Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?


Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Old 12-13-2012 | 07:25 AM
  #117921  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
First, I never stated that. Retread my post. The post was about the AF and other joint ventures and unrealistic expectations some have on how they should be structured. There are political realities involved. If Delta made a choice today to be a pure standalone airline today where do you see Delta in 5 years. Do you honestly believe as some seem to that we should do half the flying to and from France? Do you believe such an agreement which would relegate AF to a small percentage of that traffic compared to the combined presence of all US airlines could ever be negotiated? My post was in reference to that traffic. It was not in reference to section one which requires we fly 50 percent of all transatlantic traffic.
On that subject I have spoken with my reps on this issue and put in a call to one of the people who monitor the situation. The first point is the company is in compliance with the contract at this point in time. I have asked that we get the company plan to comply. I am waiting for a return call to verify the numbers. If they are as posted here then I will write a letter to management asking questions as I have done often in the past. The letter will be signed. Most forum cowboys tend to be cowards afraid to sign their names. I suspect I am one of the few posters here who have not once but several times received a summons from senior management to include the then CEO over letters I have written.
Answer to emboldened in red: Unequivocally, absolutely YES.... at a minimum. The USA is OUR homebase. France is theirs. They can fly from France to anywhere in the world they want to go as many times/day as they feel the need. Except here. Why do you feel they should get the lion's share of the departures between. That makes no sense. Delta Air Lines has an agreement with AF/KLM. UAL does not. that is UAL's problem... or at least it should be, not ours. No.. you are very logical on many issues here and I tend to agree with much that you say, but not on this.

The real problem here is that we have a federal government that doesn't give a rat's ass about our airline industry. WE have no national airline policy that will protect the American airline industry. Japan does. France does... Nigeria does. Everybody except the USA does.
Old 12-13-2012 | 07:28 AM
  #117922  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo
The quickest way to find out exactly what's going on, and where the sims are, is to pick up the phone and call your Fleet Captain, that's what he's there for. Ask him all those questions, he will know the answers.

If you are ATL Based, until Jan. 1, you will have to pay for your own motel if you need one in ATL. I use the Motel 6 on Virginia Av. about $46 out the door.
The Hooker House?
Old 12-13-2012 | 07:33 AM
  #117923  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
I have some feedback from the calls I made. The numbers posted by Bar are correct. The company is however still in compliance with the contract so there is no direct action that can be taken at the moment. The company could meet the required flying percentages however it would require both a increase on our end and a pulldown by AF. They are not expected by the union to do that and they are expected to be in non compliance. The union intends to aggressively pursue remedies to the situation however at the moment they can't do anything. It does however provide us leverage in future JV discussions and there will have to be a penalty to the company for non compliance. At a minimum I would expect a financial penalty equal to the flying that would be required to bring the percentages into contractual compliance.
Prepare grievance papers.

We need not wait for any "future" JV agreements. We have just been presented with one.

Money would be good, but not the preferential remedy IMHO.
Old 12-13-2012 | 07:36 AM
  #117924  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Your statement is not exactly true. It was a negotiation. In return for the company getting the 3 year window we got a higher percentage of the flying. 2.4 percent if I recall. I have since my last post been contacted again by people directly involved. There are some interesting numbers. The first thing that needs to be understood is with the Alitalia agreement the company had to grow our share of flying to be in compliance long term. That is part of the 2.4 percent mentioned above if a snapshot had been taken the day they joined the alliance. Had we kept the 1 year window and the metric when Alitalia was added they would be in compliance. That is why they got the 3 year window, allowing them time to add the additional required flying. That has not happened because of the economy in Europe. We have not lost flying percentage wise to AF/KLM. The pull down has been equal on both sides. We did not however gain the flying we were supposed to get with the 3 year window. I thought we had made a greater pull down but that is not the case. In fact in terms of block hours our percentage is up from around 53 percent of the transatlantic JV hours to 55 percent today. The agreement is based of course on a metric more complicated then straight block hours however block hours equates directly with jobs.
We have some really qualified people working on this and monitoring the situation. If pilots have concerns they are more then willing to talk with you and explain things in terms that the layman can understand. All it takes is a few phone calls. The union is well aware the company may fall out of compliance and has plans in place to work on equitable solutions. They can't however take any action until they are actually in violation of the agreement.
You've been called twice and I am still waiting for them to return my first call. I guess you KNOW somebody.
Old 12-13-2012 | 07:39 AM
  #117925  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
Prepare grievance papers.

We need not wait for any "future" JV agreements. We have just been presented with one.

Money would be good, but not the preferential remedy IMHO.
TSquare,

We can't grieve it until there is non compliance. I've been pushing for at least a letter from our MEC Chair (or MEC body), but have been told that everyone is aware of the issue. ALPA seems to have accepted management's explanation that Air France is not as "nimble" with capacity reductions as we are.

Whether or not 50% is "fair" does not much matter. 50% is what was agreed to. I do my best as an employee to perform every service I am contracted to do (and more). I would like the same measure of good faith reciprocated by Delta Air Lines (who pays for their share of the Air France operation).

I have asked my Reps to direct corrective action, to restore our flying, if renegotiation takes place prior to the cure period in the JV.
Old 12-13-2012 | 07:40 AM
  #117926  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
. It is an anonymous board, EOS.
For some of you it might be.
Old 12-13-2012 | 07:51 AM
  #117927  
hoserpilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,026
Likes: 0
From: maddoggy dog
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
For some of you it might be.
Don't worry T. Even though I saw you I still couldn't pick you out of a police line up. Unless you were wearing a short sleeve shirt with a tie.
Old 12-13-2012 | 07:54 AM
  #117928  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
TSquare,

We can't grieve it until there is non compliance. I've been pushing for at least a letter from our MEC Chair (or MEC body), but have been told that everyone is aware of the issue. ALPA seems to have accepted management's explanation that Air France is not as "nimble" with capacity reductions as we are.

Whether or not 50% is "fair" does not much matter. 50% is what was agreed to. I do my best as an employee to perform every service I am contracted to do (and more). I would like the same measure of good faith reciprocated by Delta Air Lines (who pays for their share of the Air France operation).

I have asked my Reps to direct corrective action, to restore our flying, if renegotiation takes place prior to the cure period in the JV.
I know that grievance cannot be filed until on is broached. that being said, Maybe ftb can put his research prowess to work and show us how many flights between countries we have vs what AF/KLM has. 50% is fine, but what sailing was saying.. I think.. is that AF can fly more because UAL and CAL and USA and AA all have flights between countries too. I don't care about any of them. Our agreement is that we have 50% of all that flying, then we should have 50% of all that flying. If AF adds something.. then we should too. Or grieve it.

Still waiting for my call back from DALPA.
Old 12-13-2012 | 08:10 AM
  #117929  
Free Bird's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 799
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
I have asked my Reps to direct corrective action, to restore our flying, if renegotiation takes place prior to the cure period in the JV.
Any future language should resemble: Non-compliance with JV's prohibits the company from entering into any other JV's until the corrections are made. Furthermore, all Delta pilots get immediate 10% pay raises until the balances are complied with. Under no circumstances will the corrections take more than 12 months.

If we can't get compliance with our written SCOPE then we are in big trouble.
Old 12-13-2012 | 08:17 AM
  #117930  
Superpilot92's Avatar
Underboob King
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 4,412
Likes: 0
From: Guppy Commander
Default

Originally Posted by Free Bird
Any future language should resemble: Non-compliance with JV's prohibits the company from entering into any other JV's until the corrections are made. Furthermore, all Delta pilots get immediate 10% pay raises until the balances are complied with. Under no circumstances will the corrections take more than 12 months.

If we can't get compliance with our written SCOPE then we are in big trouble.
This X 2!!!

Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices