![]() |
|
Originally Posted by finis72
(Post 1208251)
Elvis, I can see you are not a math major. If I were you I would delete the post, it's embarrassing.
|
Originally Posted by Elvis90
(Post 1208243)
"I was at the Atlanta North roadshow
$1,290,000,000 is a bit of a stretch We are not getting $430M a year at day 1,*Its going to be drawn out over 3.5 years 2012 4% day 1, end of 2012 we are at $40M but we already gave up higher crew utilization(paid for) 2013 8.5% of which we trade 2% profit sharing nets 6.5% equals net $210M(assuming straightline profit) 2014 $210M plus 1% or $20M (since 2% profit sharing is substituted for hard $$$) = $230M 2015 $210M + $40M= $250M Grand total approx $730M We need $80M to $100M a year just to keep up with inflation or $350M over 3.5 years so we are giving up(selling) more 76 seat SNB jets to the commuter, better reserve utilization (ALV+15) higher crew utilization (current ALV cap +2) for $730M which is a paltry $380M over our cost of living. Leaves a sour taste in my mouth, we are making our increases by working harder and relaxing scope. Cost neutral means we pay for the raises not someone else." |
Originally Posted by finis72
(Post 1208251)
Elvis, I can see you are not a math major. If I were you I would delete the post, it's embarrassing.
2013 - $210M 2014 - $230M 2015 - $250M Total - $730M Please tell me where the math is wrong? And you're right, I wasn't a math major; I was an Aeronautical Engineering Major. That was my Bachelor's; my Master's is in Mechanical Engineering. I thought about Air Force Test Pilot School, but elected to fly the B-1 bomber instead. What was your Master's Degree in? |
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 1208254)
I think he cut and paste it from the DALPA forum. I'm not disagreeing with you, but could you show us the correct math?
|
Originally Posted by Elvis90
(Post 1208261)
You are correct sir, just a cut & paste.
I have an accounting degree and so I had to jump on what appears to me to be not factual cost analysis. Sorry about the math comment, I did what I complain about and that's attacking the poster. |
Originally Posted by finis72
(Post 1208268)
The 4% initial raise is every year for 31/2 years, the 6.5% is every year for 3 years etc. The 2% profit sharing reduction is every year but not compounded and that's only if DL makes 2 bil from 2013 to 2015, if they make less then our reduction will be less than 2%.
I have an accounting degree and so I had to jump on what appears to me to be not factual cost analysis. Sorry about the math comment, I did what I complain about and that's attacking the poster. |
Originally Posted by Elvis90
(Post 1208270)
No problem dude. Let's get all the facts out - if you have them, please post them so we can all be informed.
|
Originally Posted by Elvis90
(Post 1208270)
No problem dude. Let's get all the facts out - if you have them, please post them so we can all be informed.
|
Originally Posted by finis72
(Post 1208287)
I've heard 3 different sets of numbers ranging from 730 mil to a little over 1 bil. Using your original post on this subject you used an inflation number of 350 mil. Food for thought; if we vote no and get tabled by the NMB(a real possibility) then in 2015 we will have given up 1.08 bil (730 +350) in total costs and to make that up we will have to get 1.81 bil ( thats using the low number 730)in contract cost day 1 ! I don't think that will happen. Compounding is a wonderful thing or a terrible thing,just depends what side of the fence you are on. You say that's worse case I say that is the more than likely outcome and I think that's where our major difference lies. I'm good with either yay or nay on this TA, but yay is more financially sound.
10,850 pilots (from DAL's 2011 10-K) Average $130,000/year (a complete WAG on my part, but we can vary it) In 2011 ... Total pilot wages were $1,410,000,000 = 10,850 pilots x $130,000 + 4% on Jan 1, 2012 = $1,467,000,000 in total pilot costs 2012 - 4% - $28M = $1.467B x 0.04 x 1/2 (for half a year) 2013 - 12.8% - $180M = $1.467B x .128 2014 - 16.2% - $228M = etc. 2015 - 19.7. - $278M = etc. Total - $722M = $28+$180+$228+$278M over 3 1/2 years. The 4/12.8/16.2/19.7% numbers are from a Negotiator's Notepad. So I think 3/4 of a Billion is the Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) for this contract. This is my best guess, not a cut & paste. Dang, that's close to the $730M from the guy on the DALPA forums. This doesn't include inflation, which would reduce our raise significantly. As a good friend has told me, this is about a 10% raise plus inflation. What was the savings on the 50-seaters? |
Originally Posted by finis72
(Post 1208268)
The 4% initial raise is every year for 31/2 years, the 6.5% is every year for 3 years etc. The 2% profit sharing reduction is every year but not compounded and that's only if DL makes 2 bil from 2013 to 2015, if they make less then our reduction will be less than 2%.
I have an accounting degree and so I had to jump on what appears to me to be not factual cost analysis. Sorry about the math comment, I did what I complain about and that's attacking the poster. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:24 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands