Search

Notices

MOU 25-05

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-02-2025 | 08:00 AM
  #211  
Line Holder
25M+ Airline Miles
20 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Jul 2023
Posts: 901
Likes: 260
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
Put yourself in the schedulers shoes. They can't do their job now and we just gave them an easy button. GS = dodo bird.
What easy button? They just hit the IA button before, now it's just a QS button instead. Same downsides to them (costs), respects seniority for us, and you won't get called if you don't want it. The IA button calls you no matter what.
Reply
Old 11-02-2025 | 08:01 AM
  #212  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2024
Posts: 233
Likes: 115
Default

Originally Posted by All 5 Stages
Now you'll get ARCOS blasted at 3am when you have zero chance of being awarded the QS.

A5S
You were getting massive IA calls at 3am that were a free for all and you had zero chance of getting the trip. Now you have a choice whether you get calls or not.

Don't want a call, don't put a QS in.

Why do you think this will increase phone calls you don't want?
Reply
Old 11-02-2025 | 08:01 AM
  #213  
Roll’n Thunder
Community Influencer
15 Years
On Reserve
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,127
Likes: 549
From: Pilot
Default

Overall this is a step in the right direction. Two things are missing, either due to omission by ALPA or because the company refused to come to an agreement on these issues. First this MOU is missing is a tighter restriction on the use of QS/M7. 8 hours is way too far in advance to be skipping coverage. 2-4 hours Is much more reasonable. But that stems from the second miss - putting firm timelines in place for when trip coverage has to start once a rotation hits OT that reports within the second day manual coverage window. Yes the IA free-for-all, deal making, etc is put to bed with QS. But it still does nothing to hold scheduling accountable for sitting on trips for 12+ hours with no coverage stated before blasting it to IA (soon to be QS). If those two things were in the MOU it’d be an absolute slam dunk. Hopefully we can tweak those things in the upcoming section 6 negotiations.
Reply
Old 11-02-2025 | 08:03 AM
  #214  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2024
Posts: 233
Likes: 115
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
Put yourself in the schedulers shoes. They can't do their job now and we just gave them an easy button. GS = dodo bird.
If that's your (really far stretched) theory, then it's a win for the pilots. QS replaces GS. Now instead of just 1 pilot getting 200% pay, some random pilot gets 100% pay for doing nothing. Sounds great to me.
Reply
Old 11-02-2025 | 08:05 AM
  #215  
notEnuf's Avatar
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,246
Likes: 704
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by Khantahr
What easy button? They just hit the IA button before, now it's just a QS button instead. Same downsides to them (costs), respects seniority for us, and you won't get called if you don't want it. The IA button calls you no matter what.
They don't have to answer the phone and we required the automation prior to implementation. They can literally wait until report -2:12. The cost doesn't change, no impact to cost with a simpler process and an undefined timeline is EASIER for the scheduler and the company already has decided 3x is an acceptable cost. How do you not understand how easy we just made trip coverage without a quid?
Reply
Old 11-02-2025 | 08:08 AM
  #216  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 936
Likes: 61
From: NBC
Default

Haven’t read every post in this thread.

My take is we’ll see a massive drop in GSs. CS will leverage that we’re all “greedy bastard pilots” and keep those uncovered trips in open time longer. Meanwhile, the longer the cheese sits, pilots won’t be able to help themselves for “their” money and WS, OOBWS, or YS. Anything that’s left over will go QS at the <8 hour point, but the money saved by WS/YSing pilots will be a net cost savings for the company, even considering 3x pay. The company wouldn’t agree to anything that didn’t cut costs.

We all suspect there are already deals happening between pilots and CS. I’ve personally seen the GS progression stop and suddenly be awarded as a WS/YS.

As a commuter, this is going to mean less opportunity to pick up green, IMO. Living in base is going to get A LOT more lucrative for pilots that want to fly/make more.
Reply
Old 11-02-2025 | 08:08 AM
  #217  
notEnuf's Avatar
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,246
Likes: 704
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by Frank Grimes
If that's your (really far stretched) theory, then it's a win for the pilots. QS replaces GS. Now instead of just 1 pilot getting 200% pay, some random pilot gets 100% pay for doing nothing. Sounds great to me.
And this is different how? IAs are the same process.
Reply
Old 11-02-2025 | 08:11 AM
  #218  
Line Holder
10 Years
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 504
Likes: 12
From: 757/767
Default

Originally Posted by Speed Select
Haven’t read every post in this thread.

My take is we’ll see a massive drop in GSs. CS will leverage that we’re all “greedy bastard pilots” and keep those uncovered trips in open time longer. Meanwhile, the longer the cheese sits, pilots won’t be able to help themselves and WS, OOBWS, or YS. Anything that’s left over will go QS at the <8 hour point, but the money saved by WS/YSing pilots will be a net cost savings for the company, even considering 3x pay. The company wouldn’t agree to anything that didn’t cut costs.

We all suspect there are already deals happening between pilots and CS. I’ve personally seen the GS progression stop and suddenly be awarded as a WS/YS.

As a commuter, this is going to mean less opportunity to pick up green, IMO. Living in base is going to get A LOT more lucrative for pilots that want to fly/make more.
I don't see how the behavior is going to change when they are already letting trips sit in opentime.
Reply
Old 11-02-2025 | 08:15 AM
  #219  
Abouttime2fish's Avatar
Line Holder
Veteran: Marine Corp
10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,890
Likes: 162
From: MD88
Default

Originally Posted by OOfff
we basically made an ia step that will follow seniority order and be traceable instead of a free-for-all. that’s a good change
except it’s not IA, in fact it’s the opposite of IA.

whatever, the point is moo.
Reply
Old 11-02-2025 | 08:16 AM
  #220  
Line Holder
25M+ Airline Miles
20 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Jul 2023
Posts: 901
Likes: 260
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
They don't have to answer the phone and we required the automation prior to implementation. They can literally wait until report -2:12. The cost doesn't change, no impact to cost with a simpler process and an undefined timeline is EASIER for the scheduler and the company already has decided 3x is an acceptable cost. How do you not understand how easy we just made trip coverage without a quid?
I guess if you think answering the phone genuinely caused them any reluctance to hit the IA button, then this might be a small win for them.

I very much doubt that though. They're answering the phone constantly anyway, I'd be shocked if any one of them thought, "I really want to just send this out as an IA, but I don't want to answer the phone, so I won't."

I do agree that we screwed up on the automation side. We should only have given them a month. Even that is double what it should take. Someone familiar with the system could implement it in a day, they could test the snot out of it over the course of a week. The automation failure is temporary though, and has no impact on the overall effect of the MOU.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cactiboss
American
355
09-21-2015 05:20 PM
Doctor
American
250
01-29-2014 12:47 PM
R57 relay
American
86
01-06-2013 09:49 AM
TonyWilliams
Cargo
257
09-09-2010 04:31 PM
fr8rcaptain
Cargo
0
05-12-2009 03:20 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices