 AM

#1996

ancman

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Jul 2022

Posts: 2,246

Likes: 1,092

Quote:

Originally Posted by SideStickMonkey

That this isn't some masterful move by the company going into Section 6 like you claim it to be

That’s not what I said at all.

Management has blundered and provided us with plenty of unplanned additional leverage going into section 6. None of it is a masterful move on their part.

They will do everything they can to take that leverage back, inexpensively, especially before section 6 opens.

12-26-2025 | 09:06 AM

#1997

SideStickMonkey

Line Holder

Joined: Feb 2020

Posts: 1,148

Likes: 280

Quote:

Originally Posted by ancman

They will do everything they can to take that leverage back, inexpensively, especially before section 6 opens.

Is that your claim with the MOU?

12-26-2025 | 09:10 AM

#1998

ancman

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Jul 2022

Posts: 2,246

Likes: 1,092

Quote:

Originally Posted by SideStickMonkey

Is that your claim with the MOU?

Not at all. In fact, my claim is the exact opposite. QS strengthens our position if management actually implements it.

12-27-2025 | 11:21 AM

#1999

CX500T

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Nov 2017

Posts: 3,472

Likes: 639

From: NYC 7ERA

In todays episode of "Crew Scheduling does this to themselves"

NYC L112 today.
1640 report
Pilot calls out sick this morning

They have it soaking for SLV. Reports in just over an hour.

GS? Nope. IA calls? None yet. Wondering how they will do this one.

This was well within 18 hours with ZERO short calls on call that window. This should have started coverage the second it hit open time.

Nah, lets SS soak it.