Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

Ferd149 03-25-2013 08:45 AM


Originally Posted by Denny Crane (Post 1379000)
80 and FTB,

Yeah, unfortunately I was....Such is life. Missed it by thaaaat much! I should know better by now than to bid so junior on equipment. Finished my TOE on the 19th and found out I was displaced on the 20th.....DOH! That's the bad news. The good news is I get to go back to the 767ER!! I do like the 757/767 plus the ER flying, it's very diverse.

Denny

Denny, saw that when the list came out:mad: What a waste. You'll be back, you know you will. Fifi is too quiet and too comfortable. Did you ever get to try the bunk? Wait, never mind.

Besides, we have to go back to Caveman (inside story boyz:D)

Had a great time!! See ya around campus

Ferd

gloopy 03-25-2013 08:45 AM


Originally Posted by newKnow (Post 1379005)
Anyone else think Southwest is trying to change their image? :D


Big time. The pilot putting his (optional AA style) hat on in the jetbridge was epic.

biigD 03-25-2013 08:49 AM


Originally Posted by gloopy (Post 1379198)
Big time. The pilot putting his (optional AA style) hat on in the jetbridge was epic.

Gotta love the basketball player rocking the burnt orange, however.

Hook'em! :)

SailorJerry 03-25-2013 09:30 AM


Originally Posted by forgot to bid (Post 1379057)

Whoa.

Yeah a little copycat except its in color and they had Fun! doing the music. Interesting, they are morphing. Don't know if that's a good thing for them or not but this time period will be a watershed time in their existence.

I was impressed. They used actual footage of an airplane climbing out of MDW, other than that CGI Delta jet defying the laws of physics entering the clouds.

Next up for SWA - Bags Fly...

TenYearsGone 03-25-2013 10:07 AM

March 2014 Forecast of Pilot Requirements=94XX

On Deltanet, check it out. I know this is just for requirements and not headcount but RA and team are truly getting closer to that 9000 number:)

TEN

johnso29 03-25-2013 10:12 AM


Originally Posted by Dirtdiver (Post 1379125)
That might have been the same MEC guy that came by my house last week. My daughter's cat had a litter of kittens, he took them out in my front yard, buried them up to their necks, and ran over them with my riding lawn mower.

I'm pretty sure he was on FPL at the time!

Good news is that when DPA takes over, they promised to sew the heads back on. And then get age 60 back.

Are you sure he wasn't a SWA pilot? :eek::D

tsquare 03-25-2013 10:15 AM

Originally Posted by qball http://www.airlinepilotforums.com/im...s/viewpost.gif

And you are basing that on what information pray tell?


ATL growing...MSP getting smaller?



ATL apparently has a very lucrative O&D numbers whereas (if you are talking about FLIGHTS and not based employees, I would wager) MSP does not. Believe it or not, it IS about making money, and the current group of execs are intent on doing that very thing, more so than any of the morons that have graced us with their presence in the time I have been here. And I for one do not want us to fly to places where we do not make money. They have been creative, and diligent in attaining their goals. Now, because MSP is apparently in YOUR paradigm of the top 1 places on the planet we should be flying, I am sure they are wrong in their analysis. I don't want MSP to go anywhere either though because all of those guys are senior, and that means more displacements downstream...



My paradigm is purely selfish...the only one leg commute there is for me. That said..my thoughts are not purely about MSP. I am wondering when ATL will reach critical mass if it has not already exceeded that. How much longer can they keep stuffing more stuff in there. I think a good deal of the cutbacks in MSP have as much to do having to deal with the state of Minnesota. The only reason MSP was the hub it was IMO was because NWA headquarters was there. After the merger, it is being relegated to the second tier hub it probably always would have/should have been. There was also a somewhat acrimonious relationship between NWA and the state and a fairly hostile media as well. I'm sure RA is long tired of dealing with that.



Oh, and FWIW, I have heard Mr Anderson say on more than one occasion that he likes DTW because of it's position on the great circle routes to both Asia and Europe.. so it is probably safe.



I would agree with that and DTW gates, etc are laid out better than MSP...but it's still...well... Detroit.



Now Timbo and I are still waiting for that E190 base in MCO... the number 1 tourist destination on planet earth... Of course Virgin insists on flying 2 to 4 747-400s there a few times each week.. and we all know how well they are doing financially, don't we?



Who gets to be the chief pilot?

/rant


Regarding "critical mass" at the ATL. I heard firsthand from an unimpeachable source that the land is available for a 6th strip of asphalt in ATL. (He didn't say whether it was or was not going to be built anytime soon however). So I don't think "critical mass" will hit that place for a long time. For the first 20 years of my career I avoided that place like a Lady Gaga concert. Now that I have been domesticated and every trip starts with a leg to the ATL, I have come to realize how really head and shoulders above everywhere else it really is. It moves both people and airplanes very well. ATC there is very good (unlike DFW or NY) My only problem with it is that the company revolves around hometown procedures there, and if you are not on top of that, you might find yourself a little frustrated. (For example: does anybody have any idea where the metering freq is published and how in the world I am supposed to know when it is in effect???) But other than those kind of nitnoid things, I think it is a pretty good master base.

Adolphus Coors 03-25-2013 10:21 AM


Originally Posted by TenYearsGone (Post 1379245)
March 2014 Forecast of Pilot Requirements=94XX

On Deltanet, check it out. I know this is just for requirements and not headcount but RA and team are truly getting closer to that 9000 number:)

TEN

The 22D2 is a worthless report; don't read anything into it.

tsquare 03-25-2013 10:28 AM


Originally Posted by Vikz09 (Post 1378089)
Tsquare, Almost sounded spiteful!

I can tell you that Delta is walking a fine line with the twin cities market. I have lived there my whole life and never seen so many people looking for new travel options. My buddy's company (one of the many fortune 500 companies in the twin cities) requires him to drive to a plant in Omaha, NE. Vs. flying. Also noticed that many of these flights are exclusively large RJ now. Perhaps Delta is placing those planes in the msp market because there is a lack of real competition, I don't have the answer but other airlines are taking notice and starting to poach the msp traveler.

Yeah when you bolded it it certainly did, and I did not intend that so I do apologize for it coming across that way.

My point was that DAL is going to put assets where they make money, and I applaud them for that. I have had to accept that fact while sitting on MadDog and baby bus jumpseats from MCO to work (and other non-rev destinations) when we used to have widebodies. People in MEM have been trashing NWA (and now DAL) for years because we supposedly gouge them. That is probably true to an extent, and it is the unfortunate other edge of the sword when it comes to having a network carrier located in your hometown. You pay more.. but have more options. The city elders have for years.. in MEM.. been courting SWA and other "low cost carriers" all the while spitting in the face of NWA/DAL at every opportunity. So when we threaten to leave, they wonder why, and only then do they go to ATL to ask what they can do to get us to stay. MSP is probably no different.

tsquare 03-25-2013 10:32 AM


Originally Posted by buzzpat (Post 1378151)
Hey guys

Didn't our vacation pay go up with the new contract? I have a week this month and its 21 hours on my time card. Or am I overly ambitious?

And as an aside, bidding reserve on vacation is definitely the way to go. I did a spreadsheet on it, and it is eye opening... just an example, but if you have 2 weeks, and an ALV of 75 hours, you will get paid 85.5 and still have 6 x days. So that means you will "work" only 10 days for 85.5 hours. Better check my math though... :cool:


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:09 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands