Search

Notices

MOU 25-05

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-21-2026 | 05:55 PM
  #2311  
Line Holder
25M+ Airline Miles
20 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Jul 2023
Posts: 901
Likes: 259
Default

Originally Posted by StoneQOLdCrazy
And it's not even "free" for them. The coding costs to level 23M7 are real, and probably significant.
One person could do it in an afternoon. It's our own IT management that makes it difficult.
Reply
Old 02-21-2026 | 06:04 PM
  #2312  
LumberJack's Avatar
Coverage Award...
Community Favorite
Loved
5 Years
20 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 1,708
Likes: 127
Default

Originally Posted by Herkflyr
You're (deliberately and intentionally) leaving out an important part. GS were never proffers pre- ARCOS and neither were next day WS. Also literally zero pilots put in OOB anything without the hope that they would actually be awarded and fly such a trip. Those factors were all the difference in the world.
I left it out because they were treated like proffers. The overwhelming majority of pilots would look at the trip and call back within the window if they wanted it. If they didn't like it, the trip sat there until they moved to the next pilot. This was done with a human making calls.

The company made this bed.
Reply
Old 02-21-2026 | 06:14 PM
  #2313  
LumberJack's Avatar
Coverage Award...
Community Favorite
Loved
5 Years
20 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 1,708
Likes: 127
Default

Originally Posted by marcal
Despite our good operational stats pre-ARCOS, the company brought it in because it is super efficient at assigning available work in a rapid amount of time when used properly. ARCOS is used by utility companies to assign work when blizzards, hurricanes, and other calamities take out power, gas, and water lines.

Could you imagine if those workers had 12 minutes per person to respond to these situations? No. It would be a public nightmare. They blast them all, they get assigned ASAP and things get fixed.

It's only the most self entitled pilots that choose to put in slips, and then complain when those calls come in, that have somehow won the battle to put time restrictions in to the PWA.

It is baffling, aggravating and the company will never, ever put that power back in any labor groups hands. Why? Because it is absolutely ridiculous and anathema to running a business.
I can't believe a pilot is advocating for unlimited batch sizes. My entire point was Delta had a workable solution for years and screwed it all up starting with ARCOS. The app itself is not the point, it's the change in how they covered things AND how much they needed to cover AND how many reserves were available to cover.
Reply
Old 02-21-2026 | 07:30 PM
  #2314  
Can’t find crew pickup
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,042
Likes: 193
Default

Originally Posted by tennisguru
Speaking of semantics, 23m7 WS payments will take you to the WS pickup limit, not ALV.

In other words, whoops, your bad...
fair enough.
whoops
Reply
Old 02-21-2026 | 08:25 PM
  #2315  
20Fathoms's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,418
Likes: 162
Default

Originally Posted by Herkflyr
You're (deliberately and intentionally) leaving out an important part. GS were never proffers pre- ARCOS and neither were next day WS. Also literally zero pilots put in OOB anything without the hope that they would actually be awarded and fly such a trip. Those factors were all the difference in the world.
True about WS and I’m fine going back to that. But not true about GS. They were not proffers in every single way that mattered. I passed on dozens and dozens, you wouldn’t be able to do that if they weren’t proffers. All you had to do was not answer the phone and they moved on.

You could even go into Icrew and view the trip to see if you liked it. As long as you didn’t enter your pin, they moved on after 10 min. They were “technically” not proffers in the same way IAs are “technically” now inverse.

Let’s keep GS the way the are. Fix the OOBWS problem and if that’s not enough make WS not proffers like they used to be but leave GS alone, they have a good enough take rate not to bog down trip coverage.
Reply
Old 02-22-2026 | 04:57 AM
  #2316  
GutterGuard's Avatar
Line Holder
On Reserve
 
Joined: Sep 2025
Posts: 962
Likes: 745
Default

Originally Posted by LumberJack
I can't believe a pilot is advocating for unlimited batch sizes. My entire point was Delta had a workable solution for years and screwed it all up starting with ARCOS. The app itself is not the point, it's the change in how they covered things AND how much they needed to cover AND how many reserves were available to cover.
Marcal and a few others have been very vocal about their willingness to give up portions of our contract for absolutely nothing.
Reply
Old 02-22-2026 | 05:20 AM
  #2317  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 2,249
Likes: 1,103
Default

Originally Posted by 20Fathoms
Let’s keep GS the way the are. Fix the OOBWS problem and if that’s not enough make WS not proffers like they used to be but leave GS alone, they have a good enough take rate not to bog down trip coverage.
A non-proffer WS/OOBWS/GS is not even legally possible under part 117, with less than 10 hours to report.

If we had an obligation to respond to every call from the company and report for every rotation placed on our schedule, then we’d never truly be in rest. It would be a 24/7 RAP as far as the FAA is concerned.

Thus why in the pre-ARCOS days, even though GS and WS were labeled as “not a proffer”, they really were. You could ignore your phone all day long if you chose.

Going forward with ARCOS, every second/next/same-day slip will always be a proffer. Any potential negotiations will likely focus on selling parts of auto-accept.

Last edited by ancman; 02-22-2026 at 05:30 AM.
Reply
Old 02-22-2026 | 05:22 AM
  #2318  
notEnuf's Avatar
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,242
Likes: 700
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by 20Fathoms
True about WS and I’m fine going back to that. But not true about GS. They were not proffers in every single way that mattered. I passed on dozens and dozens, you wouldn’t be able to do that if they weren’t proffers. All you had to do was not answer the phone and they moved on.

You could even go into Icrew and view the trip to see if you liked it. As long as you didn’t enter your pin, they moved on after 10 min. They were “technically” not proffers in the same way IAs are “technically” now inverse.

Let’s keep GS the way the are. Fix the OOBWS problem and if that’s not enough make WS not proffers like they used to be but leave GS alone, they have a good enough take rate not to bog down trip coverage.
We didn't even have pins back then. You just looked at the daily trip coverage and not your schedule to see the trip and then ignore as necessary.
Reply
Old 02-22-2026 | 05:24 AM
  #2319  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 2,249
Likes: 1,103
Default

Originally Posted by GutterGuard
Marcal and a few others have been very vocal about their willingness to give up portions of our contract for absolutely nothing.
Fortunately the negotiating committee is tuning out the noise from these guys this time around.
Reply
Old 02-22-2026 | 05:48 AM
  #2320  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 147
Likes: 15
Default

Why is the focus of so many on getting rid of AA instead of getting rid of the need to both accept and acknowledge a trip? I don't understand why the 2 step process exists in the first place. Everyone puts in AA in order to basically make it a 1 step process, so why not just make it a 1 step process in exchange for a big quid elsewhere in the contract?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cactiboss
American
355
09-21-2015 05:20 PM
Doctor
American
250
01-29-2014 12:47 PM
R57 relay
American
86
01-06-2013 09:49 AM
TonyWilliams
Cargo
257
09-09-2010 04:31 PM
fr8rcaptain
Cargo
0
05-12-2009 03:20 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices