|
|
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1269605)
Sure he's elligible, but by a technicality.
It's in the C&BLs, it's the category you are in at time of nomination, hardly a "technicality", that determines whether you can run as an FO or CA. Of course you know this, but as an APC moderator, we can always count on you to lower the level of discussion with disingenuous statements. |
Originally Posted by TANSTAAFL
(Post 1269762)
According to the DPA website
|
Never mind, won't go there.
|
..........
|
Originally Posted by bigbusdriver . I'm hearing that another poster wasn't right, that it wasn't DPA that went to the CPO. Did TT go to the CPO rather than ProStan over the DPA jumpseat issue? I'd have a real problem if my ALPA representative went to the company first. What's the truth, as you guys seem to be so connected?
Originally Posted by TANSTAAFL
(Post 1269548)
Since you are referring to your representative I'm guessing you are C20 in which case you could contact TT yourself and ask. I don't have a clue. This and the C54 question need to be asked of the representatives directly.
|
Originally Posted by 76drvr
(Post 1269814)
Yeah right, a "technicality." Is that the same "technicality" that allows Phil Martin, the most senior FO running and a NYC based pilot, to bounce from base to base running for office?
It's in the C&BLs, it's the category you are in at time of nomination, hardly a "technicality", that determines whether you can run as an FO or CA. Of course you know this, but as an APC moderator, we can always count on you to lower the level of discussion with disingenuous statements. I prefer F/O reps actually receive F/O pay, not captain pay, for the entire term. For obvious reasons. Less of an issue for me is a F/O that lives in the base he represents, but doesn't fly out of. He is still a F/O. |
Originally Posted by 76drvr
(Post 1269819)
A 54 rep that hasn't flown in over a year and a 20 rep supposedly running to the CPO to turn in a fellow pilot. Wow, this should be interesting.
FWIW, I checked the reasons report and saw that the 54 rep was bidding lines in August. Unless i misread it, he bid for a 10+ day trip over the 4day August MEC meeting, got assigned an 11 day trip. I understand that he only spent 2 days at the meeting, not sure if he took an 11 day trip drop. |
Originally Posted by 76drvr
(Post 1269819)
A 54 rep that hasn't flown in over a year and a 20 rep supposedly running to the CPO to turn in a fellow pilot. Wow, this should be interesting.
FWIW, I checked the reasons report and saw that the 54 rep was bidding lines in August. Unless i misread it, he bid for a 10+ day trip over the 4day August MEC meeting, got assigned an 11 day trip. I understand that he only spent 2 days at the meeting, not sure if he took an 11 day trip drop. Can we start a thread where DALPA guys can tag team each others' posts to slam fellow ALPA guys?:D |
Originally Posted by scambo1
(Post 1269833)
So I guess you must have been too lazy to check his aug sched before badmouthing him. This is getting old.
Can we start a thread where DALPA guys can tag team each others' posts to slam fellow ALPA guys?:D |
Originally Posted by 76drvr
(Post 1269839)
Who said I was a DALPA guy?
Noone. However, when all the DALPA lovers pour out of the woodwork on the same page as each other, logic would dictate that they have coordinated. Plus, I have read your previous posts. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:09 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands