Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-30-2012 | 09:10 PM
  #118861  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by Hawaii50
Who the he** writes on our airplanes anyway? I've always wondered, when I see that, who the idiots are. Ocassionally the moron thinks his crap is so interesting he should use a permanent marker. Can we just go back to hiding porn?

Most of it isn't that funny... but...

I did find a picture in a 757 that was a hand drawn cartoon of lee moak with his wife and a dog next to his house which was named bastian.

The caption read "Now Lee, the dog can lick his balls just fine himself."
Old 12-31-2012 | 01:57 AM
  #118862  
DAL73n's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
From: 737n/FO
Default ALPA/DALPA Call to Actions

Just thought I'd share that I received a personalized response from my Senator about a form letter e-mail I'd sent to him from one of the Calls to Action. While I assume he didn't actually write it (most likely a staffer) it was personalized enough to know that someone on his staff looked at it and took the time to write a coherent response. I was surprised to receive any response at all (it was the one about FFDO funding). I have used both e-mail, fax and snail mail in the past BUT this is the first time I have received a response and I was pleased to see it. Has anyone else had a response to any of the Calls to action?
Old 12-31-2012 | 01:59 AM
  #118863  
Jughead's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
From: ATL717A
Default

Originally Posted by Hawaii50
Who the he** writes on our airplanes anyway? I've always wondered,when I see that, who the idiots are. Occasionally the moron thinks his crap is so interesting he should use a permanent marker. Can we just go back to hiding porn?
I always enjoy reading some of the deep thoughts scrawled in fat sharpie inside the cargo compartment.
Old 12-31-2012 | 02:41 AM
  #118864  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,919
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
Most of it isn't that funny... but...

I did find a picture in a 757 that was a hand drawn cartoon of lee moak with his wife and a dog next to his house which was named bastian.

The caption read "Now Lee, the dog can lick his balls just fine himself."
That's a little more colorful than DogWhisperer's typical cartoons, but funny nonetheless.
Old 12-31-2012 | 03:34 AM
  #118865  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
From: 7ER Capt
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
Most of it isn't that funny... but...

I did find a picture in a 757 that was a hand drawn cartoon of lee moak with his wife and a dog next to his house which was named bastian.

The caption read "Now Lee, the dog can lick his balls just fine himself."
And yet, we want to be considered "professionals"... and paid/treated accordingly.
Old 12-31-2012 | 04:06 AM
  #118866  
RonRicco's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 833
Likes: 5
From: Captain
Default

Originally Posted by nerd2009
IMO, The a321's if they come will be grouped into the 320 pay rates. Just like the 737's, M88/90, 757/767.......more of the same to come.....
See this is the conundrum. Some pilots flying in common category loathe having separate pay on aircraft (M88-M90) so the lower paying equipment has been brought up to the higher paying rate. There is some downside though, as the higher paying equipment does somewhat subsidize the higher pay rate of the smaller equipment.

Now when you introduce a new piece of equipment that should generate more revenue and justify higher pay, we want it to pay more than the current category, but how long will it be before pilots start complaining that they aren't getting paid as much to fly the 320 as the 321?

This is one of the problems with pay banding.
Old 12-31-2012 | 05:35 AM
  #118867  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by Hawaii50
Who the he** writes on our airplanes anyway? I've always wondered,when I see that, who the idiots are. Occasionally the moron thinks his crap is so interesting he should use a permanent marker. Can we just go back to hiding porn?
New K is encouraged to sign things, isn't he? He's like Carroll Shelby is to Mustangs, right?
Old 12-31-2012 | 05:54 AM
  #118868  
NuGuy's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,105
Likes: 100
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
New K is encouraged to sign things, isn't he? He's like Carroll Shelby is to Mustangs, right?
Every time NewK's ride lifts off, it is as if he signs the very sky....


Nu
Old 12-31-2012 | 06:39 AM
  #118869  
flyallnite's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,898
Likes: 0
From: Stay THIRSTY, my friends!
Default

So, we're paying mechanics to go chase down graffiti? I guess those MCOs can wait...


,,,"-",,, Kilroy wuz here
Old 12-31-2012 | 06:45 AM
  #118870  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by RonRicco
See this is the conundrum. Some pilots flying in common category loathe having separate pay on aircraft (M88-M90) so the lower paying equipment has been brought up to the higher paying rate. There is some downside though, as the higher paying equipment does somewhat subsidize the higher pay rate of the smaller equipment.

Now when you introduce a new piece of equipment that should generate more revenue and justify higher pay, we want it to pay more than the current category, but how long will it be before pilots start complaining that they aren't getting paid as much to fly the 320 as the 321?

This is one of the problems with pay banding.
That's why we should hate pay banding, and why managements love it so: we don't capture our share of incremental revenue. Bigger planes are generally more efficient, so the company wants to naturally field the highest gauge consistent with sufficient frequencies. This reduces our numbers, so we need to re-capture the loss, in proportion to the number of seats.

Something that seats more ought to pay more. A formula to that effect (which can also factor speed) would have ensured that the company couldn't squeeze more from each 737 and 88, without paying those pilots more. More butts = more revenue for DAL = more pay for us. And yes, absolutely: the 747 should pay much more than the 777.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices