![]() |
|
I've brought this up before: in my newhire class of 28 from Sept 2010, 3 have left - 2 for SWA and 1 for FedEx, mainly for commuting reasons. The domiciles of those companies worked out better for them.
With the AirTran merger, I would not want to apply to SWA right now. FedEx will continue to hire for some time according to the last FedEx pilot I've talked to. I think UCAL has a great network, but they have poor mgt-labor relations, and that merger is still thorny. My friends leaving the military are now applying either to FedEx or Delta, and I'm trying to steer them our way. I agree that the stagnation is frustrating (being here only two years, I haven't experienced it) - I'm thinking more of year 2000 hires and guys that were furloughed, that's got to be a nasty experience. Looking ahead, I think Delta is the only US airline company that is poised to take advantage of opportunities because our merger is complete, our labor groups are fairly content, and debt is being paid off. |
Originally Posted by dragon
(Post 1272385)
I take it you see it differently?
|
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 1272380)
Nice.
GMAFB. |
Originally Posted by dragon
(Post 1272375)
Sink,
Normally I like what you have to say. In this case I was specifically speaking about T and sailing. Two who routinely champion the idea that if you're not happy, leave. I was attempting to commiserate with others here. Obviously I touched a nerve and for that I apologize. I know Delta is a great company, I'm just frustrated that every time we're told lies and half truths to attempt to keep morale up. On the bottom, or the middle we can't move up relatively speaking without new hiring at the bottom. I don't plan on leaving Delta, but does that mean I can't be dissatisfied with where I sit and the apparent stagnation. Before anyone says we're stagnated because of the economy. Delta has posted record profits during this time and we bought 88 717s and 100 737s and it looks like we'll keep the 9 for another year. Why shouldn't that require more pilots. Anyway didn't realize I had the drama meter on high. Sorry! You should however keep one thing in mind. They are making record profits only because of severe capacity restraint on the part of marketing. If that breaks down the profits will evaporate. |
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 1272377)
I get it: the 2-yr FO that has nothing to show for 2 years but a commute to Reserve in NYC is a victim, but the 14-yr FO that can show a reasonable schedule on a NB and was able to bid to a better base after just a furlough or two is a winner.
Could you tell me where I fit in? 12 year 88 ATL B, still in the bottom 1/3 of the line-holders. This coveted position allows me to work most weekends and holidays. It's not that I posted this to complain, it's that you and other "senior" folks really shouldn't be so quick to judge what life at the bottom or close to it is like for a long period of time. |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1272397)
It does require more pilots. They will be coming. The contract was signed less then 100 days ago. The first aircraft that you site don't arrive until Aug of 2013. That schedule has not changed a day. They expect to add as many as 150 mil leave returnees to the list this winter. 15 are in class now. Probably does you little good since most were 2000-01 hires but its more bodies. They never planned on hiring more then a handful of pilots this year under any circumstances. Next year they will be hiring and it will continue for many years unless there is a world wide collapse.
You should however keep one thing in mind. They are making record profits only because of severe capacity restraint on the part of marketing. If that breaks down the profits will evaporate. The frustration other than being told we're fat is I keep getting calls for IA and out of base GS (Sat aka CFB morning) and so I'm not seeing it on my "beloved" fifi. The main frustration is not being able to bring my military friends on board. I can only tell them so many times, we're hiring soon. As Annie says tomorrow, tomorrow, it's only a day away. Guys, let's watch some cheerleaders, I mean College football enjoy the ones we're with and I'll try to remember this is a great company going places and I have a job which in this economy is a great thing! |
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 1272386)
We're OK. I've just found the stagnation tough to stomach lately, and I don't begrudge anyone else for being dissatisfied. I don't suggest to anyone they need to leave (to a certain extent) just because they're frustrated over the short or medium-term, so I understand and accept your frustration.
I just specifically object to people who are sure it's better elsewhere, the proof being that newhires are leaving, and are trying to cash that into sympathy. Newhires can, and should, move around when hiring is ongoing. I admire those who make calls, and don't want to be stuck with those that can't. I also think that if there ever is a point when I absolutely can't stand my career, and it's been going on for years, I should go. In the meantime, I would have tried to strike a balance between just enough complaining as to make conversation, not so much as to look over to find the other guy hanging from a hat hook with his tie around his neck... |
Originally Posted by capncrunch
(Post 1272392)
Yes he does and he'll let his condescending attitude let you know it.
47%?:p |
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 1272394)
Did you read his follow-up post?
It provided some clarification, but doesn't excuse the high drama shot. And his request for cheerleaders doesn't excuse that, in my view. |
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 1272407)
Yeah, after the fact. He put it up while I was typing.
It provided some clarification, but doesn't excuse the high drama shot. And his request for cheerleaders doesn't excuse that, in my view. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:17 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands