![]() |
|
Originally Posted by Timbo
(Post 1401384)
I want to know who loaded it and who checked the locks and tiedowns.
I imagine the loadmaster inspects the ground guys work after the cargo is loaded. |
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 1401386)
Me too. And also what is being done to prevent something like that in the future. There is zero excuse for something like this. If straps can break, mandate stronger/more straps and regardless we obviously need a better system of verifying it was done right.
|
Originally Posted by Check Essential
(Post 1400654)
Chilling is an understatement. Its almost impossible to contemplate.
Pilot had no chance. That thing came down like a brick. Just stopped flying. Had to be the cargo broke loose in the climb. The CG looks so far aft they wouldn't have got 10 feet off the ground if they had actually loaded up and rotated in that shape. Only other explanation could be some sort of catastrophic control failure I suppose. RIP to those poor souls. RIP brothers... |
Originally Posted by iceman49
(Post 1401479)
It use to be chains on the large equipment.
I also found this on the interwebz. MRAP on a C-17. http://www.af.mil/shared/media/photo...-3798Y-003.JPG Loadmasters Tech Sgt. Kenneth Bragg (left) and Staff Sgt. Lucas P. Crumpton assess the strength of the tie down chains that are keeping an Mine Resistant Ambush Protected vehicle aboard a C-17 Globemaster III while at Kadena Air Base, Japan, Dec. 29, 2008. Each chain is suppose to be able to support 25,000 pounds, but due to the configuration, the ratio is limited; therefore they must make sure actual ratio is the effective ratio required to support the vehicle. (U.S. Air Force photo/Tech Sgt. Cohen A. Young) |
Why would the Navy have MRAPs? Just curious.
|
Originally Posted by N9373M
(Post 1401540)
Why would the Navy have MRAPs? Just curious.
Just sayin' |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1401282)
Dublin donuts is closed in terminal A in ATL... no more Starbucks or Dunkin in A or B now.
Carry on. TEN |
Survey: Single women prefer Delta, United
Let’s say you’re a person who travels frequently and you’re looking for a connection – not a connecting flight but a love connection.
According to MissTravel.com, your best chances are on a Delta Air Lines flight if the object of your desire is a single woman. The “destination-dating” website surveyed 2,000 single female travelers to find out which airline they use most often and 28 percent said Atlanta-based Delta was their No. 1 choice. The airline was preferred by13 percent more women than those who chose No. 2 United Airlines. Delta and United are the No. 1 and No. 2 largest U.S. carriers, respectively. United was followed by US Airways, Southwest, Virgin, JetBlue and AirTran. Single women also appear to be more talkative while traveling, according to MissTravel.com. Sixty-four acknowledged they speak to strangers at airports or on flights than anywhere else; 39 percent said that they have or would consider dating someone they met during a flight. Brandon Ware, the website's founder, suggested airlines increase their appeal to women traveling for leisure and the woman “who may have her eyes open for a potential love interest.” |
Originally Posted by Timbo
(Post 1401384)
I want to know who loaded it and who checked the locks and tiedowns.
|
Originally Posted by dalad
(Post 1400695)
That's like the DC-8 crash in MIA a few years back when the load of denim shifted to the tail. Arrow Air I think? The crew had no chance then, either. There but by the grace of God go us.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:52 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands