![]() |
|
Originally Posted by newKnow
(Post 1198697)
As a thick-skinned ex-NWA guy, I really don't care that some of you guys always seem to bring up our history in a somewhat negative light -- as if we serve as an example of what not to do. I am more than willing to refute and defend the NWA pilot groups history. But, is this really part of the discussion you want to have, or are you just trying to jab us?
P.S. I think we did pretty good in 1998. It is not my intent to bring up the strike in a negative light. It was my intent to show the results that two different strikes (yours and Spirit) produced. You guys had no choice but to strike. You had a management team that thought they could "win". Your management team was very, very wrong. You guys did good. Again, I'm not trying to poke a very honorable effort, but to put context into the discussion of those calling for a "fight." In 1998 your contract (and mine) was in a far different place than 4th in the industry with a TA that would take you to first. Sorry that my post created the impression of an attack. |
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 1198615)
Please go through each of the recent negotiations in our industry. Tell me about the timeline of the successful strike at Spirit which put them well below this TA. Or the effective tactics that produced a timely contract at APA, NPA, CAL, UAL, LCC, ASA/ExpressJet, PCL.
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 1198607)
How is SWAPA's negotiation going for their 9/30/12 amendable date?
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 1198607)
Any other examples?
Carl |
Originally Posted by hockeypilot44;1195599.
It's the military guys that don't think for themselves that are going to vote this in.
|
Originally Posted by LivingTheDream
(Post 1198620)
I really don't understand the debate on this TA. In 2015, the 7er will pay $216. In 2004, the 7er paid 267. So 11 years later, it will pay $51 less (or 19% less). 11 years later!
Did anyone think we would have any chance of meaningful restoration without a fight? If we have any hope of truly restoring this profession, we will have to go to the mattresses. Period. (It definitely won't come from a 2 month, Neville Chamberlin, peace in our time, TA. This not an LOA/MOU. This is our 1st section 6 since BK. I would hope our goal would be significant (i.e., large) gains in all areas of the contract. I for one, am not ready to throw the towel in on this profession. I hope that the majority agrees. Carl |
Originally Posted by Tomcat
(Post 1198736)
Unbelievable! You're an idiot and should be completely ashamed of yourself, especially on Memorial Day weekend. Why don't you get over yourself and go do some volunteer work at the local VA hospital. :mad:
|
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 1198628)
You realize that in 2015 Delta pilots will be leading the industry (again) in pay rates?
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 1198628)
Oh, can you show me how those "fighting" unions have produced better results? Maybe an NWA guy can remind us how much of a pay rate increase they got after a 14 day lockout in 1998.
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 1198628)
I'm all for a fight if it gets us better results.
But you don't need to worry about fighting anyway. This contract doesn't apply to you MEC bureaucrats who get the 92 hours of FPL on the highest equipment you can hold. I know you just don't get why anyone would fight over somethng as good as you have it. Carl |
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 1198650)
Then your rep was misinformed or misheard your question. Detailed costing was briefed to the MEC.
Carl |
Hey folks, don't get distracted and get into the FDAL vs. FNWA or Military vs. Civilian. We are all one despite our backgrounds. If we don't get this right, all of the contracts of the past will seem like the glory days. Let's get this profession moving forward, time to change the trend line.
|
Originally Posted by LivingTheDream
(Post 1198663)
Three basic questions:
1. Is ALPA a representational entity?
Originally Posted by LivingTheDream
(Post 1198663)
2. Does this TA represent our survey results?
Originally Posted by LivingTheDream
(Post 1198663)
3. Will we see the survey results prior to the vote?
Carl |
Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy
(Post 1198691)
Question ...
RA on said on his weekly message that we are moving into Phase II of the LGA expansion. He mentioned that initially many of the destinations were started with DCI aircraft. Now that the process has matured, we are up gauging the routes to mainline aircraft. He said to check DLNET to see the changes. Where on DLNET is this? Is he meaning going to TravelNet to view the changes? Or is there a listing of all of the equipment changes on DLNET? I've scoured the website and couldn't find anything. Thanks ... Delta Continues New York Growth with Expanded Caribbean, Bermuda, Florida Service Airline adds new and expanded flights to 10 popular destinations from LaGuardia, JFK May 21, 2012 NEW YORK, May 21, 2012 /PRNewswire/ -- Delta Air Lines (NYSE: DAL) today announced new and expanded service to 10 popular destinations in the Caribbean, Bermuda and Florida from LaGuardia Airport and John F. Kennedy International Airport, continuing its historic expansion in New York. The new flights, which will begin in late 2012 and early 2013, are in addition to Delta's previously announced expansion at New York-LaGuardia, where the airline is adding more than 100 new flights to 26 new destinations this summer. When its full schedule is implemented, Delta will operate more than 260 daily flights between LaGuardia and more than 60 cities, exceeding any other carrier. Delta also is optimizing its schedule at JFK to facilitate convenient connections to international flights. JFK is a major global gateway for Delta, which operates nonstop flights to more than 45 international destinations from the airport. "We're excited to be announcing new and expanded service to these popular leisure destinations at the same time we're building our new domestic hub at LaGuardia Airport," said Gail Grimmett, Delta's senior vice president – New York. "It's another step toward achieving our goal of becoming the preferred airline in New York." In conjunction with its expansion at LaGuardia, Delta is investing $160 million to modernize two terminals at the airport and construct a new walkway connecting the facilities. At JFK, Delta is currently under way on a $1.2 billion program to enhance and expand Terminal 4, adding nine new gates and creating a state-of-the-art gateway for New York's fastest growing global airline. That facility will open in spring 2013. New and expanded service to the Caribbean and Bermuda includes: New daily year-round service between LaGuardia and Bermuda. New Saturday flights between JFK and St. Maarten.* LaGuardia-Nassau flights will be expanded from seasonal to year-round service. JFK-Montego Bay, Jamaica, flights will grow from Saturday seasonal to daily service. JFK-Aruba service will increase from Saturday seasonal flights to daily year-round service. JFK-Punta Cana, Dominican Republic, flights will expand from Saturday seasonal to daily year-round service. New and expanded service to Florida includes: Two new flights between LaGuardia and Sarasota, Fla. A new flight between JFK and Fort Myers, Fla. A fourth daily flight between LaGuardia and Fort Myers. A fifth daily flight between LaGuardia and Miami. A fifth daily flight between LaGuardia and Tampa. A second daily flight between JFK and Tampa. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:56 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands