![]() |
|
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 1209566)
I know this is an extreme example, but I'm just trying to make sure I understand this new rule.
If said reserve pilot is at 52+44, could he be assigned a trip that would cause him to exceed "his" guarantee? Or is done?
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 1209566)
Also, if a reserve has no known absences for the month then in your example he would be subject to 75+30. So if he is at 75+29, can he be assigned a trip that would take him to 92+30?
|
Originally Posted by Express pilot
(Post 1209655)
18 on SC 6/12 ATL88B. Is that a record?
|
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 1209673)
Yes, he could be assigned a trip until he reaches his guarantee.
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 1209673)
Yes, he could be assigned a single trip that took him over his reserve guarantee up to ALV+15, or in this case a trip worth 17+01. All normal reserve assigment criteria still have to be met (days of availability, RAW, etc). In your example the pilot has 18 days on call and 12 or 13 X days (30 or 31 day month). To get to the 92+30 he would have to be paid and credited with a daily average of 5+08 for each of his 18 on call days. He would also be subject to the ADG calculation of 4+30 for each rotation and the Reserve Lookback Guarantee of 5+15 per day.
|
Originally Posted by Express pilot
(Post 1209655)
18 on SC 6/12 ATL88B. Is that a record?
|
Is it just me or would the next logical iteration of the reserve change be to make trips completely equal (ADG gets it a lot closer than current book) and to limit res pilots to ALV +7.5 (which would be the LCW max)?
I hope to see that as a possibility either when the FTDT change negotiations ensue/next merger/ Sect. 6... Thoughts? |
Originally Posted by shiznit
(Post 1209706)
Is it just me or would the next logical iteration of the reserve change be to make trips completely equal (ADG gets it a lot closer than current book) and to limit res pilots to ALV +7.5 (which would be the LCW max)?
I hope to see that as a possibility either when the FTDT change negotiations ensue/next merger/ Sect. 6... Thoughts? You read my mind. I figured the adequate quid would be ALV+7.5 since that is the max a line holder could get assigned in a month. What you ask though requires negotiating capital from the TA. It would cost something to get that 7.5hrs per reserve back. |
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 1209685)
Notice that big line of weather to the SE of ATL? :D
Sorry its down too 15 now. Glad your voting No on this TA. |
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 1209731)
You read my mind. I figured the adequate quid would be ALV+7.5 since that is the max a line holder could get assigned in a month. What you ask though requires negotiating capital from the TA. It would cost something to get that 7.5hrs per reserve back.
|
Just heard word from my MX buddy in SFO that a 777 Capt's daughter got busted with 10lbs of weed wrapped in aluminum foil on a non rev flight from SFO-ATL. Any word?
|
Originally Posted by cni187
(Post 1209810)
Just heard word from my MX buddy in SFO that a 777 Capt's daughter got busted with 10lbs of weed wrapped in aluminum foil on a non rev flight from SFO-ATL. Any word?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:29 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands