Search

Notices

MOU 25-05

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-19-2026 | 05:41 AM
  #2191  
Can’t find crew pickup
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,042
Likes: 195
Default

Originally Posted by iaflyer
I don't think trip coverage is going to work like you think it will - how do you think CS will get to QS?

A QS is just a step they'll skip to when time is critical. They'll almost always still pay a 23m7 pilot, it just the trip will go out to the senior person who raises their hand rather than a free for all that the IA process is right now.

Yes, that's a good thing but it's not going to change the trip coverage sequence.
It’ll be interesting because once they start a step, they have to finish it if I’m reading everything correctly. So the M7 payments will be concentrated even more senior because some junior guy who just happened to be up when they started skipping will not get it anymore.
Good thing is QS will have a counter, so no more IA7 to some rando deal maker/ somehow extremely lucky person.
Reply
Old 02-19-2026 | 06:11 AM
  #2192  
NuGuy's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,100
Likes: 86
Default

Originally Posted by iaflyer
I don't think trip coverage is going to work like you think it will - how do you think CS will get to QS?

A QS is just a step they'll skip to when time is critical. They'll almost always still pay a 23m7 pilot, it just the trip will go out to the senior person who raises their hand rather than a free for all that the IA process is right now.

Yes, that's a good thing but it's not going to change the trip coverage sequence.
They can't skip QS except for emergency trip coverage, and that is a very specific circumstance. That's when someone breaks their arm on a layover, and is in the hospital, and there's one departure out of a one-flight-per-day station where they just happen to have someone who lives there. It's not for routine trip filling out of a crew base. Even if they have that circumstance, then they're paying the original M7 pilot, plus the pilot who would have received the QS.
Reply
Old 02-19-2026 | 06:25 AM
  #2193  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 2,251
Likes: 1,107
Default

Originally Posted by Whoopsmybad
It’ll be interesting because once they start a step, they have to finish it if I’m reading everything correctly. So the M7 payments will be concentrated even more senior because some junior guy who just happened to be up when they started skipping will not get it anymore.
That’s incorrect. They can (and will) continue to stop coverage mid-step, even after all elements of MOU 25-05 are fully implemented.

What they can’t do anymore is skip pilots within a step, which was taking place frequently before MOU 25-05 was signed. Scheduling would often skip directly to pilots who had manually accepted a WS/GS, knowing that they were more likely to acknowledge the trip than an auto-accept. In other cases, dealmakers would call CS directly and request a trip at the WS/GS step without waiting their turn.

The company can still stop coverage mid-step, pay the affected M7 pilot whose turn it was when they stopped coverage, and skip to a later step of coverage (such as QS).
Reply
Old 02-19-2026 | 09:19 AM
  #2194  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 980
Likes: 78
Default

Originally Posted by Herkflyr
I'll be glad to see it. I will also be interested to see if QS actually become sort of rare, and good ol' GS come back to traditional levels. Why? Because now that true seniority will be honored, perhaps there won't be as many pilots across all seniority levels cynically putting in all manner of in and OOB slips with the sole goal to slow down trip coverage and force the 23.M.7/IA route.
I don't see how QS is a disincentive for the farmers to stop intentionally slowing trip coverage. And, yes, I will humbly eat crow when QS comes to fruition.

A5S
Reply
Old 02-19-2026 | 09:53 AM
  #2195  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,553
Likes: 100
From: Road construction signholder
Default

Originally Posted by All 5 Stages
I don't see how QS is a disincentive for the farmers to stop intentionally slowing trip coverage. And, yes, I will humbly eat crow when QS comes to fruition.

A5S
It is not a disincentive for the farmers. It does however restore seniority to the process of actually assigning the trip to the pilot who actually flies it.
Reply
Old 02-19-2026 | 10:44 AM
  #2196  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 161
Likes: 22
Default

Originally Posted by ancman
That’s incorrect. They can (and will) continue to stop coverage mid-step, even after all elements of MOU 25-05 are fully implemented.

What they can’t do anymore is skip pilots within a step, which was taking place frequently before MOU 25-05 was signed. Scheduling would often skip directly to pilots who had manually accepted a WS/GS, knowing that they were more likely to acknowledge the trip than an auto-accept. In other cases, dealmakers would call CS directly and request a trip at the WS/GS step without waiting their turn.

The company can still stop coverage mid-step, pay the affected M7 pilot whose turn it was when they stopped coverage, and skip to a later step of coverage (such as QS).
It seems like there's a lot of pilots who've never actually read 23 M 7. Maybe, you have, and I'm misunderstanding what you're getting at, but for those that think skipping ahead in the process is a contract violation. Read it. It just says "deviate from the sequences." That's pretty broad language. Where there's contract violations is when the affected pilot hasn't been paid. If they just skip WS and award it via GS, that's just as valid as skipping to IA unless there's some additional language somewhere that I haven't seen.

A Crew Scheduler may deviate from the sequences under Section 23 N. or O. when, in
their judgment, it is necessary to do so in order to maintain schedule integrity. In such
event, the pilot who would otherwise have been awarded/assigned the rotation will
receive pay and credit (or if applicable, single pay, no credit) for the scheduled value of
the rotation.
Reply
Old 02-19-2026 | 11:40 AM
  #2197  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2021
Posts: 1,243
Likes: 345
Default

Originally Posted by AirCoxswain
It seems like there's a lot of pilots who've never actually read 23 M 7. Maybe, you have, and I'm misunderstanding what you're getting at, but for those that think skipping ahead in the process is a contract violation. Read it. It just says "deviate from the sequences." That's pretty broad language. Where there's contract violations is when the affected pilot hasn't been paid. If they just skip WS and award it via GS, that's just as valid as skipping to IA unless there's some additional language somewhere that I haven't seen.

A Crew Scheduler may deviate from the sequences under Section 23 N. or O. when, in
their judgment, it is necessary to do so in order to maintain schedule integrity. In such
event, the pilot who would otherwise have been awarded/assigned the rotation will
receive pay and credit (or if applicable, single pay, no credit) for the scheduled value of
the rotation.
I think the distinction being made by ancman is whether the company can use 23M7 to skip pilots WITHIN THE SAME STEP. For example, 20 pilots with a WS, and 23M7 is used to award the assignment to pilot #15 without even calling #'s 1-14.

The comms in MOU 25-05 included the following:

"The MOU also codifies the Company may not concurrently run multiple steps of coverage or use M7 within a step of trip coverage."

"Within a step of trip coverage." So, it WOULD be a violation to do what I described above (skipping within a step.) Even IF the harmed pilot got paid.
Reply
Old 02-19-2026 | 11:46 AM
  #2198  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 2,251
Likes: 1,107
Default

Originally Posted by AirCoxswain
It seems like there's a lot of pilots who've never actually read 23 M 7. Maybe, you have, and I'm misunderstanding what you're getting at, but for those that think skipping ahead in the process is a contract violation. Read it. It just says "deviate from the sequences." That's pretty broad language. Where there's contract violations is when the affected pilot hasn't been paid. If they just skip WS and award it via GS, that's just as valid as skipping to IA unless there's some additional language somewhere that I haven't seen.

A Crew Scheduler may deviate from the sequences under Section 23 N. or O. when, in
their judgment, it is necessary to do so in order to maintain schedule integrity. In such
event, the pilot who would otherwise have been awarded/assigned the rotation will
receive pay and credit (or if applicable, single pay, no credit) for the scheduled value of
the rotation.
Correct. But pilots need to read both 23.M.7 and MOU 25-05, as the MOU amends much of the 23.M.7 language.

Skipping from WS to cover a trip using GS has always been, and still is, legal under 23.M.7 (as long as an affected pilot is paid).

Skipping pilots within a step (e.g. stopping coverage during WS pilot #5’s award window to award the trip to WS pilot #100) was formerly legal under 23.M.7, but no longer is following 25-05. This is what I was describing above.

Stopping coverage before a step is fully completed and using 23.M.7 to award a trip using a later step has always been, and still is legal.
Reply
Old 02-19-2026 | 11:51 AM
  #2199  
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,823
Likes: 169
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by Meme In Command
Us seniority-challenged folk starting next month:


"Dear schedulin',

I wrote you but you still ain't callin'. I left a White, a Yellow, and a Green slip at the bottom"
What if you had just one slip, the trip you always wanted, would you auto acknowledge it, or let it slip?
Reply
Old 02-19-2026 | 12:19 PM
  #2200  
Gunfighter's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
1M Airline Miles
On Reserve
Gets Weekends Off
50 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,543
Likes: 509
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
What if you had just one slip, the trip you always wanted, would you auto acknowledge it, or let it slip?
Palms are sweaty, knees weak, arms are heavy,.
There's a slip in iCrew, loaded and ready.
Nervous, but on the surface, looks calm and ready
To drop trips, but keeps on forgetting
The days are black, the whole category is under attack.
He clicked submit but the trip's not his.

Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cactiboss
American
355
09-21-2015 05:20 PM
Doctor
American
250
01-29-2014 12:47 PM
R57 relay
American
86
01-06-2013 09:49 AM
TonyWilliams
Cargo
257
09-09-2010 04:31 PM
fr8rcaptain
Cargo
0
05-12-2009 03:20 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices