Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

johnso29 07-06-2013 10:08 AM


Originally Posted by TOGA LK (Post 1440116)
In a company fully committed to capacity discipline while out competitors place record orders I often wonder how anyone thinks less total RJs but much larger ones benefits the profession in any way. I guess no one else sees 2x CRJ-900s with more range and frequency replacing some of our older narrow bodies.

Trends:
DCI gets bigger jets
Alaska codeshare
MX and S. America codeshares
Virginia Atlantic
KLM/Air France
....
And the -88s are conveniently last to get cockpit upgrades. Reality is once all these -900s are up and running I bet SLC and MSP follow the path of CVG, MEM and ANC. That's basically five bases in five years.
Now that we are all displaced at least one or two seats its time for another merger! I am sure this is coincidence...


If CRJ900s are replacing our older NB jets, then what's replacing the 400+ 50 seaters that are being parked? Also ANC & MEM were closed, but CVG was not. So which way will SLC & MSP go? Staying open like CVG, or closing like MEM & ANC?

Carl Spackler 07-06-2013 10:15 AM


Originally Posted by finis72 (Post 1440043)
My problem with the DPA has been they only attack DALPA and offer nothing new nothing original.

Then you've never read anything on the website. They attack ALPA for sure...and for very accurate reasons. But there are many new ways of doing business listed. What you've said is just not true.


Originally Posted by finis72 (Post 1440043)
Some of their blurbs are pure pandering, populist half truths that only a few pilots on the IQ level with Purple Dank would swallow whole.

This is the kind of stuff that makes me believe you never signed a card or ever went to the website. I don't recall anything from you other than 100% full throated ALPA support. That is of course your right, I just don't remember even the smallest thought of an independent union from you.


Originally Posted by finis72 (Post 1440043)
I agree we aren't yet paid what we are worth but I do believe we are near the top of US passenger airlines.

This is where you are so wrong finis and your position at the top of the heap is skewing your thinking. First, it's wrong to exclude UPS and FDX. Second, the fact that our pay for the 747 and 777 is approaching that of SWA crews is nothing to crow about. Every pilot makes that at SWA. Only a small percentage of Delta pilots make what you and I make. Further, a significant portion of our seniority list will NEVER make what we make because they'll never get there. You really need to rethink your statement above.


Originally Posted by finis72 (Post 1440043)
You accuse Alpha of conjecture then you turn around and say we left money on the table, that is pure made up horse manure unless you happen to be on RA's senior management team. We don't know.

We know with 100% certainty finis. There wasn't even a hint of buying the Virgin stake or the remnants of Pinnacle. Only the corporate goal of debt reduction. The only reason they were able to make these purchases was because of the money we left on the table. If we had taken that money, they wouldn't have been able to make these outsource facilitating purchases and still meet the debt reduction milestones they promised Wall Street.


Originally Posted by finis72 (Post 1440043)
I do agree with worrying about the purchase of Virgin and more outsourcing I just don't agree with how that was financed.

See above. By leaving extra money on the table, we allowed management to keep their debt reduction promises and make these new outsourcing purchases.

Again, we (DALPA) actually aided management in purchasing more opportunities for management to outsource our jobs. Why would we do that? Because ALPA's mandate is to gain members by spreading the wealth from the have's (Delta pilots) to the have not's (DCI & select JV partners). Welcome to ALPA's brave new world.

Carl

Carl Spackler 07-06-2013 10:20 AM


Originally Posted by johnso29 (Post 1440206)
The only reason those other airlines are hiring now, is because their Age 65 retirements have come earlier. I have several friends that fly for United. They tell me the operation is a trainwreck. A friend of mine on the B737 waited 3 hours in ORD for brakes to arrive. That's one of UALs biggest hubs! And they didn't have replacement parts?

We have the exact same issues with the exact same delays.


Originally Posted by johnso29 (Post 1440206)
And I don't think Emirates will EVER have a base anywhere but in the UAE. Those pesky unions would impose actual contractual obligations, thereby reducing their efficiencies and eating into their profits.

Nah. They'll get around that by having ALPA represent the pilots.

Carl

Carl Spackler 07-06-2013 10:29 AM


Originally Posted by DeadHead (Post 1440042)
Hey hypothetical question.

Is it possible to create a contract that ties in secondary raises to debt reduction thresholds?
(i.e. once company debt is reduced to $8 billion pilots get a 4% raise)

Unless I'm misunderstanding you, I think we'd want just the opposite. Raises that kick in if the company doesn't meet its promised debt reduction goals. That would make them think really hard about buying Virgin stakes and Pinnacle remnants.

Carl

Carl Spackler 07-06-2013 10:33 AM


Originally Posted by Purple Drank (Post 1440082)
DALPA's willingness to cede massive efficiencies outside of bankruptcy are completely self-induced, and compound the other difficulties you mentioned.

This is 100% spot on.

Carl

Carl Spackler 07-06-2013 10:38 AM


Originally Posted by Hawaii50 (Post 1440112)
I feel your pain. Life long FO here. It's hard to watch the company grow out west using RJs in our very limited gate space while there is almost never a seat available on anything I fly. We had a massive head start on the merger parade and much of the success was due to pilot cooperation. Seems like we would have been able to capitalize and capture some market share. Unfortunately our company is addicted to capacity restraint. Whine mode off.

Another spot on point and one that is not mentioned often enough.

Carl

Carl Spackler 07-06-2013 10:47 AM


Originally Posted by TOGA LK (Post 1440106)
Sadly I long for the day a company like Emirates can hire into some decent bases, I'd be long gone.


Originally Posted by tsquare (Post 1440202)
Don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.

YES! AWESOME!!

First johnso29 telling people to resign, now this.

The ghost of Dr. Janus is so proud right now.

Carl

CAAC ATP 07-06-2013 10:53 AM


Originally Posted by johnso29 (Post 1440209)
If CRJ900s are replacing our older NB jets, then what's replacing the 400+ 50 seaters that are being parked? Also ANC & MEM were closed, but CVG was not. So which way will SLC & MSP go? Staying open like CVG, or closing like MEM & ANC?

Nothing. Capacity reduction.

An article from the New York Times hit it square on the head back in 2012.

"..., the cramped 50-seat regional jets that were the backbone of service for midsize and smaller markets are disappearing. In some markets, that means service is being eliminated. In others, though, it means reduced schedules on fewer routes, served by slightly bigger planes like the Bombardier CRJ-700, which is a stretched version of the older 50-seat CRJ-200." -Joe Sharkey, New York Times

A few things happened to make this even more lucrative to Delta. We ratified the new contract. Comair and its senior employee group were eliminated. GoJet was signed on to fly those airplanes and Pinnacle was restructured.

This process is continuing at mainline as we have already cut capacity and now we are retiring and replacing larger higher paying aircraft with smaller lower paying aircraft.

The last few years have witnessed nothing short of a large restructuring of Delta. Everything has been driven by cost savings and debt reduction rather than growth or competition.

DeadHead 07-06-2013 11:09 AM


Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1440220)
Unless I'm misunderstanding you, I think we'd want just the opposite. Raises that kick in if the company doesn't meet its promised debt reduction goals. That would make them think really hard about buying Virgin stakes and Pinnacle remnants.

Carl

We've been told time and time again that the companys' goals and our goals are aligned. If the company does well, then we all do well.

While I agree with this logic to some extent, durning contract negotiations the exact opposite is true.

If our aligned interests are so apparent, then why not official connect them contractually to one another. I guess the downside to this is that if the company performs poorly, the we would receive a comeasurate pay cut. To that I would say, isn't that already the case?

Ed Harley 07-06-2013 11:20 AM

Asiana 777 accident
 
CNN reporting an Asiana 777 "crashed" in SFO on landing....


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:24 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands