![]() |
|
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 1198535)
Alfa and Slow:
Wrt to the ratios in DCI and the 717: Are the ratios based upon known retirements and deliveries? Do the ratios include adding the 717? Do the ratios guarantee growth or just no more stagnation? If the company gets all 88 717's and exercises all options for the 76 seat platform, what will mainlines fleet count be? DCI? If you are unwilling or unable to answer the above question; given the ratios and known fleet plan at mainline, how many growth 717's would we be getting over current mainline jet count? A follow on: What is the expected ratio of mainline growth to newly allowed 76 seat jets. Less than 1:1 in favor of DCI? Better than 1:1? If so by how much? What these ratios seems to imply is one "growth" snb to every newly allowed large 76 seat jet. The numbers guys are saying best case we see a fleet of about 770 or about where we were at SOC. Please show your work. I am curious about this and what real growth if any this will result in with the work rule changes. Thanks, Want to make an informed vote. Bump........still waiting for these questions to be answered. Anyone? alfaromeo? Anyone? slowplay? Anyone? :D |
Originally Posted by LivingTheDream
(Post 1198620)
I really don't understand the debate on this TA. In 2015, the 7er will pay $216. In 2004, the 7er paid 267. So 11 years later, it will pay $51 less (or 19% less). 11 years later!
Did anyone think we would have any chance of meaningful restoration without a fight? If we have any hope of truly restoring this profession, we will have to go to the mattresses. Period. (It definitely won't come from a 2 month, Neville Chamberlin, peace in our time, TA. This not an LOA/MOU. This is our 1st section 6 since BK. I would hope our goal would be significant (i.e., large) gains in all areas of the contract. I for one, am not ready to throw the towel in on this profession. I hope that the majority agrees. |
Originally Posted by 1234
(Post 1198641)
I did not work under C2K as I was at NWA. I have to say that this contract puts the pay rates above the NWA pre bk rates (restoration?). With C2K, how much was put in your 401K account by the company, which is your money not matter what the company decides to do?
|
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 1198623)
The MEC was briefed on costing. Direct compensation is "hard" numbers. Much of the changes to Section 1 have very different costs in the eyes of management and ALPA (JV protections, code share restrictions, furlough protections) so are "soft" numbers. The manning changes created by this agreement are dependent on business plan execution so are "soft" numbers. All of that was briefed.
If Delta was going to save $1billion in RJ costs and put $1billion in your pocket instead how are you worse off?:confused: As to "cost neutral"...again, this agreement takes money out of one of Delta's accounting silos and puts it into ours, a significant plus for pilots. Delta management has a very different target audience (we're less than 1/6 of the employee group) and a lot of interested parties in New York City and Washington, D.C. Note that Bastian was at a financial conference both the day after the TA was announced and the day after our TA was ratified by the MEC "explaining" it to investors. I asked about costing, specifically about the productivity concessions. I spoke to a rep who told me the MEC has not seen real costing in years. So again, where is the costing on these concessions? Who directed the MEC to transfer overtime flying from senior to junior pilots? From slowplay: "If Delta was going to save $1billion in RJ costs and put $1billion in your pocket instead how are you worse off?:confused: " So you are saying DAL is giving us $1B the took from the RJ's? Really? And more like Bastian was bragging to the investors how this is cost neutral and "institutionalizes" our BK agreement. |
Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
(Post 1198589)
You have to at least be honest with the numbers. We lost 2 percent in profit sharing so that 12.8 is lower. To get this, we sold scope which is the equivalent to selling our jobs. Not good. Our new scope is not an improvement. I'm tire of reading that and hearing that. Stop patting yourselves on the back. YOU FAILED AND FAILED MISERABLY!!!! THIS WILL PROBABLY LEAD TO ALPA BEING DE-CERTIFIED!!!!
We really didn't lose this 2 percent. We guaranteed it to be payed out to us. Lets say we have another "Bird Flu" epidemic and the company doesn't make a dime, well guess what, we still get that 2 %. Lets say the company makes the same amount they did 2 years ago which gave us a 6% profit sharing payout, guess what, with these current rates, you are still going to get a bigger check than you did 2 years ago. You can not say that scope is not an improvement. It really is, it just isn't as big an improvement as I (and most others) would like to see. We gave up those 76 seat jets during bk (actually I didn't get to vote on it because I was on the street looking in, where were you). This actually has hard limits on numbers of aircraft and is for once tied to block hours and not number of airframes. That was the constant complaint from many of us prior, is that the company could have a ton of mainline aircraft on the books (just sitting on various ramps, deserts, etc) but are spares and not actually in full time service yet still be in compliance with the contract. |
Originally Posted by 1234
(Post 1198641)
I did not work under C2K as I was at NWA. I have to say that this contract puts the pay rates above the NWA pre bk rates (restoration?). With C2K, how much was put in your 401K account by the company, which is your money not matter what the company decides to do?
The second DC plan was our 401K. C2K increased the company contribution from 2% to 3% of eligible salary, but the first (approximate, as it varied by member) $1500 was in company ESOP stock. That stock was valued at $72 per share and just before bankruptcy was converted to common at about 1.7-1. It was sold by the trustee for next to nothing, so all those company contributions were wiped out. |
Originally Posted by flyallnite
(Post 1198644)
I can't recall the exact percentage, but under the Money Purchase Pension Plan, it was a considerable amount, to offset the company plan.
|
Originally Posted by DoubleTrouble
(Post 1198645)
I asked about costing, specifically about the productivity concessions. I spoke to a rep who told me the MEC has not seen real costing in years. So again, where is the costing on these concessions? Who directed the MEC to transfer overtime flying from senior to junior pilots?
Originally Posted by DoubleTrouble
(Post 1198645)
From slowplay: "If Delta was going to save $1billion in RJ costs and put $1billion in your pocket instead how are you worse off?:confused: "
So you are saying DAL is giving us $1B the took from the RJ's? Really? And more like Bastian was bragging to the investors how this is cost neutral and "institutionalizes" our BK agreement.
Originally Posted by scambo1
(Post 1198131)
You can choose to believe whatever you want, but you poison the (reasoning) pool if you put your hope and theory out there as fact. |
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 1198637)
Bump........still waiting for these questions to be answered. Anyone? alfaromeo? Anyone? slowplay? Anyone? :D
|
just curious if other new aircraft have been dangled as a carrot in previous contracts-anybody know? I know they have been used at some regionals for whipsaw purposes.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:46 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands