Search

Notices

MOU 25-05

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-21-2026 | 01:40 PM
  #2291  
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,823
Likes: 169
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by Abouttime2fish
Anyone that gets a good deal should not, unless I get mine too. /s 🙄
No. it’s someone getting 7 “good deals” including 6 that should have been someone else’s good deal.
Reply
Old 02-21-2026 | 01:42 PM
  #2292  
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,823
Likes: 169
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by StoneQOLdCrazy
So how would it work? DALPA calls the company and says "hey, I know we start Section 6 in a few weeks, and you have your own burning needs, but could you help us out first? We need you to allocate IT resources to reprogram and test icrew to level 23M7 payouts. No, we're not going to address anything else. thanks." They'd shake their heads, laugh, and hang up.

And even if the MEC decided to try that while getting ready for section 6, and even if the company (being the rational, big-hearted employer they are) decided to do us a solid and say yes.... as soon as it got programmed in...around December (2027), Marcal or someone else will be here bitching that it's not fair, he's on track to lose 150% of last year's earnings.... and 23M7 needs to be leveled by the day and not the occurrence. I can think of several other potential snags in how that leveling would be applied. You've been here a while, I'm sure you can see some problems applying M7 leveling, too.

So yes. By default, it's a wind the clock issue.
Its absolutely not a wind the clock issue because it’s not hurting the company and only hurting all downline pilots who should be getting them. It’s not a leverage issue. It’s a free side letter. Not doing it gives us zero extra leverage.
Reply
Old 02-21-2026 | 01:55 PM
  #2293  
Valar Morghulis's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 475
Likes: 61
Default

Originally Posted by marcal

23M7 is a symptom of the disease and the disease is AA.
You aren’t even close. The real problem is level of open time.
Reply
Old 02-21-2026 | 01:55 PM
  #2294  
Roll’n Thunder
Community Influencer
15 Years
On Reserve
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,125
Likes: 548
From: Pilot
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
Its absolutely not a wind the clock issue because it’s not hurting the company and only hurting all downline pilots who should be getting them. It’s not a leverage issue. It’s a free side letter. Not doing it gives us zero extra leverage.
Except the company has zero motivation to fix a problem of ours without wanting a problem of theirs fixed in return. And any fix we give the company reduces section 6 leverage.

I mean I think 99% of the pilot group would be on board with spreading the 23m7 payments if the company would agree to do it for free. There’s just zero chance they agree to that.
Reply
Old 02-21-2026 | 02:04 PM
  #2295  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,577
Likes: 317
Default

Originally Posted by Valar Morghulis
You aren’t even close. The real problem is level of open time.
He’s dead on. The company doesn’t have time to take 12 minutes per person per step to cover trips. AA would be okay in theory if only pilots who wanted to fly put slips in, but that’s not what’s happening. Pilots are putting in blanket slips for entire month. I do the same thing. By the time I see it in open time, it’s too late. I don’t put on AA or auto acknowledge. If I get a call, I look at trip and accept it if I want it, then just wait. It is frustrating if it takes hours to award it to me. Sometimes it would be too late to commute up. AA will most likely be gone next contract. I don’t know the ratio of pilots that want it gone vs keeping it, but I know there are thousands on both sides.
Reply
Old 02-21-2026 | 02:21 PM
  #2296  
LumberJack's Avatar
Coverage Award...
Community Favorite
Loved
5 Years
20 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 1,708
Likes: 127
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
He’s dead on. The company doesn’t have time to take 12 minutes per person per step to cover trips. AA would be okay in theory if only pilots who wanted to fly put slips in, but that’s not what’s happening. Pilots are putting in blanket slips for entire month. I do the same thing. By the time I see it in open time, it’s too late. I don’t put on AA or auto acknowledge. If I get a call, I look at trip and accept it if I want it, then just wait. It is frustrating if it takes hours to award it to me. Sometimes it would be too late to commute up. AA will most likely be gone next contract. I don’t know the ratio of pilots that want it gone vs keeping it, but I know there are thousands on both sides.
That is false. Maybe you weren't here before ARCOS.

GS and IA used to be covered manually one at a time and we had the best reliability.

With proper staffing for both pilots and schedulers, more resilient trip construction, better usage of reserves, etc., the company solves their problem.
Reply
Old 02-21-2026 | 02:24 PM
  #2297  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2024
Posts: 836
Likes: 253
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
No. it’s someone getting 7 “good deals” including 6 that should have been someone else’s good deal.
is this the same as someone getting 600 hours in a month for using pb days? dunno.
Reply
Old 02-21-2026 | 02:37 PM
  #2298  
notEnuf's Avatar
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,242
Likes: 702
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by crewdawg
I'm all for extracting a big gain from the company in section 6 for this, but if the "status quo" continues, we'll probably have to start calling scheduling and asking them to at least run the WS step for particular trips, if we want to pickup close in trips. While some view the status quo as fine, it had degraded my QOL a quite a bit. They are getting a little better lately, but not even starting the WS step is crazy.
Once they start a step they have to finish it. If that looks like it will take too long, then 23M7 will go senior everytime because they cant count on the 100th person who actually wants that OBWS to actually have a chance to acknowledge it. They can't take the chance it doesn't finish, they can't skip a pilot(s) within a step and they can't run concurrent coverage on multiple steps.

This shifts the seniority problem back to where it should be, seniority order for the premium trip and senior slip holder that should have had the trip. The pick up limit is still the limiting factor so if a person has the entire month available by dropping trips or using the swap board they might get 90ish hours and then the next and so on. There is a pseudo leveling system but most people thinks not adequate but the 23M7ers will be under scrutiny and if they are given that credit there will be a remedy. You can see their pickup limit when viewing their schedule.
Reply
Old 02-21-2026 | 02:47 PM
  #2299  
crewdawg's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,436
Likes: 438
Default

Originally Posted by LumberJack
For something a week out I could see the problem, but if they're skipping WS the trip is fairly close-in. Come March you're now flying it as a QS instead. Isn't that a net gain?

Close-in WS are generally all I fly and I highly doubt I'll be getting 8-10 QS/month.


Originally Posted by notEnuf
Once they start a step they have to finish it. If that looks like it will take too long, then 23M7 will go senior everytime because they cant count on the 100th person who actually wants that OBWS to actually have a chance to acknowledge it. They can't take the chance it doesn't finish, they can't skip a pilot(s) within a step and they can't run concurrent coverage on multiple steps. This shifts the seniority problem back to where it should be, seniority order for the premium trip and senior slip holder that should have had the trip.

Hence why I say people who actually want to fly a WS, will have to call scheduling and tell them that they'll take the trip if they run it. Quite a few trips have gone IA with 5-10 hours to report, that I'd have gladly flown W if they had actually run the step. In my small category, even with the recent IA mess, there has rarely been more than 5-10 guys with a WS in for such trips. For us, it's OOBWSers that gum it all up.
Reply
Old 02-21-2026 | 02:57 PM
  #2300  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 2,249
Likes: 1,103
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
Once they start a step they have to finish it. If that looks like it will take too long, then 23M7 will go senior everytime because they cant count on the 100th person who actually wants that OBWS to actually have a chance to acknowledge it. They can't take the chance it doesn't finish, they can't skip a pilot(s) within a step and they can't run concurrent coverage on multiple steps.
The first sentence is incorrect. It’s been a common misconception ever since 25-05 was signed.

They absolutely can stop coverage before a step is fully completed. 25-05 simply requires scheduling to skip to a later step (such as QS) after stopping coverage mid-step and using 23.M.7. They can’t skip pilots within a step, meaning they can’t stop coverage at WS pilot #5 and award the trip to WS pilot #100.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cactiboss
American
355
09-21-2015 05:20 PM
Doctor
American
250
01-29-2014 12:47 PM
R57 relay
American
86
01-06-2013 09:49 AM
TonyWilliams
Cargo
257
09-09-2010 04:31 PM
fr8rcaptain
Cargo
0
05-12-2009 03:20 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices