Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

sailingfun 08-14-2012 03:54 PM


Originally Posted by Mesabah (Post 1245595)
I agree with what you're saying, but I will add that under labor law, no scope contract is a solid scope contract. Permitted flying must be specially stated in a scope contract for it to be legally outsourced. So while it appeared that scope was being restricted in that contract, it was actually being sold off.

Then explain how ASA flew 100 seat 4 engine jets that was not stated in the contract. Your statement above is incorrect. Delta until the 91 contract essentially had no scope at all. It was a long fight to get what we achieved. In every contract since 91 scope was one of the last issues decided. It came well after pay in most contracts. In the 01 contract pay was already set in stone almost a year before scope.

Roadkill 08-14-2012 03:57 PM

Where is there a list of who are LCPs at our category? I know you can see "reg" or "LCP" on your rotation, but is there a list somewhere? I don't see any difference when looking at the roster, pairings, wide, or reasons reports.

sailingfun 08-14-2012 03:59 PM


Originally Posted by sinca3 (Post 1245582)
Midnight tonight is deadline for old people to pull their bids for the early out. What is the final number we are going to see?
My best guess is 17 will pull their papers leaving 234 heading for the door

One of the interesting things about the ER program is that while the number taking the program was lower then expected the age of pilots taking the program was also lower then expected. The end result is that the 250 leaving will have a much better long term impact for the pilot group then if they had reached the 300 number they hoped for yet they had been the older pilots in the expected demographic.

galaxy flyer 08-14-2012 03:59 PM

Bucking Bar

Randy as EA MEC Chair would be news to me and I was on the BOS LEC from '87-'89. Jack Bavis was MEC Chair from '87 to the end during the strike when replaced by Copeland, I think it was. Larry Schulte preceded Jack and Randy was at ALPA National during that time, because I met him there.

Yes, we did have side letters for Bar Harbor, who went bust when we did, but early turboprops and DC-3s are a far cry from today's deals. Hell, DCI's "jumbo" RJ is bigger than EA's fleet--284 to 325. Yes, the industry is bigger, but stll".....

Yes, Pan Am did right by taking Ransome, making it PAA Express. A friend of mine was #1 there, went to PAA mainline on the A310, retired from DAL.

GF

I hate auto correct!

acl65pilot 08-14-2012 04:03 PM


Originally Posted by Timbo (Post 1245577)
That is one fugley airplane!

It's amazing how they can take something nice, like a King Air and...destroy it!

Never trust anything that needs that much crap hanging off the back end to stabilize it :eek:

acl65pilot 08-14-2012 04:07 PM


Originally Posted by tsquare (Post 1245543)
You are gonna rocket thru the rest of your career. 5 years from now you will be where I am right now (in terms of seat progression). 10 years from now you won't give a rat's ass about 70 seat airplanes.

As to your musings about the pension and all... just... wow.

T

Many of us including myself will always care about how we define our flying and the most junior to the most senior pilot on our list. Individual seniority has little or anything to do with it.

Hoser 08-14-2012 04:12 PM


Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 1245630)
Then explain how ASA flew 100 seat 4 engine jets that was not stated in the contract. Your statement above is incorrect. Delta until the 91 contract essentially had no scope at all. It was a long fight to get what we achieved. In every contract since 91 scope was one of the last issues decided. It came well after pay in most contracts. In the 01 contract pay was already set in stone almost a year before scope.

ASA had an agreement w/ Delta and Delta pilots (MEC?) for BAE-146 configured with 88 seats. I think we had maybe 5-6 of them. One was white w/ 100 seats and supposedly was a spare or loaner. ASA was allowed to acquire up to 20 of them but never got beyond the 5-6.

Mesabah 08-14-2012 04:13 PM


Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 1245630)
Then explain how ASA flew 100 seat 4 engine jets that was not stated in the contract. Your statement above is incorrect. Delta until the 91 contract essentially had no scope at all. It was a long fight to get what we achieved. In every contract since 91 scope was one of the last issues decided. It came well after pay in most contracts. In the 01 contract pay was already set in stone almost a year before scope.

Where are the court cases where ALPA battled the company over DCI scope? Other than ALPA saying they fought hard for it every time in contract negotiations, there is no other evidence to support that it actually happened, unless I missed it.

Timbo 08-14-2012 04:17 PM


Originally Posted by acl65pilot (Post 1245637)
Never trust anything that needs that much crap hanging off the back end to stabilize it :eek:

Exactly! I used to call it, "The Ice Macine". Anything that needs that many extra strakes to make it fly straight...well...it shouldn't be flying in the first place!

acl65pilot 08-14-2012 04:18 PM


Originally Posted by Hoser (Post 1245641)
ASA had an agreement w/ Delta and Delta pilots (MEC?) for BAE-146 configured with 88 seats. I think we had maybe 5-6 of them. One was white w/ 100 seats and supposedly was a spare or loaner. ASA was allowed to acquire up to 20 of them but never got beyond the 5-6.

That one white 146 was a mtc spare we were given while the others went though D check in Bna. The year was 1997.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:04 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands