Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-12-2012 | 11:06 AM
  #117831  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,619
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
Both slow and alfa lost their positions... slow may be up for another position, though- we'll see.
Sometimes you are a small person. Both slow and alfa DECIDED not to stay around after being asked to stay. I hope you realize that neither of us is unhappy in any way we have been looking for the exit door for a long time, I now get to work less and get paid more. But if your life is so small that it makes you happy to believe that we are weeping in our beers then go for it. This is part of the sad, pathetic politics of personal destruction that leads to a dysfunctional union unable to protect their members interests. Let's wallow in the muck a little more and see how that works for us.
Old 12-12-2012 | 11:06 AM
  #117832  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,877
Likes: 193
Default

I have some feedback from the calls I made. The numbers posted by Bar are correct. The company is however still in compliance with the contract so there is no direct action that can be taken at the moment. The company could meet the required flying percentages however it would require both a increase on our end and a pulldown by AF. They are not expected by the union to do that and they are expected to be in non compliance. The union intends to aggressively pursue remedies to the situation however at the moment they can't do anything. It does however provide us leverage in future JV discussions and there will have to be a penalty to the company for non compliance. At a minimum I would expect a financial penalty equal to the flying that would be required to bring the percentages into contractual compliance.
Old 12-12-2012 | 11:07 AM
  #117833  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
I have some feedback from the calls I made. The numbers posted by Bar are correct. The company is however still in compliance with the contract so there is no direct action that can be taken at the moment. The company could meet the required flying percentages however it would require both a increase on our end and a pulldown by AF. They are not expected by the union to do that and they are expected to be in non compliance. The union intends to aggressively pursue remedies to the situation however at the moment they can't do anything. It does however provide us leverage in future JV discussions and there will have to be a penalty to the company for non compliance. At a minimum I would expect a financial penalty equal to the flying that would be required to bring the percentages into contractual compliance.
The only reason they are still in compliance is because of the relief given by the union on the window!
Old 12-12-2012 | 11:15 AM
  #117834  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
I have some feedback from the calls I made. The numbers posted by Bar are correct. The company is however still in compliance with the contract so there is no direct action that can be taken at the moment. The company could meet the required flying percentages however it would require both a increase on our end and a pulldown by AF. They are not expected by the union to do that and they are expected to be in non compliance. The union intends to aggressively pursue remedies to the situation however at the moment they can't do anything. It does however provide us leverage in future JV discussions and there will have to be a penalty to the company for non compliance. At a minimum I would expect a financial penalty equal to the flying that would be required to bring the percentages into contractual compliance.
Never mind ... was going to say "thanks" but he again suggests that I quit working here

Last edited by Bucking Bar; 12-12-2012 at 11:25 AM.
Old 12-12-2012 | 11:24 AM
  #117835  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Bar , if you believe even half the stuff you post why don't you vote with your feet, show some courage and get out!
You first. After a little calling around, you learned that in fact...
Originally Posted by sailingfun
The numbers posted by Bar are correct.
You now state that you share the goal of contract compliance and I am happy to welcome you on board. ... bygones

Last edited by Bucking Bar; 12-12-2012 at 12:09 PM.
Old 12-12-2012 | 11:29 AM
  #117836  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,583
Likes: 326
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo
The quickest way to find out exactly what's going on, and where the sims are, is to pick up the phone and call your Fleet Captain, that's what he's there for. Ask him all those questions, he will know the answers.

If you are ATL Based, until Jan. 1, you will have to pay for your own motel if you need one in ATL. I use the Motel 6 on Virginia Av. about $46 out the door.
I used that Motel 6 once. Never again. I'm a cheap ass, but I have some standards.
Old 12-12-2012 | 11:33 AM
  #117837  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,583
Likes: 326
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
I have some feedback from the calls I made. The numbers posted by Bar are correct. The company is however still in compliance with the contract so there is no direct action that can be taken at the moment. The company could meet the required flying percentages however it would require both a increase on our end and a pulldown by AF. They are not expected by the union to do that and they are expected to be in non compliance. The union intends to aggressively pursue remedies to the situation however at the moment they can't do anything. It does however provide us leverage in future JV discussions and there will have to be a penalty to the company for non compliance. At a minimum I would expect a financial penalty equal to the flying that would be required to bring the percentages into contractual compliance.
Section 1 is the most important part of our contract. If we can't enforce it, we are done.
Old 12-12-2012 | 11:36 AM
  #117838  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by alfaromeo
Both Slow and Alfa were asked to stay and took other opportunities. (slight edit)
Thank you for your service.

It was not an easy tenure with the issues we faced as a pilot group. The team leaves a strong legacy of tangible results, especially when measured by the datum of our peer group over the same period of time.

While we vigorously debate the issues and occasionally disagree, we always share a common goal of doing our best to improve the job protections, pay and working conditions of our pilots.

Among ALPA members, we are always among friends.

Last edited by Bucking Bar; 12-12-2012 at 11:46 AM.
Old 12-12-2012 | 11:46 AM
  #117839  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Being edited
Old 12-12-2012 | 12:03 PM
  #117840  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

(reply not aimed specifically at anyone, Sailingfun's post simply outlines the most likely result correctly and succinctly)
Originally Posted by sailingfun
... they are expected to be in non compliance. The union intends to aggressively pursue remedies to the situation .... It does however provide us leverage in future JV discussions and there will have to be a penalty to the company for non compliance. At a minimum I would expect a financial penalty equal to the flying that would be required to bring the percentages into contractual compliance.
AKA, Wide Body Scope Sale.

So, when we sit down to figure out the sales price of our job security, do we:
  • Calculate the widebody to narrow body Captain differential
  • Narrow Body Captain to Wide Body FO differential
  • Wide Body FO to narrow body FO differential
  • Quality of life differential in all categories
  • The value of lost longevity for the Delta pilots whos' career stagnated
No matter what we "sell" scope for, it is not worth it.

Our management is smart. ALPA is no dummy either. For some reason neither side wants to stop trading in ALPA members' jobs.

My hope is that Delta will eventually find some of that "We love to Fly and it shows" spirit.

Last edited by Bucking Bar; 12-12-2012 at 12:35 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices